Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Affect Disord. 2021 Nov 17;298(Pt B):57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.104

Table 3. Neurocognitive performance and peritraumatic symptoms.

Bivariate models predicting distress/dissociation from neurocognitive performance, controlling for significant demographic and motor vehicle injury variables.

Test Peritraumatic Distress Peritraumatic Dissociation
Estimate 95% CI F statistic (DF) Estimate 95% CI F statistic (DF)
Choice RT −0.09** (−0.16,−0.03) 7.5 (1644) −0.07 (−0.14,0.0) 3.7 (1648)
Simple RT −0.05 (−0.12,0.02) 1.8 (1644) −0.01 (−0.08,0.06) 0.1 (1648)
Emotion ID 0.06 (−0.01,0.12) 2.5 (1642) 0.03 (−0.04,0.1) 0.9 (1646)
Delay Discounting −0.02 (−0.09,0.05) 0.3 (1642) −0.04 (−0.11,0.03) 1.2 (1646)
PRT 0.01 (−0.06,0.08) 0.1 (1642) −0.02 (−0.09,0.05) 0.3 (1646)
Grad CPT 0.02 (−0.05,0.09) 0.3 (1641) −0.02 (−0.09,0.05) 0.5 (1645)
Vocab −0.04 (−0.12,0.03) 1.3 (1642) 0.03 (−0.04,0.11) 0.9 (1646)
Verbal Pairs −0.02 (−0.09,0.05) 0.2 (1642) −0.02 (−0.09,0.05) 0.3 (1646)
Digit Symbol −0.06 (−0.12,0.02) 2.4 (1642) −0.03 (−0.1,0.04) 0.7 (1646)
Forward Digits −0.09** (−0.16,−0.02) 7.1 (1642) −0.02 (−0.09,0.05) 0.3 (1646)
*

Significant at the 0.05 level, two-sided test.

**

Significant at the 0.05 level, two-sided test, corrected for false discovery rate.