Table 3.
Summary table of techniques with the new approach
| Techniques | Advantages | Limitations | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supervised |
High success rates Interpretation of results |
Limited number of anomalous samples: Unbalanced data base Health specialist presence required for data labeling Inability to characterize all anomalies |
[34, 93–102] |
|
Semi- Supervised |
Normal samples available Ability to detect unknown anomalies |
Since the postural pattern may be composed of different normal states, the normal boundary is wide Expert knowledge required in case of wanting to label different normal states |
[19, 67, 103–114] |
| Unsupervised |
No data labeling required Detection of unknown anomalies Applicable to large data sets |
Increased tendency to false positives Lack of interpretation Normal data are grouped in clusters assumption |
[92, 117–119, 122, 123, 125–127, 129–137] |
| Unsupervised |
No data labeling required Detection of unknown anomalies Applicable to large data sets |
Increased tendency to false positives Lack of interpretation Normal data are grouped in clusters assumption |
[92, 117–120, 122–127, 129–138] |