Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2024 Feb 21;159(5):586–588. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.7860

Electric Bicycle Injuries and Hospitalizations

Adrian M Fernandez 1, Kevin D Li 1, Hiren V Patel 1, Isabel Elaine Allen 2, Umar Ghaffar 1, Nizar Hakam 1, Benjamin N Breyer 1,2,
PMCID: PMC10882498  PMID: 38381444

Abstract

This cross-sectional study investigates injury trends associated with electric bicycles in the US from 2017 to 2022.


Electric bicycles (e-bicycles) are a popular consumer choice in the clean transportation revolution. Imports of e-bicycles topped 1.1 million in 2022 compared with 437 000 in 2020.1 We examined e-bicycle injuries and hospitalizations in the US from 2017 to 2022.

Methods

This cross-sectional study used data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), which provides estimates of patients with injuries presenting to US emergency departments. We queried NEISS for e-bicycle injuries (codes 5035 and 3215 and keywords electronic, electric, electrical, bike, bicycle, e-bike, e-bicycle, ebike, ebicycle, e bike, e bicycle, power, powered) between 2017 and 2022, excluding injuries from traditional bicycles, mopeds, motor bikes, electric scooters, and minibikes. Injury narratives were reviewed to identify helmet use. Narratives without mention of helmet status were excluded from helmet-related calculations. The NEISS complex sampling design was used to obtain US population projections of emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Stratified, weighted, nested, and year-adjusted estimates were calculated using the R survey package, version 4.3.1 (R Project for Statistical Computing). Estimates were log transformed and modeled using linear regression. We applied survey-weighted logistic regression to assess changes in injury patterns and odds of head injury. Helmet use between sexes was compared using the χ2 test with Rao-Scott second-order correction. A 2-sided P < .05 was considered significant. The study was exempt from institutional review board review according to the Common Rule, as the data used were public and deidentified.

Results

From 2017 to 2022, a weighted estimated total of 45 586 (95% CI, 17 079-74 094) e-bicycle injuries occurred in the US (1038 NEISS cases), leading to an estimated 5462 hospitalizations (95% CI, 2148-8777; 143 NEISS cases) (Table 1). There was a 30-fold rise in e-bicycle injuries (>99% annually; P < .001) and a 43-fold increase in hospitalizations (>108% annually; P < .001). Injuries in children increased from 0% to 13% of total injuries, while injuries in young adults aged 18 to 34 years decreased from 63% to 30% of total injuries (Table 2). The incidence of head trauma from e-bicycle accidents in 2022 was approximately 49 times higher than in 2017, increasing from approximately 163 (95% CI, 0-370) to approximately 7922 (95% CI, 4136-11 708) head injuries, a growth rate that outpaced overall e-bicycle injuries (Table 2). Odds of helmet use decreased by 5.6% each year (P = .01). Helmets were worn by 44% (6095 of 13 914) of injured e-bicyclists, at similar rates in men and women (44% vs 43%, P = .92). The odds of sustaining a head injury for nonhelmeted e-bicyclists were 1.9 times higher (95% CI, 1.25-2.84; P = .005) compared with those using helmets.

Table 1. E-Bicycle Injury and Hospitalization Estimates From 2017 to 2022a.

Trend 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Cumulative total
Injury cases
No. (95% CI) 751 (0-1586) 1615 (318-2912) 2215 (614-3815) 5627 (1107-10 147) 11 885 (3869-19 901) 23 493 (11 043-35 994) 45 586 (17 079-74 094)
Increase from 2017, % NA 115 195 649 1483 3028 NA
Hospitalizations
No. (95% CI) 66 (0-142) 235 (0-520) 188 (0-387) 558 (0-1154) 1519 (294-2743) 2897 (1154-4641) 5462 (2148-8777)
Increase from 2017, % NA 256 183 745 2202 4289 NA

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

a

Weighted estimates from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System.

Table 2. E-Bicycle Injury Characteristics From 2017 to 2022a.

Characteristic 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 % Change P Value
Patient demographics
Male sex
No. (95% CI) 518 (410-995) 1268 (61-2476) 1734 (274-3195) 4302 (163-8440) 8784 (2684-14 884) 14 884 (6381-28 358) NA .40
% (95% CI) 69 (35-90) 79 (51-93) 78 (51-93) 76 (58-88) 74 (68-79) 74 (64-82) 7
Female sex
No. (95% CI) 233 (0-631) 346 (73-620) 480 (40-920) 1325 (656-1995) 3101 (1032-5170) 6124 (4195-8053) NA .40
% (95% CI) 31 (10-65) 21 (7-49) 22 (7-49) 24 (12-42) 26 (21-33) 26 (18-36) −16
Age group
<18 y
No. (95% CI) 0 5 (0-15) 182 (0-407) 445 (120-769) 922 (359-1485) 3024 (1578-4471) NA .005
% (95% CI) 0 0 (0-3) 8 (2-32) 8 (4-16) 8 (5-13) 13 (8-20) 63
18-34 y
No. (95% CI) 477 (0-1046) 563 (0-1258) 1028 (0-2185) 2000 (0-4437) 4100 (336-7865) 7099 (1434-12763) NA .009
% (95% CI) 63 (40-82) 35 (16-61) 46 (22-72) 36 (21-54) 35 (24-46) 30 (22-41) −52
35-54 y
No. (95% CI) 83 (0-219) 640 (59-1221) 629 (148-1110) 1672 (198-3146) 3451 (675-6227) 7302 (2873-11 731) NA .61
% (95% CI) 11 (4-27) 40 (23-59) 28 (16-46) 30 (23-38) 29 (23-36) 31 (26-37) 182
≥55 y
No. (95% CI) 191 (0-396) 407 (76-737) 376 (17-736) 1510 (756-2264) 3411 (1832-4991) 6068 (3984-8152) NA .73
% (95% CI) 25 (8-57) 25 (9-55) 17 (5-42) 27 (14-46) 29 (18-42) 26 (19-35) 4
Type of hospital
Urban
No. (95% CI) 676 (0-1497) 1289 (45-2533) 2046 (461-3632) 4499 (36-8963) 9718 (1832-17 604) 18 497 (6265-30 730) NA .27
% (95% CI) 90 (30-99) 80 (42-96) 92 (70-98) 80 (54-93) 82 (60-93) 79 (62-89) −12
Rural
No. (95% CI) 76 (0-224) 321 (0-687) 163 (0-382) 1074 (362-1786) 2065 (630-3500) 4902 (2584-7220) NA .26
% (95% CI) 10 (1-70) 20 (4-57) 7 (1-31) 19 (6-45) 17 (7-39) 21 (10-38) 110
Children’s
No. (95% CI) 0 5 (0-15) 6 (0-16) 53 (29-78) 102 (34-170) 94 (26-162) NA .64
% (95% CI) 0 0 (0-3) 0 (0-2) 1 (0-2) 1 (0-2) 0 (0-1) 0
Type of injury
Head
No. (95% CI) 163 (0-370) 577 (73-1081) 485 (66-904) 1741 (427-3055) 3777 (1689-5864) 7922 (4136-11 708) NA .03
% (95% CI) 22 (6-55) 36 (22-53) 22 (9-44) 31 (24-39) 32 (24-40) 34 (29-39) 55
Trunk
No. (95% CI) 92 (0-243) 110 (0-234) 383 (0-1034) 720 (0-1476) 1409 (586-2232) 4049 (1227-6872) NA .11
% (95% CI) 12 (1-68) 7 (3-13) 17 (4-49) 13 (8-20) 12 (8-17) 17 (13-23) 42
Upper extremity
No. (95% CI) 235 (0-633) 546 (126-965) 804 (210-1398) 1550 (0-3108) 3511 (1155-5866) 5322 (2660-7984) NA .004
% (95% CI) 31 (10-64) 34 (12-65) 36 (20-57) 28 (20-37) 30 (26-34) 23 (19-27) −26
Lower extremity
No. (95% CI) 261 (0-571) 382 (0-961) 493 (53-933) 1560 (419-2700) 3057 (46-6068) 6076 (2347-9805) NA .89
% (95% CI) 35 (16-61) 24 (8-53) 22 (10-41) 28 (20-37) 26 (17-36) 26 (21-32) −26
Blunt soft tissue
No. (95% CI) 179 (0-387) 308 (10-607) 586 (46-1126) 1136 (108-2165) 3023 (556-5490) 6986 (2808-11 164) NA .07
% (95% CI) 24 (7-57) 19 (10-34) 26 (12-48) 20 (15-27) 25 (20-32) 30 (25-35) 20
Sharp soft tissue
No. (95% CI) 134 (0-398) 257 (0-591) 118 (0-285) 1564 (300-2828) 1579 (610-2548) 2761 (1246-4277) NA .06
% (95% CI) 18 (4-51) 16 (7-34) 5 (1-22) 28 (22-35) 13 (9-19) 12 (9-15) −33
Fracture or dislocation
No. (95% CI) 283 (0-687) 544 (129-959) 434 (94-775) 1732 (417-3047) 3252 (1311-5194) 6365 (3845-8886) NA .51
% (95% CI) 38 (17-64) 34 (9-72) 20 (11-33) 31 (23-40) 27 (22-34) 27 (19-36) −29
Internal organ
No. (95% CI) 79 (0-234) 260 (0-550) 374 (19-730) 507 (37-977) 1660 (696-2624) 3254 (1764-4745) NA .76
% (95% CI) 11 (1-72) 16 (7-32) 17 (7-37) 9 (5-17) 14 (9-22) 14 (10-19) 27
Unknown
No. (95% CI) 76 (0-224) 246 (0-695) 476 (0-1244) 627 (0-1412) 2115 (0-4388) 3655 (0-7406) NA .73
% (95% CI) 10 (1-70) 15 (4-46) 21 (6-54) 11 (6-19) 18 (11-28) 16 (9-27) 60
Helmet use
Yes
No. (95% CI) 83 (0-219) 268 (20-515) 333 (8-658) 941 (0-1972) 1986 (561-3410) 2484 (287-4682) NA .01
% (95% CI) 50 (33-67) 44 (14-79) 62 (36-83) 62 (42-78) 47 (32-62) 36 (30-43) −28
No
No. (95% CI) 83 (0-219) 337 (0-719) 202 (0-462) 578 (163-993) 2270 (0-4836) 4348 (513-8184) NA .01
% (95% CI) 50 (33-67) 55 (21-86) 38 (17-64) 38 (22-58) 53 (38-68) 64 (57-70) 28

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

a

Weighted estimates from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System.

Discussion

We found that health care use associated with e-bicycle injuries has surged in the US. This trend started in the early 2000s as e-bicycles emerged on the market2 and mirrors increasing health care use related to pedal-powered bicycles and electric scooters.3,4

This study corroborates prior findings that soft tissue injuries and fractures predominate among adult e-bicyclists.2 However, the increasing proportion of head injuries in our study warrants further examination, as traumatic brain injuries are more severe in e-bicyclists than in traditional bicyclists.5

The decrease in helmet use may be associated with increasing head injuries. Only 44% of injured e-bicyclists wore helmets, with proportionally fewer wearing helmets each year. Although helmet use by e-bicyclists varies worldwide, Swiss studies report helmet use as high as 69%.5 E-bicycle ride-sharing companies may not include helmets given rider preference and logistical challenges (accessibility, cost, hygiene, or safety concerns).

Study limitations include lack of detailed clinical information with each report. The incidence of e-bicycle–related injuries may be underestimated, as injured individuals may not seek medical care or may visit physicians outside the emergency department.

E-bicycle ridership may grow in the US as Congress considers extending the Inflation Reduction Act tax credits offered to electric car purchasers to e-bicycle buyers.6 The safety profiles of e-bicycles should be studied to promote a safe e-bicycle infrastructure and riding practices.

Supplement.

Data Sharing Statement

References

  • 1.Levin T. The incredible, Earth-saving electric bike is having a moment. Business Insider. Published May 24, 2023. Accessed August 22, 2023. https://www.businessinsider.com/electric-bikes-popularity-sustainability-evs-2023-4
  • 2.DiMaggio CJ, Bukur M, Wall SP, Frangos SG, Wen AY. Injuries associated with electric-powered bikes and scooters: analysis of US consumer product data. Inj Prev. 2020;26(6):524-528. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Namiri NK, Lui H, Tangney T, Allen IE, Cohen AJ, Breyer BN. Electric scooter injuries and hospital admissions in the United States, 2014-2018. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(4):357-359. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sanford T, McCulloch CE, Callcut RA, Carroll PR, Breyer BN. Bicycle trauma injuries and hospital admissions in the United States, 1998-2013. JAMA. 2015;314(9):947-949. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baschera D, Jäger D, Preda R, et al. Comparison of the incidence and severity of traumatic brain injury caused by electrical bicycle and bicycle accidents—a retrospective cohort study from a Swiss level I trauma center. World Neurosurg. 2019;126:e1023-e1034. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.E-BIKE Act, HR 1685, 118th Congress (2023-2024). Published March 21, 2023. Accessed August 22, 2023. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/1685

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement.

Data Sharing Statement


Articles from JAMA Surgery are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES