Table 2. Data extraction instrument.
| Study reference | |
| Author(s) | Authors of the paper as surname and initials |
| Publication date | Date that paper was published |
| Title | Title of the study |
| Study context | |
| Research question/aim | Summary of the stated aim of the study |
| Location of origin | Country in which the affiliation of the first author is based |
| Target population | List the specific population studied ( e.g., older adults, older adults and their family members) |
| Study methodology | |
| Study design | List the design of the study ( e.g., qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods) |
| Data collection method | List the method by which data was collected ( e.g., interviews, focus groups, questionnaires) |
| Study participants | |
| Sample size | Give exact N of participants who completed the study |
| Sample size of older adult population | Give exact N of older adult participants who completed the study |
| Participant characteristics | List demographics of older adult participants including age, gender, etc. |
| AAL technology under investigation | |
| Details of technology under
evaluation |
List the types of technology under study ( e.g., cameras, motion sensors) |
| Details of camera-based
AAL technology under evaluation |
List the type(s) of camera used in the camera-based AAL technology under study, where specified (
e.g.,
standard Red-Green-Blue camera, depth camera, thermal camera, etc.) |
| Context of evaluation and/
or use |
List the setting in which the camera-based AAL technology has been, or is expected to be, implemented |
| Data analysis | |
| Method of data analysis | List the methods by which data was analyzed ( e.g., frequency analysis, thematic analysis) |
| Study findings | |
| Summary of main findings
according to author(s) |
Extract main findings as reported by study author(s) |
| Outcome(s) | Extract outcome(s) of study as related to acceptance of the camera-based AAL technology under study.
Include details such as how acceptance is defined and measured ( e.g., acceptance, willingness-to-use, actual usage) |
| Key findings that relate to
the scoping review question |
Extract the name of the construct identified as a determinant of acceptance (or non-acceptance) of
the camera-based AAL technology under study. Accordingly, list whether the construct is a barrier or facilitator to acceptance. Where applicable, extract information relating to the prevalence ( i.e., percentage of participants identifying factor as barrier/facilitator to acceptance) and strength of the relationship ( i.e., measure of association between identified barrier/facilitator and acceptance) |
| TDF Domain | Code each determinant ( i.e., barrier and/or facilitator) to TDF domain(s) deemed relevant |