Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 16;101:105009. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105009

Table 3.

Adjusted comparison of clinically significant ADRs across treatment arms.

Entire study
Actionable patients
Control N = 529a PGx-guided N = 547a OR (96% CI)b p-valueb Control N = 126a PGx-guided N = 136a OR (96% CI)b p-valueb
Clinically relevant ADRs 81 (15%) 68 (12%) 0.79 (0.59, 1.13) 0.2 24 (19.05%) 14 (10.37%) 0.48 (0.23, 0.98) 0.049
Age 49 (40.58) 49 (39.58) 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) 0.002 51 (44.58) 50 (39.58) 0.98 (0.95, 1.01) 0.2
Co-medications 3.00 (2.00, 6.00) 3.00 (2.00, 5.00) 1.08 (1.02, 1.15) 0.013 3.00 (1.00, 5.00) 3.00 (2.00, 5.00) 1.18 (1.05, 1.33) 0.006
Baseline QoL 0.60 (0.40, 0.70) 0.59 (0.40, 0.70) 0.23 (0.10, 0.55) 0.001 0.50 (0.40, 0.70) 0.52 (0.40, 0.70)
a

Median (IQR); n (%).

b

Logistic regression of any clinically relevant ADRs on treatment arm, age, concomitant medications, diagnosis and baseline QoL (entire study) or treatment arm, age and concomitant medications (actionable patients).