Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr;137(4):1389–1396. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.056317

Table II.

Interacting effect of cultivar and water treatment on ARA, plant ureides, and free amino acids in soybean leaf and nodule at harvest for Experiment 3

Cultivar
Water Treatmenta
Day of Treatment at Harvest
Relative ARA at Harvestb
Leaf
Nodule
Bulk Leaf Ureides Leaf-Disc Ureidesc Total Amino Acids Glu Ureides Total Amino Acids Asn Asp
μmol gdw−1
Jackson WD 4 0.11 13 12 91 13.6 64 95 28.8 16.9
WD fb RW 6 0.74 7 7 40 6.3 24 41 7.2 7.2
WW 6 1.01 6 7 41 6.3 34 37 7.6 5.6
KS4895 WD 4 0.15 16 23 77 5.8 61 80 23.6 13.0
WD fb RW 6 0.92 27 48 43 3.2 31 67 28.7 7.7
WW 6 1.01 13 18 42 3.9 24 35 2.5 4.6
LSD 0.05 0.24 2 9 18 2.4 11 17 11.2 3.2
a

WD, Water-deficit treatment harvested at FTSW of 0.08; WD fb RW, water deficit followed by rewatering harvested at FTSW = 0.6; WW, well watered harvested at FTSW = 0.6.

b

Relative ARA indicates ARA for the different soil-water treatments as a fraction of rate for the well-watered control.

c

Ureide concentration of uppermost fully expanded trifoliate as determined from leaf discs taken at harvest.