Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 1;95(5):387–388. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.12.009

A new look at gray-matter decreases in chronic pain

Tor D Wager 1,*, Katerina Zorina-Lichtenwalter 2, Naomi P Friedman 3
PMCID: PMC10882984  NIHMSID: NIHMS1965988  PMID: 38325916

Scientific views on chronic pain have evolved dramatically over the past decades. It is increasingly clear that many types of chronic pain are promoted and maintained by changes in the brain that can occur after injury or insult to the body. These include remodeling of neural pathways, glial changes, and neuroinflammation (1). Central nervous system (CNS) alterations can cause pain to spread beyond an initial site of injury, making it a systemic rather than a localized disorder. Co-occurring pain across body sites and etiologies is linked to shared genetic susceptibilities and common functional changes in the brain (2,3). Given that chronic pain is a strong risk factor for other mental health conditions (3), including depression, anxiety, substance use disorders, and suicide, it is critical to understand structural and functional brain changes with chronic pain and their relationships with these co-occuring conditions. A recent paper by Bhatt et al. (4) takes an important step forward in addressing this need in one of the largest, well-powered, and most convincing analyses of brain gray-matter changes in chronic pain to date.

One crucial piece of the puzzle of chronic pain lies in brain structural changes in human MRI studies. Early studies reported dramatic reductions in MRI measures of gray-matter density linked to chronic pain (5), which have been interpreted in terms of damage to emotional and self-regulatory systems. Such brain alterations could help to explain chronic pain. For example, they could create a positive feedback loop between pain and psychological/behavioral changes that support it, including fear, depression, and withdrawal. However, these effects were identified in small, underpowered studies, with inevitable confounds such as substance and medication use, body fat, mood disorders, and head movement. In addition, while early meta-analyses identified consistent gray-matter changes, more recent, larger ones have failed to find evidence for consistent changes at the statistical thresholds needed to correct for multiple comparisons across the brain (6). Nevertheless, they suggest there may be gray-matter decreases in the medial prefrontal cortex and anterior insula in particular (6) – regions important for self-regulation and influences on behavior and bodily physiology based on cognitive appraisals. Thus, it remains to be determined (1) whether brain gray-matter is altered with chronic pain; (2) if so, which regions are affected in which pain conditions; (3) whether these effects are driven by other co-occurring variables; and (4) whether these effects mediate the relationship between chronic pain and co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders.

To shed light on these questions, the recent paper by Bhatt and colleagues (4) analyzed data from the UK Biobank to compare MRI measures of regional gray matter in 10,984 participants with chronic pain and 10,984 pain-free controls that were carefully matched on age and sex. They found widespread reductions in cortical surface area (but not thickness or subcortical volume) across conditions on average and an increase in cortical thickness in the precuneus and lateral orbitofrontal cortices. Localized chronic pain was associated most strongly with reductions in somatosensory, motor, dorsal anterior insula, and posterior medial (i.e., posterior cingulate) regions. These include many of the regions most strongly associated with sensory and interoceptive processing. Multisite chronic pain was associated with stronger reductions overall and particularly with reductions in medial prefrontal, lateral fronto-parietal, and lateral temporal cortices. Though these patterns were not directly statistically compared, the different patterns are suggestive of changes in somatosensory systems with both localized and widespread pain and additional changes in systems associated with higher-level context-based regulation of cognition and behavior for widespread pain. Somatosensory, motor, and medial prefrontal cortices are the origins of descending pathways that can modify how nociceptive (pain-related) signals are processed in the brainstem and spinal cord (1), suggesting that chronic pain may involve disruption of closed-loop feedback circuits that normally inhibit pain, creating a pain-facilitatory shift.

In addition to more careful matching of controls than previous studies, the sample size (4 times as large as the total sample size contributing to the largest previous meta-analysis) allowed Bhatt et al. to analyze changes associated with pain both unique to specific body sites and common across body sites, as well as associations with suicide. Regional surface area reductions were most strongly associated with chronic musculoskeletal pain, including back, neck, knee, and hip pain. No reductions with headaches or abdominal pain were reported. Instead, headaches stood out as associated with widespread increases in cortical thickness (and no decreases), and abdominal pain stood out by being the only condition to be associated with subcortical volume differences in left amygdala, brainstem, and cerebellum. These patterns were not directly compared, and the effect sizes may be too small to allow statistically robust comparisons even in this large sample. Nevertheless, the results suggest that a ‘one size fits all’ approach is insufficient to describe pain-associated gray matter changes, and that different supra-nociceptive mechanisms may contribute to maintenance of different forms of chronic pain.

The empirical foundation provided by Bhatt et al.’s study paves the way for future studies to address important unanswered questions. What is the functional significance of these changes? Do they constitute “damage” to the brain, as some have claimed, or are they normal adaptations to pain that promote behavioral withdrawal and recovery (7)? Are they related to mental health symptoms, neuroinflammation, and/or the neural remodeling seen after nerve injury in nonhuman animals? Are they related to accelerated aging, and do they interact with other factors that promote premature aging (8)?

One unique contribution of Bhatt et al.’s study is in understanding relationships with suicide, which is strongly related to pain and depression. Among the areas with pain-linked gray matter changes, precuneus emerged as a mediator of suicide attempts. Along with the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, the precuneus may be part of a system that is responsible self-referential thought and construction of feelings, and which undergoes a shift towards negative internal states in those at risk for suicide (9). Studies of direct brain intervention in the precuneus and inter-connected regions would provide a way of both validating this association and translating neuroimaging findings to clinical interventions.

Even with the relatively careful controls in Bhatt et al.’s study, there are important issues that must be addressed in future studies. As Bhatt et al. note, their findings do not address whether structural changes play a causal role in contributing to pain and related mental health and substance use problems. While a few small studies have suggested gray matter changes are reversible with successful treatment, the magnitude of treatment effects is unknown. Even if changes are reversible, they may still play a causal role in maintaining pain and dysfunction. In addition, the effects Bhatt et al. identify are small, and it is unclear whether there are reproducible differences across body sites and pain conditions. It is possible that the different patterns of regional associations they report are artifacts of thresholding small effects and are not reliably different. Furthermore, though the study’s sample matching process and exclusion of people with mental health conditions and obesity represents a valiant effort to control for some confounders, it is possible that some of the observed changes are related to differences in brain water content (10), head movement (which can blur local signals), and other factors related to BMI, stress, mental health, and use of medications and other drugs. Future analyses assessing whether these other variables are plausible mediators, and converging evidence from animal models, pain treatment studies, direct neurological interventions, and quantitative MRI (10) will help clarify the role of pain per se in altering brain structure.

In summary, Bhatt et al. have provided some of the most comprehensive, large-sample evidence for gray-matter associations with pain to date, with potential differences across body sites and associations with suicide risk. The study represents an important step in understanding how the brain changes with, and contributes to, chronic pain, and provides a launching point for future studies using converging methodologies.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants R01 DA046064 (Wager, Friedman), R21AT012431 (Wager), and MH076136 (Wager).

Footnotes

Disclosures

Dr. Wager is on the Scientific Advisory Board for Curable Health, Inc., and has received consulting fees from the Flomenhaft Law Firm. He is a holder of U.S. patents 2020/63/078,498 and 2021/10,881,322 on neuroimaging biomarkers for pain. Dr. Zorina-Lichtenwalter and Dr. Friedman have nothing to disclose.

References

  • 1.Tan LL, Kuner R (2021): Neocortical circuits in pain and pain relief. Nat Rev Neurosci 22: 458–471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zorina-Lichtenwalter K, Bango CI, Van Oudenhove L, Čeko M, Lindquist MA, Grotzinger AD, et al. (2023): Genetic risk shared across 24 chronic pain conditions: identification and characterization with genomic structural equation modeling. Pain 164: 2239–2252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tanguay-Sabourin C, Fillingim M, Guglietti GV, Zare A, Parisien M, Norman J, et al. (2023): A prognostic risk score for development and spread of chronic pain. Nat Med 29: 1821–1831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bhatt RR, Haddad E, Zhu AH, Thompson PM, Gupta A, Mayer EA, Jahanshad N (2023): Mapping Brain Structure Variability in Chronic Pain: The Role of Widespreadness and Pain Type and Its Mediating Relationship With Suicide Attempt. Biol Psychiatry. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.07.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Apkarian AV, Sosa Y, Sonty S, Levy RM, Harden RN, Parrish TB, Gitelman DR (2004): Chronic back pain is associated with decreased prefrontal and thalamic gray matter density. J Neurosci 24: 10410–10415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Henn AT, Larsen B, Frahm L, Xu A, Adebimpe A, Scott JC, et al. (2023): Structural imaging studies of patients with chronic pain: an anatomical likelihood estimate meta-analysis. Pain 164: e10–e24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Seymour B, Crook RJ, Chen ZS (2023): Post-injury pain and behaviour: a control theory perspective. Nat Rev Neurosci 24: 378–392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cruz-Almeida Y, Fillingim RB, Riley JL 3rd, Woods AJ, Porges E, Cohen R, Cole J (2019): Chronic pain is associated with a brain aging biomarker in community-dwelling older adults. Pain 160: 1119–1130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schmaal L, van Harmelen A-L, Chatzi V, Lippard ETC, Toenders YJ, Averill LA, et al. (2020): Imaging suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a comprehensive review of 2 decades of neuroimaging studies. Mol Psychiatry 25: 408–427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pomares FB, Funck T, Feier NA, Roy S, Daigle-Martel A, Ceko M, et al. (2017): Histological Underpinnings of Grey Matter Changes in Fibromyalgia Investigated Using Multimodal Brain Imaging. J Neurosci 37: 1090–1101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES