Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 26;2014(3):CD010844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010844.pub2

To 2011.

Methods Design: randomised, parallel‐group, open‐label study
 Duration: 12 months
 Location: Japan
Participants Population: 186 participants were randomised to salmeterol (61) and indacaterol (125)
Baseline characteristics ‐ for whole population only
 Age (mean years): 69.1
 % Male: not reported
 % FEV1 predicted: 53
Pack‐years (mean): not reported
 Inclusion criteria: patients with moderate‐to‐severe COPD (post‐bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <70% and FEV1 >30% to <80% predicted) and smoking history of at least 20 pack‐years
 Exclusion criteria: not reported, abstract only
Interventions 1. Salmeterol 50 bid (LABA)
2. Indacaterol 300 qd (LABA)
Inhaler device: unclear
Allowed co‐medications: not described
Outcomes trough FEV1, TDI and safety assessments
Notes Funding: Novartis
 Identifier(s): unknown
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Patients meeting inclusion criteria were randomised in the ratio 2:1 to indacaterol and salmeterol (methods not described)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk no details
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Both treatments were administered open‐label
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Both treatments were administered open‐label
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear, abstract only
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Data could not be included in meta‐analysis, only abstract available