Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 21;15:1606. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45842-7

Table 2.

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement and validation statistics

Closed conformation (EMDB-18120) (PDB 8Q3B) Stalka (EMDB-18264) Open conformationa (EMD-18163) Open conformation (composite map)a (EMDB-18129) (PDB 8Q3K)
Data collection and processingb
Magnification 105,000 - - -
Voltage (kV) 300 - - -
Electron exposure (e-/Å2) 48.152 - - -
Defocus range (μm) 1.5 - 2.7 - - -
Pixel size (Å) 0.828 - - -
Symmetry imposed C1 - - -
Initial particle images (no.) 4,842,857 - - -
Final particle images (no.) 467,000 467.519 352,192 n/a
Map resolution (Å) 2.69 2.99 2.92 n/a
  FSC threshold 0.143 0.143 0.143
Map resolution range (Å) n/ac 2.84 - 6.55 2.82 - 5.72 n/a
Refinement
Initial model used (PDB code) none - - 8Q3B
Model resolution (Å) 2.9 - - 3.0
  FSC threshold 0.143 0.143
Model resolution range (Å) 2.7 - 3.0 - 2.8 - 3.2
Map sharpening B factor (Å2) 113.15 70.28 84.87 n/a
Model composition - -
  Protein residues 3724 3633
  Ligands 1 Mg, 6 Zn 1 Mg, 6 Zn
B factors (Å2) - -
  Protein 83.16 94.15
  Ligand 140.13 174.54
R.m.s. deviations - -
  Bond lengths (Å) 0.003 0.003
  Bond angles (°) 0.552 0.511
Validation - -
  MolProbity score 1.23 1.29
  Clashscore 4.62 5.45
  Poor rotamers (%) 0.46 0.22
Ramachandran plot - -
  Favoured (%) 98.05 98.05
  Allowed (%) 1.95 1.95
  Disallowed (%) 0.00 0.00

aThe stalk (EMDB-18264) was obtained from the multibody refinement of the closed conformation and combined with the open conformation (EMDB-18163) to produce the composite map (EMDB-18129). Only the latter was used for the refinement.

bAll maps were obtained from the same dataset.

cThe local resolution evaluation was carried out in cryoSPARC which does not provide this information.