Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 20;24:234. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11985-5

Table 2.

Clinicopathological variables and correlation with PPARG expression in the matched case control study population of 246 CRC patients. The percentages are shown in parentheses

Characteristics Total PPARG P-Value
low high
All patients 246 (100) 122 (49.6) 124 (50.4)
Age
    ≤ 66 122 (49.6) 60 (49.2) 62 (50.0) 0.898
    >  66 124 (50.4) 62 (50.8) 62 (50.0)
Sex
    male 145 (58.9) 61 (50) 84 (67.7) 0.005
    female 101 (41.1) 61 (50) 40 (32.3)
Tumour location
    Colon 108 (43.9) 49 (40.2) 59 (47.6) 0.275
    Rectosigmoid 22 (8.9) 14 (11.5) 8 (6.5)
    Rectum 116 (47.2) 59 (48.4) 57 (46.0)
pT-Stage
    T0 2 (0.8) 0 (0) 2 (1.6)
    T1 11 (4.5) 6 (4.9) 5 (4.1)
    T2 30 (12.2) 11 (9.0) 19 (15.3) 0.343
    T3 175 (71.1) 91 (74.6) 84 (67.7)
    T4 28 (11.4) 14 (11.5) 14 (11.3)
Tumour grade
    Low grade 166 (67.8) 83 (68.0) 83 (67.5) 0.926
    High grade 79 (32.2) 39 (32.0) 40 (32.5)
N-Stage
    N negative 115 (46.7) 60 (49.2) 55 (44.4) 0.441
    N positive 125 (50.8) 59 (48.4) 66 (53.2)
    Unknown 6 (2.4) 3 (2.5) 3 (2.4)
M-status
    M0 82 (33.3) 47 (38.5) 35 (28.2) Global: 0.053
    HEP 82 (33.3) 43 (35.2) 39 (31.5) M0 vs. HEP: 0.53
    PUL 82 (33.3) 32 (26.2) 50 (40.3) M0 vs. PUL: 0.019
Diabetes Mellitus II
    No 191 (77.6) 96 (78.7) 95 (76.6) 0.249
    Yes 33 (13.4) 13 (10,7) 20 (16.1)
    Unknown 22 (8.9) 13 (10.7) 9 (7.3)