Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 19;12:e16919. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16919

Table 2. Spatial–temporal gait parameters and respective variabilities.

The one-way repeated ANOVA measure without adding preferred walking speed was used to investigate the effect of treadmill-induced perturbations with/without full vision support on step length, step length variability, step width, and step width variability. The post-hoc comparisons were corrected by Bonferroni correction.

Norm Slip Slip_Vision Blocked Effect Norm vs. Slip Slip vs. Slip_Vision Blocked Norm vs. Slip_Vision Block
Step length (mm) 578.73 (68.27) 572.71 (69.62) 574.92 (75.24) F = 0.258, p = 0.775 NA NA NA
Step length variability (%) 3.76 (0.88) 7.33 (2.21) 7.65 (1.36) F = 52.208, p < 0.001 p < 0.001 NS p < 0.001
Step width (mm) 116.81 (28.61) 120.75 (24.48) 130.01 (25.48) F = 18.462, p < 0.001 NS p < 0.001 p < 0.001
Step width variability (mm) 14.33 (2.76) 16.00 (3.88) 19.27 (3.62) F = 31.152, p < 0.001 p = 0.02 p = 0.001 p < 0.001

Notes.

Norm
the control condition, walking normally with their preferred walking speed on the treadmill;
Slip
the treadmill-induced perturbation with full vision condition, walking on the varied-treadmill-belt-speeds with full vision support
Slip_VisionBlocked
the treadmill-induced perturbation without full vision condition, walking on the varied-treadmill-belt-speeds without full visual support
NA
not available, the effect of different conditions did not reach the statistical significance
NS
not significant

Data are shown as mean (standard deviation).