Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 21.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Dec 22;11(2):197–212. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00483-0

Table 2:

PALICC recommendations for the management of PARDS

Summary of evidence from paediatric studies PALICC recommendations

Lung-protective ventilation • Threshold for injurious tidal volume not established (systematic review11)
• Higher mortality with lower PEEP relative to FiO2 than that recommended by the ARDS Network12 (observational study13)
• Improved oxygenation but no improvement in clinical outcomes with HFOV (small RCTs,1417 systematic review,18 observational study19); PROSpect 2 × 2 factorial, response-adaptive RCT (prone positioning and HFOV; NCT03896763) ongoing
• Use tidal volume of 5–8 mL/kg predicted bodyweight if respiratory system compliance preserved (3–6 mL/kg predicted bodyweight if respiratory system compliance reduced)20
• Maintain plateau pressure of ≤28 cm H2O (29–32 cm H2O if chest wall elastance increased)20
• Consider HFOV as an alternative approach if lung-protective ventilation targets cannot be maintained20
• Maintain SpO2 at 92–97% (88–92% for severe PARDS and PEEP ≥10 cm H2O)20
• Allow permissive hypercapnia: target pH 7–15-7–3020
Recruitment manoeuvres No paediatric studies Use incremental and decremental PEEP titration, with monitoring of markers of oxygen delivery, respiratory system compliance, and haemodynamics20
Fluid management Fluid overload associated with worse outcomes (oxygenation and fewer ventilator-free days; systematic review21) Use a goal-directed fluid-management protocol to maintain intravascular volume while minimising fluid overload22
Prone positioning No reduction in ventilator-free days (RCT23); PROSpect RCT ongoing Not recommended for routine use; consider in patients with severe PARDS24
Nitric oxide Improved oxygenation but no improvement in survival (RCTs, observational studies, literature review24) Not recommended for routine use; consider in patients with documented pulmonary hypertension or severe right ventricular failure, or as rescue from or bridge to ECMO24
Surfactant Improved oxygenation but no improvement in survival (RCTs, observational studies, literature review24) Not recommended for routine use24
Steroids No effect on survival or duration of ventilation (RCT25); longer duration of mechanical ventilation with prolonged steroid administration (observational study26) Not recommended for routine use24
Neuromuscular blockade Improved oxygenation27 but longer duration of mechanical ventilation and paediatric ICU stay28 (observational studies) Consider if sedation alone is deemed to be inadequate to achieve effective mechanical ventilation22
Sedation No effect on duration of mechanical ventilation with reduced sedation exposure (RCT29) • Use minimal yet effective targeted sedation to facilitate tolerance to mechanical ventilation and to optimise oxygen delivery, oxygen consumption, and work of breathing22
• Use validated pain and sedation scales22
ECMO No paediatric RCTs Consider in patients with severe PARDS when lung-protective ventilation strategies result in inadequate gas exchange; disease process must be deemed reversible30

PALICC recommendations from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference Group.10 ARDS=acute respiratory distress syndrome. ECMO=extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. FiO2=fraction of inspired oxygen. HFOV=high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. PALICC=Paediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. PARDS=paediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. PEEP=positive end-expiratory pressure. PROSpect=Prone and Oscillation Pediatric Clinical Trial. RCT=randomised controlled trial. SpO2=pulse-oximetric oxygen saturation.