Table 1.
Summary of all included studies.
| Reference | Country | Study design | Study population (No.) | Age, years (range) | Follow-up time, months (range) | Event year(s) | Injected amount of filler in each breast, ml | Method of injection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arslan,13 | Turkey | Case report | 1 | 35 | — | – | — | US* not used |
| Basara Akin,17 | Turkey | Case report | 1 | 37 | — | – | — | US not used |
| Chalcarz,16 | Poland | Case report | 4 | — | — | – | 100–260 | — |
| Elibol,18 | Turkey | Case report | 1 | 40 | — | – | — | — |
| Gierej,12 | Poland | Case report | 1 | 35 | 1, 6, 10 | 2020 | 150 | — |
| Hee Ko,11 | South Korea | Case report | 1 | 32 | — | — | — | — |
| Huβ,19 | Germany | Case report | 1 | 39 | 0.75 | — | — | — |
| Ikizceli,6 | Turkey | Case report | 1 | 24 | — | — | — | — |
| Jung,10 | South Korea | Case report + literature review | 1 | 32 | 24 | — | 200–250 | — |
| Kim,20 | South Korea | Case report + literature review | 1 | 49 | 6 | — | — | — |
| Loesch,21 | Switzerland | Case report- literature review | 1 | 33 | 1, 1.5, 12 | 2020 | — | — |
| Namgoong,22⁎⁎ | South Korea | Retrospective cohort | 146 | Mean 34 (26–50) | Mean 10.5 (6–18) | 2015–2019 | 50–300 | — |
| Nomoto,9 | Japan | Retrospective cohort | 29 | Mean 42 (26–61) | — | 2018–2020 | 20–250 | — |
| Ozcan,23 | Turkey | Case report | 2 | 28 and 32 | — | — | — | — |
| Shin,8 | South Korea | Case report | 2 | — | 6 | — | 65–95 | US not used |
| Son,7 | South Korea | Case report | 3 | 32, 42, and 44 | 15 (only reported for one patient) | — | — | — |
If an article neither commented nor negated a specific finding, it was reported as “—.”.
⁎
US=ultrasound.
⁎⁎
In one of the retrospective cohort studies (Namgoong et al.), six patients had buttock augmentation with Aquafilling, and these cases were included in the mean values for age and follow-up.