Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 5;8(1):e21. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.712

Table 2.

The logic model of clinical research professional workforce development

Inputs Activities Outputs Short-term outcomes
(Training changes)
Intermediate-term outcomes
(Practice changes)
Long-term
outcomes
(Impact)
Financial inputs: Institutional investments; PIs funding for CRPs to engage in training.
Human resources: new CRPs, experienced CRPs, institutional champions to promote CRP development and training content providers.
Didactic coursework focused on professional skills, recognized competencies, and certification preparation.
In-person and virtual guided discussions
Co-mentoring and network events that promote community and professional identity development
Well-trained and well-mentored CRPs who are effectively onboarded to their job responsibilities
CRP national certification
CRPs who become mentors to new CRPs
New and experienced CRP satisfaction
Increased professional skills
Effective initiation of studies
Successful career development measured by increased rate of CRP retention, engagement in professional societies, and organizational leadership
Effective conduct of clinical and translational studies without deviations or violations
Increased national capacity for translational research and increased rate of research translation

CRPs: Clinical Research Professionals; PIs: Principal Investigators.