Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 20;37(1):e101311. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2023-101311

Table 1.

The relationship between dietary thiamine intake and cognitive decline using two-piecewise linear regression*

Inflection point, mg/day n Mean (SD) β (95% CI) P value R2
Estimate (95% CI)
Decline rate in global cognitive scores, points/5 years
Model 1
0.67 (0.51 to 0.82) 0.270
<0.67 570 2.89 (11.13) −7.43 (−18.79 to 3.93) 0.200
≥0.67 2536 2.09 (11.12) 3.10 (1.35 to 4.85) <0.001
Model 2
0.68 (0.56 to 0.80) 0.312
<0.68 617 2.80 (10.95) −7.13 (−18.77 to 4.50) 0.230
≥0.68 2489 2.09 (11.16) 4.24 (2.22 to 6.27) <0.001
Decline rate in composite cognitive scores, SU/5 years
Model 1
0.66 (0.52 to 0.81) 0.256
<0.66 527 0.43 (1.47) −0.90 (−2.50 to 0.70) 0.271
≥0.66 2579 0.29 (1.43) 0.33 (0.10 to 0.55) 0.005
Model 2
0.68 (0.56 to 0.80) 0.297
<0.68 617 0.40 (1.46) −1.00 (−2.56 to 0.56) 0.208
≥0.68 2489 0.29 (1.44) 0.49 (0.23 to 0.76) <0.001

p values less than 0.05 are shown in bold.

*Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, global score, as well as the intakes of carbohydrate, protein and fat. Model 2 was further adjusted for smoking, alcohol consumption, BMI, SBP, DBP, education level, occupation, region, urban or rural residency, self-reported diabetes, antihypertensive medicine, physical activity, as well as the intakes of fibre, sodium and potassium.

BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SD, standard deviation; SU, standard units by averaging z scores.