Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 22;24:46. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02163-z

Table 4.

Barriers to participation and drop-out or refusal rates of participants

Reasons for refusal to participate or drop-out Proportion of participants who refuse participation References
Appointment non-attendance 14.0% of passive refusals [40]
2.1% of males that refused to participate [58]
1.3% of males were unable to cope with study requirements due to old age [58]
Comprehension of the study requirements 0.4% of males refused to participate [58]
Cannot be bothered/not interested 27.8% of active refusals [40]
13.8% declined to participate [41]
66.7% refused to participate [44]
39.6% males that refused to participate [58]
18.5% of eligible participants [49]
Did not meet inclusion criteria 87% of eligible participants [49]
Time commitment 38.9% of active refusals [40]
26.3% of males that refused to participate [58]
Invasion of privacy 0.3% of males that refused to participate [58]
Medical 15.5% of participants who refused to participate [57]
35.6% of participants unable to attend due to illness, 0.2% of participants had limited medical information [40]
16.9% of males that refused to participate [58]
Unable to contact/no response 35.0% of eligible participants [40]
17.4% of eligible participants [41]
40.7% of invited male participants [61]
Psychopathology factors 0.8% of males refused to participant in case a medical problem was uncovered [58]
Reluctance over medical testing 1.1% of males that refused to participate [58]
Religious/philosophical reasons 0.1% of males that refused to participate [58]
Third party involvement 62.2% of participants passively refused via a relative, 15.9% of participants passively refused by resident/nursing home [40]
18.4% transferred to another ward or discharged from hospital or research nurse forgot to ask [44]
Unknown reason/personal reason 5.2% of males that refused to participate [58]
9.5% of eligible participants in 1968 [45]
28.6% of active refusals [40]
3.2% of eligible participants [41]
3.6% of eligible participants [49]
Proportion of participants who were non-completers/Further suggestions for improvements by completing participants
Appointment non-attendance 3.2% of non-completers [41]
24.7% missed at least one visit by end of study (12 months) [52]
Quantitative data- in person visits were difficult to attend due to the distance of the centre [53]
Communication Qualitative data- better coordination of communication for study results to participants [38, 49]
Qualitative data- increased personalisation would increase engagement like a personal question the participants could contemplate over the next week [49]
Qualitative data- increase of data sharing between research team, treatment therapist and each participant would have increased engagement and data tracking over the period [49]
Education Qualitative data- Increasing the education around the condition that is the focus of the trial [38]
Medical 12.7% non-completers [57]
4.1% of non-completers had a child that had an additional diagnosis [51]
Qualitative data- state of the participants personal health and the nature of the intervention may affect future enrolment [38]
Situational (lack of reliable housing, moving, death) 1.4% of non-completers [57]
95.2% of non-completers [42]
1.4% of non-completers from wave 1 (1974) to 47.3% in wave 5 (2011) [45]
6.8% to 30.6% of non-completers across 6 different centres [61]
25.7% of non-completers moved, 5.4% of families had a child who died [51]
21.4% of non-completers died, 17.4% moved away [36]
2.3%—9.4% of non-completers (wave 1–5) [39]
Qualitative data- unable to complete exercise or have appropriate meal preparation [53]
63.4% of non-completers [55]
35.5% of non-completers died [48]
Inability to adhere to study activities Qualitative data- unable to complete training due to unreliable technology [53]
12.7% of non-completers [57]
10.1% did not receive allocation of intervention [41]
1.7% of non-completers did not like research assessment, 0.8% of non-completers were incarcerated [48]
Cannot be bothered/ loss of interest/wanted to withdraw 40.8% of non-completers [36]
9.5% of non-completers [51]
3.2% of non-completers [44]
20.6% of non-completers [61]
13.2% of non-completers [48]
Difficulty to arrange follow-up appointments with participants 6.8% of non-completers [51]
20.6% of non-completers [48]
Missing data/incomplete data 6.5% of participants [41]
52.5% of participants did not complete the final postal survey, 0.36% of participants did not have available data in the Finnish national Care Register for Health Care [44]
15.0% of non-completers [61]
3.1% of participants [43]
Time commitment 5.6% of non-completers [57]
17.6% of non-completers [51]
Qualitative data- competing demands in personal life, unable to prioritize program participation [53]
Qualitative data- 24-h urine output collection during work hours was difficult and restrictive, taking days of work and losing wages [38]
Lost contact 8.5% of non-completers [57]
27.8% of non-completers [44]
1.7% of non-completers [48]
Unknown reason/personal reason 7.0% of non-completers [57]
4.8% of non-completers [42]
4.8% of non-completers [44]
21.6% of non-completers [51]
20.9% of non-completers from wave 1 (1974) to 24.1% in wave 5 (2011) [45]
10.7% of non-completers [56]
57.5% of non-completers were lost by 1-year follow up [46]
16.5% of non-completers [48]
Difficulty in comprehending the study 2.7% of non-completers [51]
Qualitative data- reducing length and complexity of questionnaires and understanding the potential risks [38]
Psychopathology factors Paranoid factor had an elevated but non-significant risk for early drop out (26.9%) Dysphoric Borderline factor put a significant risk for late dropout (15.9%) [50]
Qualitative data- side effects from medications for mental health or chronic pain were issues in completing the program. Social anxiety of talking openly to other participants also prohibited some participants interaction [53]
Third party involvement 6.8% of non-completers – due to family issues [51]
Qualitative data- consider withdrawing when family was sick [38]
4.2% of non-completers—Work and family responsibilities [48]
Financial Hardship Qualitative data- participants across all treatment groups found recommendations of what to eat and how to exercise cost prohibitive [53]
Qualitative data- providing monetary incentives [38]
Technical Issues Qualitative data- difficulties in troubleshooting web-based program after logging in as well as printing physical activity log [53]