Table 3.
Comparison of the Bioactivity of NiO and the Previously Reported Antiparasitic and Antimicrobial Nanoparticles
| Nanomaterial | Bioactivity | Effect | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NiO-NPs | Antiparasitic | Inhibited camel tick Hyalomma Dromedarii | [54] |
| Ag NPs | Antiparasitic | Inhibited larvae of malaria vector, Anopheles subpictus Grassi | [44] |
| Gold NPs | Antiparasitic | Inhibited Leishmania Major | [63] |
| CuO NPs | Antiparasitic | Inhibited E. histolytica | [64] |
| Curcuminoids-loaded lipid | Antiparasitic | Inhibited Plasmodium Berghei | [65] |
| NiO-NPs | Antiparasitic | Antiparasitic activity followed the order: NiO-olive > NiO-pure > olive leaf extract against adult H. dromedarii specimens | Current study |
| NiO-NPs | Antibacterial | NiO-NPs are more effective against Gram-negative bacteria than Gram-positive ones. | [66] |
| NiO-NPs | Antibacterial | Broad-spectrum antibiotic properties make synthetic NiO-NPs effective against Bacillus subtilis and E. coli. | [67] |
| NiO-NPs | Antifungal | A. alternata was found to be very sensitive with a percentage inhibition of 71.25%, followed by A. niger with a percentage inhibition of 39.51% at high concentrations (1000 g/mL), whilst F. oxysporum was found to be less vulnerable. | [68] |
| NiO-NPs | Antimicrobial | Gram-positive bacteria were targeted with higher activity than Gram-negative bacteria. The antibacterial activity of the NPs improved with an increase in NiO-NP concentration against all of the tested bacterial strains. | [69] |
| NiO-NPs | Antimicrobial | The greatest inhibition zone for Bacillus subtilis was 28.1±1.6 mm, whereas the minimum inhibition zone for Klebsiella pneumonia was 9.2± 0.5 mm. | [70] |
| NiO-NPs | Antimicrobial | The antimicrobial activity followed the order as-prepared (NiO-olive) > olive leaf extract > NiO-pure against, P. aeruginosa, B. cereus, A. niger, and C. albicans. | Current study |