Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 12;8(1):e22. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.6

Table 2.

Knowledge and perceptions of current diversity, equity and inclusion, pre vs. post for each session, department of epidemiology and biostatistics diversity, equity and inclusion workshops, 2019-2020

Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4
Pre Post p-value Pre Post p-value Pre Post p-value Pre Post p-value
N = 67 N = 60 N = 54 N = 73 N = 45 N = 46 N = 82 N = 80
Current level of knowledge about DEI, median (IRQ)* 3.0
(2.0–3.0)
3.0
(3.0–3.0)
0.007 3.0
(2.0–3.0)
3.0
(3.0–3.0)
0.002 3.0
(3.0–3.0)
3.0
(3.0–4.0)
0.039 3.0
(2.0–3.0)
3.0
(3.0–3.0)
0.003
Yes to? or Perceived disparities in the workplace, Yes?, n (%)
Recruitment, admissions and hiring practices 18 (27%) 24 (40%) 0.13 24 (44%) 25 (46%) 1.00 16 (36%) 20 (43%) 0.52 41 (50%) 40 (50%) 1.00
Mentoring to support mentees from diverse backgrounds 16 (24%) 20 (33%) 0.32 21 (39%) 32 (59%) 0.054 18 (40%) 18 (39%) 1.00 33 (40%) 36 (45%) 0.63
Progression and promotion; salary 16 (24%) 13 (22%) 0.83 26 (48%) 27 (50%) 1.00 17 (38%) 17 (37%) 1.00 33 (40%) 34 (43%) 0.87
Resource/support allocation 6 (9%) 11 (18%) 0.19 14 (26%) 21 (39%) 0.22 13 (29%) 13 (28%) 1.00 24 (29%) 25 (31%) 0.86
Opportunities for leadership positions 15 (22%) 18 (30%) 0.42 23 (43%) 23 (43%) 1.00 24 (53%) 19 (41%) 0.30 42 (51%) 40 (50%) 1.00
Opportunities to give scientific lectures, workshops 5 (7%) 5 (8%) 1.00 4 (7%) 12 (22%) 0.055 9 (20%) 6 (13%) 0.41 12 (15%) 13 (16%) 0.83
Opportunities to teach courses for our trainees 6 (9%) 2 (3%) 0.28 3 (6%) 8 (15%) 0.20 9 (20%) 7 (15%) 0.59 14 (17%) 11 (14%) 0.66
Opportunities to participate on committees/work groups 3 (4%) 5 (8%) 0.47 7 (13%) 9 (17%) 0.79 7 (16%) 6 (13%) 0.77 10 (12%) 15 (19%) 0.28
Opportunities to participate in lectures, workshops 6 (9%) 5 (8%) 1.00 2 (4%) 8 (15%) 0.093 8 (18%) 5 (11%) 0.38 11 (13%) 10 (13%) 1.00
Degree of agreement with DEI Statements**
Lack of DEI is a problem within my workplace at University of California, San Francisco, mean (SD) 2.6 (0.6) 2.8 (0.5) 0.091 2.6 (0.7) 2.7 (0.8) 0.51 2.7 (0.8) 2.7 (0.7) 0.94 2.8 (0.8) 2.9 (0.9) 0.81
I am comfortable addressing DEI in my workplace, median (IQR) 3.0
(3.0–3.0)
3.0 (3.0–3.0) 0.75 3.0 (3.0–3.5) 3.0 (3.0–4.0) 0.62 3.0 (3.0–3.0) 3.0
(3.0–3.0)
0.58 3.0 (3.0–3.0) 3.0
(3.0–3.0)
0.34
I have the skills to improve DEI in my workplace, mean (SD) 2.8 (0.6) 2.9 (0.6) 0.19 2.7 (0.6) 3.0 (0.5) 0.011 2.8 (0.6) 3.1 (0.5) 0.023 2.8 (0.5) 3.0 (0.5) 0.004
Degree of agreement with DEI Statements**
I am responsible for improving DEI within my workplace, median (IQR) 3.0
(3.0–4.0)
3.5
(3.0–4.0)
0.10 3.0
(3.0–4.0)
4.0
(3.0–4.0)
0.27 3.0 (3.0–4.0) 4.0
(3.0–4.0)
0.78 4.0
(3.0–4.0)
3.0
(3.0–4.0)
0.50
I plan to work to improve DEI in my workplace, median, IQR 3.0
(3.0–4.0)
4.0
(3.0–4.0)
0.16 4.0
(3.0–4.0)
4.0
(3.0–4.0)
0.78 3.0 (3.0–4.0) 4.0
(3.0–4.0)
0.25 3.0
(3.0–4.0)
3.0
(3.0–4.0)
0.76

p-values for comparisons of binary variables (i.e. perceived disparities in the workplace) between pre and post based on Fisher’s exact test; p-values for comparisons of continuous variables (i.e. Likert scales) between pre and post based on two sample t-tests if normally distributed responses and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests if non-normally distributed; (paired tests not used because individual-level identifiers were not collected).

IQR = interquartile range; SD = standard deviation; DEI = diversity, equity, and inclusion.

*

4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 “Not knowledgeable at all” to 4 “Very knowledgeable.”

**

4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 “Strongly disagree” to 4 “Strongly agree.”