Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 30;39:330–343. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.01.014

Table 3.

T-test for paired samples: Comparison of Vectra M5-based and smartphone-based measurements (1)–(11) and (14)–(19); IBM SPSS 29 was used for data analysis.

T-test for paired samples
Variables Paired Differences
Mean Std. Deviation 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
p
Lower Upper
(1) N – GN -.2 3.7 -1.6 1.1 .73
(2) N – STO .5 2.0 -.2 1.3 .16
(3) SN – GN -.6 2.1 -1.4 .2 .15
(4) N – SN .5 1.8 -.2 1.2 .14
(5) AL – AL -.4 1.6 -1.0 .2 .19
(6) SN – PRN -.2 1.3 -.6 .3 .47
(7) N – PRN .3 1.7 -.3 .9 .36
(8) CH – CH .7 1.7 .1 1.4 .03
(9) SN – STO .2 1.3 -.3 .7 .45
(10) SN – LS -.2 1.0 -.5 .2 .39
(11) LS – STO .2 1.0 -.2 .5 .29
(14) AL – PRN (L) -.4 2.2 -1.2 .4 .35
(15) AL – PRN (R) -.4 1.5 -1.0 .1 .13
(16) SBAL – SN (L) -.3 1.3 -.8 .2 .22
(17) SBAL – SN (R) -.2 1.1 -.6 .2 .40
(18) SBAL – CPH (L) .1 .9 -.3 .4 .73
(19) SBAL – CPH (R) -.2 1.3 -.7 .2 .30