Table 2.
Summary table of anomaly detection techniques with the traditional approach
| Techniques | Advantages | Limitations | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rule-based |
Application simplicity High inference speed Low computational cost Transparent and explainable process |
Expert knowledge required Difficulty in capturing complex relationships Limited to a low number of postures and differentiated from each other |
[49, 63, 65, 74] |
| Statistical |
Interpretability of results They provide probability estimations for each class Reasonable training time |
Assumption that the data follow a probability distribution Expert knowledge required Sensitive to irrelevant features Limited performance with complex data |
[13–23, 28] |
| Intelligent |
Ability to capture complex relationships Greater accuracy Adaptable to input changes Ability to ignore redundant features |
Need for large data sets Increased training time and computational resources Difficulty in selecting hyperparameters Lack of interpretability of the decision making process |
[5, 15, 17, 19, 24–32, 66, 68, 72, 75–85] |