Skip to main content
. 2005 May;49(5):1782–1786. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.5.1782-1786.2005

TABLE 2.

Antimicrobial susceptibility of nalD P. aeruginosa

Strain nalD statusa MIC (μg/ml)b
mexA expressionc
CAM NAL TET NOV CAR TIC ATM
K870 WT 16 64 8 512 128
K2346 Null 64 256 256 1,024 512
K2346(pDSK519)d Null 64 256 256 1,024 512
K2346(pMLS003)d WT 8 64 64 256 64
K2347 Null 64 256 256 1,024 512
PAO1 WT 32 64 32 16 8 1.00
1113(pDSK519)e ΔT410-G433 64 256 64 64 32 1.69
1113(pMLS003)e WT 32 32 16 8 2 0.34
WL24(pDSK519)e ? 128 >1,028 128 64 16 2.41
WL24(pMLS003)e WT 32 >1,028f 32 16 2 0.25
a

The indicated strains expressed wild type (WT), nalD::mini-Tn5-tet-disrupted (Null), or mutant nalD genes (specific mutations are highlighted as base changes in the gene itself). Mutations in nalD were verified following PCR amplification of the gene and nucleotide sequencing of the PCR product obtained. ?, the nalD gene could not be amplified by PCR, suggesting a possible deletion of the gene in this strain.

b

CAM, chloramphenicol; NAL, nalidixic acid; TET, tetracycline; NOV, novobiocin; CAR, carbenicillin; TIC, ticarcillin; ATM, aztreonam.

c

mexA expression (as a measure of mexAB-oprM expression) was quantitated using real-time RT- PCR and normalized to expression levels seen in wild-type strain PAO1.

d

pDSK519 is the vector without nalD; pMLS003 is pDSK519::nalD.

e

Clinical isolate.

f

The apparent lack of an impact of the cloned nalD gene on the nalidixic acid MIC likely reflects the presence of another determinant(s) of resistance to this agent in strain WL24, which may be masking any impact of mexAB-oprM expression on resistance.