Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 26;2014(3):CD010844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010844.pub2

3. FEV1 network composition and transitivity assessmenta.

Comparison Comparisons N Ageb % male %FEV1c Packsd
LABA vs Placebo 13 8680 63.3 73.2 47.7 43.9
LAMA vs Placebo 16 23,111 64.3 72.2 47.6 48.9
ICS vs Placebo 12 4574 63.6 71.9 46.2 45.2
LABA/ICS vs Placebo 9 4978 63.9 73.5 41.6 44.4
LABA vs LAMA 2 2680 63.7 69.5 55.2 49.7
LABA vs ICS 5 2506 63.6 67.1 40.6 46.7
LABA vs LABA/ICS 12 8005 63.7 68.8 39.9 45.8
LAMA vs ICS 0
LAMA vs LABA/ICS 0
ICS vs LABA/ICS 8 4560 63.6 71.7 39.0 45.5

aSummary population data are for all study comparisons excluding those made in the 23 studies that could not be included in either the six‐month or the 12‐month FEV1 network; all doses are given in micrograms.

bAge = mean years.

c% FEV1 = mean percentage predicted FEV1.

dPacks = mean pack‐years.

FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in one second.

ICS = inhaled corticosteroid.

LABA = long‐acting beta2‐agonist.

LABA/ICS = long‐acting beta2‐agonist/inhaled corticosteroid combination therapy.

LAMA = long‐acting muscarinic antagonist.