TABLE 8.

Eccentricity influence on category selectivity.

fMRI experiment and ROI		Factor	Main effect	Post‐hoc Bonferroni/Dunn
Upright “Count20” Exp.	FFA – L (n = 12)	Eccentricity	F (2,22) = 7.8, p = .003
		0°, 4°		p = .02
		4°, 8°		p = 1
		0°,8°		p = .01
	FFA – R (n = 13)	Eccentricity	F (2,24) = 15.14, p = 5 × 10 −5
		0°, 4°		p = 1 × 10 −4
		4°, 8°		p = 1
		0°,8°		p = .001
	PPA – L (n = 13)	Eccentricity	F (2,24) = 18.8, p = 1 × 10 −5
		0°, 4°		p = .003
		4°, 8°		p = .29
		0°, 8°		p = 5 × 10 −5
	PPA – R (n = 14)	Eccentricity	F (2,26) = 31.12, p = 1 × 10 −7
		0°, 4°		p = 7 × 10 −5
		4°, 8°		p = .03
		0°, 8°		p = 9 × 10 −6
“DBLstml” exp.	FFA – L (n = 12)	Eccentricity	F (2,22) = 10.91, p = 5 × 10 −4
		0°, 4°		p = .003
		4°, 8°		p = 1
		0°, 8°		p = .008
	FFA – R (n = 14)	Eccentricity	F (2,26) = 9.33, p = 8 × 10 −4
		0°, 4°		p = .01
		4°, 8°		p = 1
		0°, 8°		p = .003
	PPA – L (n = 14)	Eccentricity	F (2,26) = 2.74, p = .1
		0°, 4°
		4°, 8°
		0°, 8°
	PPA – R (n = 14)	Eccentricity	F (2,26) = 8.6, p = .001
		0°, 4°		p = .14
		4°, 8°		p = .5
		0°, 8°		p = 6 × 10 −5

Note: For each region, results of one‐way repeated‐measures ANOVA (with Eccentricity as factor) on category selectivity are presented (see Results). Significant effects in bold. Note that overall there were significant influences of eccentricity on category selectivity (highest at the center, see Figure 7).