Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 2;63(7):3586–3598. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c04506

Table 2. Comparisons of Key Energies and Geometric Parameters in the HNO to NO Conversion Pathways.

system ΔG (kcal/mol) ΔG° (kcal/mol) ΔRM···Na (Å) refsb
[Cu(14-N4)] 26.86 –0.22 1.037 t.w.
[Cu(14-N2S2)] 21.10 –18.53 1.078 t.w.
[Cu(14-N2Se2)] 19.14 –21.62 1.201 t.w.
[Cu(14-N2S2-Ts)] 20.92 –26.14 0.995 t.w.
[Cu(14-N2S2-Bn)] 16.57 –25.20 1.102 t.w.
CuDHX1 20.59 –17.22 1.025 (59)
Cu-Fl 18.84 –11.21 1.050 (59)
Cu-Ts 23.53 –11.76 0.932 (59)
Cu-Me4 19.02 –14.29 0.971 (59)
CuZnSOD 10.98 –42.66 0.374 (61)
CuZnSOD model 12.12 –12.80 1.076 (69)
myoglobin –1.92 –10.07c N.A. (60)
catalase –1.18 –11.13c N.A. (60)
a

N.A. means not applicable.

b

Reference number. t.w. means this work.

c

The reaction energy is up to the NO-bound reduced metal, not the NO-released system.