Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 14;5(7):e2221699. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.21699

Table 2. Efficacy Assessments by Therapeutic Response of Patients.

Population Patients, No. (%)
CIPRO+FLUO CIPRO FLUO
Microbiological intent-to-treat population
Total No. 103 91 45
Visit 3 (primary end point)
Therapeutic cure 63 (61.2) 49 (53.8) 20 (44.4)
Therapeutic failure 40 (38.8) 42 (46.2) 25 (55.6)
Difference in response rate (95% CI)a NA 7.3 (–6.6 to 21.2) 16.7 (–0.6 to 34.0)
P valueb NA .30 .06
Visit 4
Therapeutic cure 90 (87.4) 69 (75.8) 36 (80.0)
Therapeutic failure 13 (12.6) 22 (24.2) 9 (20.0)
Difference in response rate (95% CI)a NA 11.6 (0.7 to 22.4) 7.4 (–6.0 to 20.7)
P valueb NA .04 .25
Clinical intent-to-treat population
Total No. 196 196 100
Visit 3
Therapeutic cure 107 (54.3) 94 (48.0) 45 (45.0)
Therapeutic failure 90 (45.7) 102 (52.0) 55 (55.0)
Difference in response rate (95% CI)a NA 6.4 (–3.5 to 16.2) 9.3 (–2.7 to 21.3)
P valueb NA .21 .13
Visit 4
Therapeutic cure 175 (88.8) 152 (77.6) 82 (82.0)
Therapeutic failure 22 (11.2) 44 (22.4) 18 (18.0)
Difference in response rate (95% CI)a NA 11.3 (4.0 to 18.6) 6.8 (–1.9 to 16.6)
P valueb NA .003 .10
Sustained microbiological outcome in microbiological intent-to-treat populationc
Total No. 103 91 45
Therapeutic cure 94 (91.3) 74 (81.3) 34 (75.6)
Therapeutic failure 9 (8.7) 17 (18.7) 11 (24.4)
Difference in response rate (95% CI)a NA 9.9 (0.3 to 19.6) 15.7 (2.0 to 29.4)
P valueb NA .04 .01

Abbreviations: CIPRO, ciprofloxacin alone; CIPRO+FLUO, ciprofloxacin plus fluocinolone acetonide; FLUO, fluocinolone acetonide alone; NA, not applicable.

a

Calculated as response rate for combined treatment–response rate for individual component.

b

Calculated using the Pearson χ2 test for independence between the combined treatment and each individual component. If the assumptions of the χ2 test were not met, the P value was calculated using the Fisher exact test.

c

Sustained microbiological cure is achieved when there is a response of eradication or presumed eradication at both visits 3 and 4. Patients who discontinued because of lack of efficacy or rescue medication use were considered to have experienced treatment failure.