Skip to main content
Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery logoLink to Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery
. 2024 Jan 15;13(2):167–172. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_140_23

Effectiveness of Diode Laser in Intraoral Soft Tissue Surgeries - An Evaluative Study

Pratap N Movaniya 1,, Nimisha N Desai 1, Tushar R Makwana 2, Riddhi G Matariya 2, Kalpesh G Makwana 3, Hirakben B Patel 4, Yama N Patel 3
PMCID: PMC10883202  PMID: 38405572

Abstract

Introduction:

The clinical application of the diode laser seems to have beneficial effects in surgery. The laser provides precise and rapid tissue dissection, excellent haemostasis and lessens post-operative inflammation. This study was done to assess the clinical effectiveness of diode laser in the management of different varieties of intraoral soft-tissue lesions.

Materials and Methods:

After applying exclusion criteria, a total of 50 samples were selected with benign intraoral soft-tissue lesions treated with a diode laser under local anaesthesia between September 2017 and September 2020. Each patient was followed up on the 3rd, 7th and 15th post-operative days for healing, pain, infection and swelling.

Results:

From all patients, a total of 50 were evaluated in the study; out of all, 60% of patients had no pain on the 2nd follow-up. As per the Landry Index of Healing, 54% of patients had excellent healing. None of the cases had post-operative bleeding, infection was present in 4% at the 1st–2nd follow-up, and in 2% of cases, post-operative swelling was present. The efficacy of diode lasers was tested using the Chi-square test and P < 0.01, which was statistically significant.

Discussion:

Diode laser seems to be superior over conventional treatment modalities as it provides a bloodless dry field and increases patient comfort during surgery. It also lessens the post-operative pain and swelling. Diode laser can safely and effectively be used as a treatment modality for benign soft-tissue lesions, without any complication and without compromising the health and function of patients.

Keywords: Diode laser, intraoral surgery, soft tissue

INTRODUCTION

The inclusion of lasers in oral and maxillofacial surgery has been since the mid-1960s.[1,2,3] A laser is a device that emits light (electromagnetic radiation) through a process of optical amplification based on the stimulated emission of photons.[4] Its effects on the biological tissue depend on the wavelength of the monochromatic light that can be reflected, scattered or absorbed.[5] The advantages of laser are precise and rapid tissue dissection, a bloodless field due to sealing of blood vessels, so it reduces the surgical site morbidity and lessens the post-operative inflammatory sequelae such as pain, swelling and post-operative infection; hence, it offers excellent patient acceptance.[6,7,8,9] Lasers are being widely used for intraoral soft-tissue procedures, including gingivectomy, frenectomy, gingivoplasty, gingival depigmentation, epulis, benign tumour removal, second-stage implant exposure, irradiation of aphthous ulcer, coagulation of free gingival graft of donor sites and soft-tissue crown lengthening.[5,10,11,12,13,14]

In this study, various soft-tissue lesions have been included and treated with a diode laser, and the result was evaluated. The diode laser has high absorption in tissues pigmented with haemoglobin, melanin and collagen chromophores and low absorption in dental hard tissues with a cutting depth of 2–6 mm.[15]

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This evaluative study was conducted after approval of the protocol by the Institutional Review Board (No. KSDEC/17-18/Apr/29); a total of 50 patients were selected as per the exclusion criteria of the study from September 2017 to September 2020. Follow-up was taken of patients on the 3rd, 7th and 15th day postoperatively to assess pain, wound healing and post-operative complication. The efficacy of diode lasers was tested by the use of the Chi-square test and P < 0.01, which is a statistically and clinically significant value.

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of diode lasers in the management of soft-tissue intraoral lesions. The main objectives are to check for bleeding at the surgical site during and after treatment, to check for post-operative pain, infection and healing and to check for tissue scarring and patient acceptance.

Inclusion criteria included benign soft-tissue lesions irrespective of size, site and shape, random patients irrespective of age, sex, aetiology and socio-economic status, lesions that can be managed under local anaesthesia and patients agreeable for follow up. Exclusion criteria was malignant lesions.

Fifty patients on the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study and thus different patients of soft-tissue intraoral lesions were selected. The patients underwent laser treatment with the removal of soft-tissue lesions with a diode laser tip. Patients were followed up on the 3rd, 7th and 15th post-operative days for healing, pain, infection and swelling.

The patients selected for the study underwent ablation by diode laser. Local anaesthesia with adrenaline (1:100,000) infiltration was given at the site of the lesion. Pre-surgical workup with betadine was done. Laser ablation was done with a diode laser unit having a wavelength of 980 nm; input voltage DC 26V/4A and fibre core diameter ≥ 200 μm were used in continuous mode (paint brush manner) with light hands and lesion gradually ablated from mucosa by thermal energy. A gauze piece wet with normal saline was used to keep wiping out the ablated tissue so that a clear surgical field was easily maintained. The wound was allowed to heal secondarily.

Pre-operative and post-operative pain, haemostasis and healing were followed up on the 3rd post-operative day. Healing after seven days and 15 days was indexed on the basis of the Healing Index by Landry and pain measure with a Visual Analogue Scale.

RESULTS

In this study, we have used a diode laser 980 nm wavelength to treat 50 patients with various oral soft-tissue lesions [Table 1 and Figures 1-4].

Table 1.

Details of all patients included in the study

Soft tissue lesion Number of patients (%)
Fibroma 18 (36)
Leucoplakia 13 (26)
Pyogenic granuloma 7 (14)
Mucocele 6 (12)
Tooth exposure 3 (6)
Papilloma 2 (4)
Verrucous hyperplasia 1 (2)
Total 50

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Case 1 - MUCOCELE excision. (a) Pre-operative photograph. (b) Immediate after excision. (c) Follow-up after 3 days. (d) Follow-up after 7 days. (e) Follow-up after 15 days

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Case 5, 6 - Excision of verrucous hyperplasia (a-c), correction of the flabby ridge (d-f). (a and d) Pre-operative photograph. (b and e) Immediate after excision. (c and f) Follow-up after 15 days

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Case 2 - FIBROMA excision. (a) Pre-operative photograph. (b) Immediate after excision (c) Follow-up after 3 days (d) Follow-up after 7 days. (e) Follow-up after 15 days

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Case 3, 4 - Ablation of leucoplakia (a-c) and excision of pyogenic granuloma (d-f). (a and d) Pre-operative photograph. (b and e) Immediate after excision. (c and f) Follow-up after 15 days

Seven (14%) patients had mild pain (burning sensation), 2 (4%) patients had moderate pain and 41 (82%) patients had no sensation during laser application. Thirty-seven (74%) patients had noticed mild-to-moderate (nagging uncomfortable) pain, 3 (6%) patients had moderate pain and 10 (20%) patients had no pain on the 1st follow-up (3rd post-operative day). Twenty (40%) patients had mild annoying pain to discomfort, and 30 (60%) patients had no pain on the 2nd follow-up (7th post-operative day). None of the patients had pain on the 15th post-operative day [Table 2].

Table 2.

Pain assessment on the basis of the Visual Analogue Scale

Pain

VAS Intraoperative (pain/burning sensation), n (%) Post- operative day 3, n (%) Post- operative day 7, n (%) Post- operative day 15, n (%)
0 41 (82) 10 (20) 30 (60) 50 (100)
1–3 7 (14) 37 (74) 20 (40) 0
4–6 2 (4) 3 (6) 0 0
7–9 0 0 0 0
10 0 0 0 0

0: No pain, 1–3: Mild, 4–6: Moderate, 7–9: Severe, 10: Worst pain, VAS: Visual Analogue Scale

Seventeen (34%) patients had poor, 30 (60%) patients had good and three (6%) patients had very good healing according to the Landry index on the 1st follow-up (3rd post-operative day). Two (4%) patients had poor, 12 (24%) patients had good, 28 (66%) patients had very good and 8 (16%) patients had very good healing according to the Landry index on the 2nd follow-up (7th post-operative day). Two (4%) patients had good, 21 (42%) patients had very good and 27 (54%) patients had excellent healing according to the Landry index on the 3rd follow-up (15th post-operative day) [Table 3].

Table 3.

Assessment of healing

Healing

Healing index Post-operative 3 day, n (%) Post-operative 7 day, n (%) Post-operative 15 day, n (%)
1 0 0 0
2 17 (34) 2 (4) 0
3 30 (60) 12 (24) 2 (4)
4 3 (6) 28 (56) 21 (42)
5 0 8 16) 27 (54)

Healing index by Landry - 1: Very poor, 2: Poor, 3: Good, 4: Very good, 5: Excellent

Thirteen (26%) out of 50 patients had mild bleeding intraoperatively. Post-operative bleeding was not seen in any of the patients out of 50 [Table 4].

Table 4.

Post-operative complication

Post-operative Complaints Number of patients, n (%) Follow up
Bleeding post-operative 0 0
Swelling 1 (2) Post-operative 3rd day, 7th day
Infection 2 (4) Post-operative 3rd day, 7th day

Infection - 1: No, 2: Mild, 3: Moderate, 4: Severe, Swelling - 1: No, 2: Mild, 3: Moderate, 4: Severe, Bleeding - 0: No bleeding, 1: Mild bleeding

There was only one case of angioliomyoma in which suturing was done. Post-operative complications infection was present in 2 (4%) patients on the 3rd and 7th post-operative days, and in 1 (2%) patient, post-operative swelling was present [Table 4].

DISCUSSION

This study presents our clinical experience from the application of diode laser (980 nm) in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Various kinds of lasers [Carbon dioxide lasers, Nd: YAG lasers, Ho: YAG lasers, Er: YAG lasers, Alexandrite lasers Argon, KTP] are used in different surgeries, but CO2, Nd: YAG and Diode lasers are used in the oral cavity most frequently.[16,17,18,19,20,21]

Lasers provide improved haemostasis through enhanced coagulation [Table 4]. Similar studies have been done by Koppolu et al., and Reddy et al., showing similar results.[22,23] Coagulation occurs when tissue absorbs a controlled heat build-up, resulting in coagulation of blood proteins and sealing of small diameter vessels. At a temperature above 60°C, enzymes, cytokines and other bioactive molecules are instantly denatured due to photocoagulation.[4,22,23] Laser damage to erythrocytes attracts a population of platelets which encourage intraluminal thrombosis, further decreasing the blood loss. This explains why the laser wound had minimal blood loss in comparison to the scalpel, and this is especially important in our study because lasers provide excellent haemostasis.[23]

There was one case of angioliomyoma in this study, which required suturing. During soft-tissue procedures, adequate haemostasis is produced without the need for sutures. Care should be exercised to avoid collateral thermal damage from excessive power and pulse repetition rate.[24,25]

Statistically significant less pain is noticed after the 7th–15th post-operative day [Table 2]. Similar studies have been done by Pradeep Koppolu and Reddy et al., showing similar results.[21,22,23] The study done by White JM et al., in which patients received both Nd: YAG laser and scalpel surgical techniques; most laser-treated sites evoked minimal discomfort without anaesthesia, while scalpel surgery required anaesthesia. Reports of pain relief mechanisms appear to originate in stimulating oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria and through modulating inflammatory responses. Various studies reports of positive patient responses to laser treatment are usually dismissed by critics because of the impossibility of implementing a controlled study.[26]

Since a predominant cause of dental disease is attributed to pathogenic bacteria, treatment success involves reducing micro-organisms. Using lasers for surgical techniques can produce tissue temperatures effective for reducing bacteria. However, bacterial reduction has been found to occur at temperatures as low as 50°C. Furthermore, bacterial reduction has been demonstrated in both in vitro and in vivo clinical studies. Antimicrobial activity occurs primarily through photothermal effects due to absorption.[24,27]

It is generally accepted that opportunistic bacteria can contribute to post-operative infections. Treatment success often involves reducing such pathogenic bacterial species through prescribed antibiotics and rinses. Because laser energy has been shown to reduce bacteria, fewer risks of post-operative infections occur.[25,27] In this study, infection was present in two patients on the 3rd and 7th post-operative days, and in one patient, post-operative swelling was present [Table 4].

The optimal appearance of a post-operative laser surgical site will be pink in the zone of ablation that may be accompanied by a superficial layer of coagulum, which may serve to protect the surface. Depending on different laser parameters and the type of wavelength, coagulum layers can range from 0.01 to 1.0 mm thick, which aids in haemostasis. As healing occurs, regardless of device, physiologically, a zone of reversible oedema surrounds the surgical site.[24,28] In a study comparing wound healing after scalpel, electrosurgery and Nd: YAG laser surgery in beagle dogs, it was shown that surgical sites appeared to be clinically healed 14 days postoperatively.[24,29] However, histologically, the electrosurgery site continued to have a high degree of inflammatory infiltrate. Immediately, postoperatively, the laser can offer protection to the surgical site through a coagulum surface and, as mentioned previously, bacterial reduction. Studies have shown additional benefits with laser use, such as minimal wound contraction and minimal scarring when compared to scalpel surgery.[27,28,29,30]

Out of 50 cases, five cases were of leucoplakia in buccal mucosa, in which a second application of laser was required. Different definitions for recurrence may result in different rates reported in the literature.[31,32,33] Similar results are shown in studies by Yang et al., and Monteiro et al., some patients treated with laser can recur. Chiesa et al., concluded in their study that the age of the operated patients and the size of resected lesions are significantly predictive for the development of relapses and new leucoplakia.[34,35] The small portable size of the unit is beneficial for the surgeons, and apart from that, diode laser is more economical than other lasers. An additional advantage of laser use in practice is the psychological effect on the patient. It instils greater confidence in the mind of the patient for the doctor who is seen as using the latest and sophisticated equipment for treatment.[35]

CONCLUSION

Good intraoperative haemostasis is achieved following the application of a diode laser, thereby avoiding the use of sutures that, in turn, significantly reduces the time of surgery. Post-operative pain was also significantly reduced, and no signs of post-operative infection were noticed when compared to surgical excision. Thus, the application of diode laser shows excellent results with healing and hence can be used in the management of oral soft-tissue lesions.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gáspár L. The use of high-power lasers in oral surgery. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1994;12:281–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Parker S. Verifiable CPD paper: Introduction, history of lasers and laser light production. Br Dent J. 2007;202:21–31. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2006.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Convissar RA, Fagd D. New York: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2022. Principles and Practice of Laser Dentistry-E-book. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chan AS, Chan AG, Dawes JM, Chan AJ, Chan A. Quantifying light energy from 450 nm, 650 nm, 810 nm, and 980 nm wavelength lasers delivered through dental hard tissue. Lasers Dent Sci. 2022;6:89–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shaik KV, Alanazi MI, Albilasi RM, Albalawi BF, Alruwaili FA. Lasers in maxillofacial surgery –Review of literature. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13:S19–22. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_710_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bonelli J, Ortega-Forte E, Rovira A, Bosch M, Torres O, Cuscó C, et al. Improving photodynamic therapy anticancer activity of a mitochondria-targeted coumarin photosensitizer using a polyurethane-polyurea hybrid nanocarrier. Biomacromolecules. 2022;23:2900–13. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c00361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shivhare P, Haidry N, Kumar A, Parihar A, Singh A, Subramanyam S. Diode laser in the management of leukoplakia –A retrospective study. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2022;12:178–84. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_117_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yeragi E. LASER physics and its application in dentistry dental and medical sciences IOSR A review. IOSR J JDMS. 2019;18:33–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sarhan MM. Revolutionizing oral surgery: The benefits of diode laser for soft tissue lesion removal. J Clin Images Med Case Rep. 2023;4:2390. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Subedi S, Ranjit R, Bista S. Vestibuloplasty using diode laser: A case report. J Nepal Soc Periodontol Oral Implantol. 2021;5:97–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Silva Mancera IC, Triana Escobar FE, Soto Llanos L. Excision of a traumatic fibroma with diode laser in a pediatric patient: Case report. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioquia. 2019;31:162–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Aboud SS, Taha HJ, Mardan B. Periodontal pocket treatment with diode laser 940 nm. Int J Health Sci. 2022;6:12291–303. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Maheshwari S, Jaan A, Vyaasini CS, Yousuf A, Arora G, Chowdhury C. Laser and its implications in dentistry: A review article. J Curr Med Res Opin. 2020;3:579. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jazaeri M, Torkzaban P, Afshar S, Najafi-Vosough R, Arany P, Gholami L. Comparison of pulsed and Continuous wave diode Laser at 940 nm on the viability and migration of gingival fibroblasts. Photochem Photobiol. 2023;99:1003–9. doi: 10.1111/php.13711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Al Habdan AH, Al Rabiah R, Al Busayes R. Shear bond strength of acid and laser conditioned enamel and dentine to composite resin restorations: An in vitro study. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021;7:331–7. doi: 10.1002/cre2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Donald CJ, Parker, Steven PA. Textbooks in Contemporary Dentistry. Springer Nature: Switzerland AG; 2023. Lasers in Dentistry Current Concepts. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ulmschneider C, Baker J, Vize I, Jiang J. Phonosurgery: A review of current methodologies. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;7:344–53. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.De Falco D, Di Venere D, Maiorano E. An overview of diode laser-assisted oral surgery. Cureus. 2020;12:e9297. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Besbes A, Elelmi Y, Khanfir F, Belgacem R, Ghedira H. Recurrent oral mucocele management with diode laser. Case Rep Dent. 2020;2020:ID8855759,1–5. doi: 10.1155/2020/8855759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Abbasi H, Beltrán Bernal LM, Hamidi A, Droneau A, Canbaz F, Guzman R, et al. Combined Nd: YAG and Er: YAG lasers for real-time closed-loop tissue-specific laser osteotomy. Biomed Opt Express. 2020;11:1790–807. doi: 10.1364/BOE.385862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Abraham RJ, Lankupalli AS. Laser management of intraoral soft tissue lesions-a review of literature. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2014;13:59–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Koppolu P, Mishra A, Kalakonda B, Swapna LM, Bagalkoikar A, Macha D. Fibroepithelial polyp excision with laser and scalpel: A comparative evaluation. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2014;3:1057–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Reddy MG, Eswar Rao VE, Chaitanya DJ, Kumar MG, Srikanthlkkurthi SS. Laser versus scalpel in intra oral surgical procedures: A clinical study research article. J Res Adv Dent. 2015;4:113–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ranjana BS, Sachanandani H, Surana P, Aliya S, Kudagi VS, Khanna S. Application of laser in dentistry: A brief review. J Adv Med Dent Sci Res. 2021 Nov 1;(9):62–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Raval N, Raju DR, Athota A, Reddy TY. Diode laser and white lesions: A clinical study on postoperative recovery, depth control and wound healing. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2011;23:S308–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Reddy Kundoor VK, Patimeedi A, Roohi S, Maloth KN, Kesidi S, Masabattula GK. Efficacy of diode laser for the management of potentially malignant disorders. J Lasers Med Sci. 2015;6:120–3. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2015.05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grzech-Leśniak K, Sculean A, Gašpirc B. Laser reduction of specific microorganisms in the periodontal pocket using Er: YAG and Nd: YAG lasers: A randomized controlled clinical study. Lasers Med Sci. 2018;33:1461–70. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2491-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sopi M, Koçani F, Bardhoshi M, Meqa K. Clinical and biochemical evaluation of the effect of diode laser treatment compared to the non-surgical and surgical treatment of periodontal diseases. Open Dent J. 2020;14:281–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Abu-Ta'a M, Karameh R. Laser and its application in periodontology: A review of literature. Open J Stomatol. 2022;12:305–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Georgieva V, Dzhongova E, Petrova I. Main advantages and drawbacks of different types of dental lasers in soft-tissue oral surgery. Scr Sci Med Dent. 2021;7:12–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Campos WG, Esteves CV, Gallo CD, Domaneschi C, Aranha AC, Lemos CA. Treatment of oral leukoplakia with CO 2 laser (10,600 nm): Analysis of 37 cases. Braz Oral Res. 2022:1–8. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dong Y, Chen Y, Tao Y, Hao Y, Jiang L, Dan H, et al. Malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia treated with carbon dioxide laser: A meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2019;34:209–21. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2674-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.de Pauli Paglioni M, Migliorati CA, Schausltz Pereira Faustino I, Linhares Almeida Mariz BA, Oliveira Corrêa Roza AL, Agustin Vargas P, et al. Laser excision of oral leukoplakia: Does it affect recurrence and malignant transformation?A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 2020;109:104850. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Monteiro L, Barbieri C, Warnakulasuriya S, Martins M, Salazar F, Pacheco JJ, et al. Type of surgical treatment and recurrence of oral leukoplakia: A retrospective clinical study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017;22:e520–6. doi: 10.4317/medoral.21645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Paschoal MA, Belém FV, Clementino LC, Martins-Júnior PA. Application of lasers in dentistry: A bibliometric study of the top 100 most-cited papers. Braz Oral Res. 2022;36:e104. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES