Table 3.
Univariate and multivariable logistic regression results for each placement scenario, Connecticut and New York, USA,2021.
| Support placement on own property | Support placement on other private land in neighborhood or community | Support placement on public land in neighborhood or community | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uORa | aORb | uOR | aOR | uOR | aOR | |
| State | ||||||
| CT | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference |
| NY | 0.72 (0.58 – 0.89) | 0.88 (0.69 – 1.13) | 0.81 (0.64 – 1.03) | 0.83 (0.63 – 1.10) | 1.24 (0.85 – 1.81) | 1.26 (0.81 – 1.96) |
| Sex | ||||||
| Female | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference |
| Male | 1.51 (1.23 – 1.86) | 1.54 (1.21 – 1.95) | 1.28 (1.01 – 1.61) | 1.48 (1.12 – 1.95) | 1.83 (1.22 – 2.81) | 2.79 (1.69 – 4.62) |
| Age, years | ||||||
| 18–49 | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference |
| ≥50 | 1.14 (0.92 – 1.41) | 1.17 (0.87 – 1.56) | 0.70 (0.55 – 0.89) | 0.80 (0.57 – 1.12) | 0.64 (0.42 – 0.97) | 0.78 (0.42 – 1.43) |
| Urbanicityc | ||||||
| Rural | reference | – | reference | – | reference | – |
| Suburban | 0.63 (0.48 – 0.83) | – | 0.72 (0.52 – 0.99) | – | 1.45 (0.92 – 2.28) | – |
| Urban | 0.80 (0.52 – 1.24) | – | 0.71 (0.43 – 1.16) | – | 1.31 (0.61 – 2.79) | – |
| Rent or own property | ||||||
| Own | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference |
| Rent | 1.77 (1.31 – 2.39) | 2.04 (1.40 – 2.95) | 1.44 (1.01 – 2.09) | 1.47 (0.95 – 2.27) | 0.88 (0.52 – 1.59) | 0.91 (0.48 – 1.72) |
| Property size | ||||||
| < 0.2 had | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference |
| 0.2 to < 0.4 ha | 1.52 (1.14 – 2.02) | 1.40 (1.04 – 1.90) | 1.34 (1.00 – 1.80) | 1.26 (0.91 – 1.74) | 1.11 (0.65 – 1.90) | 1.13 (0.62–2.07) |
| 0.4 to < 0.8 ha | 2.16 (1.52 – 3.06) | 1.76 (1.22 – 2.54) | 2.06 (1.36 – 3.12) | 1.81 (1.17 – 2.81) | 0.98 (0.51 – 1.90) | 0.80 (0.40 – 1.60) |
| ≥ 0.8 ha | 3.25 (2.32 – 4.56) | 2.72 (1.88 – 3.93) | 1.67 (1.14 – 2.44) | 1.64 (1.05 – 2.56) | 0.56 (0.33 – 0.97) | 0.54 (0.28 – 1.05) |
| No yard | 2.19 (1.32 – 3.62) | 1.79 (0.99 – 3.21) | 1.19 (0.69 – 2.07) | 1.17 (0.64 – 2.16) | 0.58 (0.26 – 1.32) | 0.57 (0.25 – 1.32) |
| Children (< 18 years) living in household | ||||||
| No | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference |
| Yes | 1.12 (0.89 – 1.41) | 0.93 (0.69 – 1.26) | 0.62 (0.47 – 0.80) | 1.39 (0.97 – 1.98) | 0.61 (0.37 – 0.95) | 1.25 (0.66 – 2.36) |
| Who should be responsible for tick controle | ||||||
| Private homeowners/property owners | 1.34 (1.08 – 1.65) | – | 1.29 (1.03 – 1.62) | – | 1.42 (0.99 – 2.05) | – |
| Homeowners/neighborhood associations | 1.30 (1.03 – 1.64) | – | 1.36 (1.04 – 1.77) | – | 1.32 (0.86 – 2.11) | – |
| Local government (city, township, county) | 1.23 (1.00 – 1.51) | – | 1.49 (1.18 – 1.89) | – | 1.80 (1.20 – 2.75) | – |
| State government | 1.49 (1.17 – 1.90) | – | 1.94 (1.45 – 2.64) | – | 2.00 (1.20 – 3.55) | – |
| None of these/Unsure | 1.45 (1.08 – 1.95) | – | 1.94 (1.46 – 2.58) | – | 2.12 (1.37 – 3.21) | – |
| Concerned that they or another household member will encounter ticks while spending time on their own property | ||||||
| Very/Extremely | 1.78 (1.24 – 2.59) | 1.92 (1.22 – 3.04) | 2.24 (1.56 – 3.20) | – | 1.44 (0.79 – 2.50) | – |
| Slightly/Somewhat | 0.98 (0.67 – 1.45) | 1.11 (0.70 – 1.76) | 1.18 (0.82 – 1.70) | – | 1.26 (0.68 – 2.25) | – |
| Not at all | reference | reference | reference | – | reference | – |
| Concerned that they or another household member will encounter ticks while spending time in their neighborhood or community | ||||||
| Very/Extremely | 2.13 (1.21 – 3.93) | – | 4.88 (2.89 – 8.31) | 4.88 (2.51 – 9.51) | 3.07 (1.46 – 5.98) | 2.63 (0.99 – 6.95) |
| Slightly/Somewhat | 1.28 (0.72 – 2.40) | – | 2.51 (1.48 – 4.30) | 2.47 (1.27 – 4.80) | 2.20 (1.03 – 4.36) | 1.70 (0.65 – 4.47) |
| Not at all | reference | – | reference | reference | reference | reference |
| Concerned that they or another household member will get a tickborne disease while spending time on their own property | ||||||
| Very/Extremely | 2.02 (1.41 – 2.94) | – | 2.61 (1.82 – 3.73) | – | 1.83 (1.05 – 3.08) | – |
| Slightly/Somewhat | 0.98 (0.67 – 1.45) | – | 1.20 (0.83 – 1.71) | – | 1.66 (0.94 – 2.86) | – |
| Not at all | reference | – | reference | – | reference | – |
| Concerned that they or another household member will get a tickborne disease while spending time in their neighborhood or community | ||||||
| Very/Extremely | 1.94 (1.15 – 3.37) | – | 3.96 (2.41 – 6.51) | – | 2.61 (1.24 – 5.04) | – |
| Slightly/Somewhat | 1.08 (0.63 – 1.90) | – | 2.17 (1.31 – 3.57) | – | 1.97 (0.93 – 3.86) | – |
| Not at all | reference | – | reference | – | reference | – |
| Ever diagnosed with a tickborne disease | ||||||
| No | reference | – | reference | – | reference | – |
| Yes | 0.81 (0.66 – 1.01) | – | 0.83 (0.65 – 1.05) | – | 1.27 (0.86 – 1.84) | – |
| Ever heard of 4-poster devices | ||||||
| No | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference | reference |
| Yes | 0.96 (0.65 – 1.44) | 1.03 (0.62 – 1.69) | 1.20 (0.78 – 1.81) | 1.12 (0.62 – 2.03) | 1.17 (0.56 – 2.20) | 0.63 (0.27 – 1.47) |
a
Unadjusted odds ratio.
b
Adjusted odds ratio.
c
Designations made by Marketing Systems Group.
d
Hectare.
e
Multiple options could be selected, so each outcome was evaluated individually. The reference group for each option was not having selected that option.