Table 1.
Summary profile of respondents’ agencies (n=57)
| n | (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Agency type | ||
| Academic institution | 34 | 60% |
| Government | 11 | 19% |
| Non-governmental organization | 4 | 7% |
| Inter-governmental organization | 3 | 5% |
| Private sector | 1 | 2% |
| Others | 4 | 7% |
| Agency level (multiple responses allowed) | ||
| International | 40 | 70% |
| National | 38 | 67% |
| Provincial/ state | 21 | 37% |
| Local/ municipal | 28 | 49% |
| Community | 25 | 44% |
| Work performed by organization (multiple responses allowed) | ||
| Research | 54 | 95% |
| Program development | 35 | 61% |
| Program implementation | 35 | 61% |
| Monitoring and evaluation | 31 | 54% |
| Risk assessment | 30 | 53% |
| Policy development | 28 | 49% |
| Others | 11 | 19% |
| Agency serving which disaster phase (multiple responses allowed) | ||
| Prevention | 47 | 82% |
| Preparedness | 54 | 95% |
| Readiness | 45 | 79% |
| Response | 45 | 79% |
| Recovery | 39 | 68% |
| Location where respondent based | ||
| Japan | 5 | |
| UK | 4 | |
| US | 3 | |
| Australia, Philippines | 2 | |
| China, Bahamas, Denmark, France, Ghana, Italy, Malaysia, Nepal, Netherlands, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand | 1 | |