Table 2.
The logic model of clinical research professional workforce development
| Inputs | Activities | Outputs | Short-term outcomes (Training changes) |
Intermediate-term outcomes (Practice changes) |
Long-term outcomes (Impact) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Financial inputs: Institutional investments; PIs funding for CRPs to engage in training. Human resources: new CRPs, experienced CRPs, institutional champions to promote CRP development and training content providers. |
Didactic coursework focused on professional skills, recognized competencies, and certification preparation. In-person and virtual guided discussions Co-mentoring and network events that promote community and professional identity development |
Well-trained and well-mentored CRPs who are effectively onboarded to their job responsibilities CRP national certification CRPs who become mentors to new CRPs |
New and experienced CRP satisfaction Increased professional skills Effective initiation of studies |
Successful career development measured by increased rate of CRP retention, engagement in professional societies, and organizational leadership Effective conduct of clinical and translational studies without deviations or violations |
Increased national capacity for translational research and increased rate of research translation |
CRPs: Clinical Research Professionals; PIs: Principal Investigators.