Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 22;21:12. doi: 10.1186/s12014-024-09455-y

Table 2.

Comparison of regulatory requirement among CLSI, LDTS, and TAF for analytical performance in developing a LC-MS assay. TFDA-LDTS: Taiwan Food and Drug Administration; TAF: Taiwan Accreditation Foundation; CLSI: Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute

Item TFDA-LDTS TAF-CNLA-G38 CLSI-C64Ed1E
I Tracebility
II Accuracy 8.10
Trueness (bias) 8.10
Method comparison 8.10
Patient comparison
III Precision 8.2
Reproducibility 8.2
Repeatability
Measurement uncertainty
IV Reportable range
Linearity interval 8.4.1
Measuting interval
Dilution verification 8.4.2
V Sensitivity 8.3
Cut-off value 8.12
Limit of detection (LOD)
Limit of quantitation (LOQ)
Carry over 8.8
VI Specificity 8.7
Interfering substances 8.7
Matrix effects 8.7
Matrix comparison 8.11
VII Stability 8.5/8.6
Ion transition ratios 8.9
Ruggedness 8.13.1
Reagent lot changes 8.13.2