Table 4.
The increase in discounts due to a new indication price renegotiation
| Category | New indications discount increase (Δ discount)a | p value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Mean (%) | SD | Median (%) | ||
| Orphan | 13 | 12.8 | 0.089 | 15.7 | 0.475 |
| Not orphan | 39 | 13.1 | 0.127 | 10.5 | |
| Rare disease | 24 | 13.4 | 0.09 | 14.9 | 0.302 |
| Not rare disease | 28 | 12.7 | 0.139 | 8.0 | |
| Antineoplastic drugs (ATC: L01) | 32 | 14.5 | 0.103 | 14.9 | 0.030 |
| Other drugs | 20 | 10.6 | 0.135 | 5.1 | |
| MEA applied | 9 | 7.2 | 0.126 | 3.4 | 0.012 |
| MEA not applied | 43 | 14.2 | 0.113 | 14.4 | |
| Innovative | 19 | 14.6 | 0.092 | 14.0 | 0.179 |
| Not innovative | 33 | 12.1 | 0.129 | 8.0 | |
| With registry | 34 | 13.1 | 0.094 | 12.6 | 0.276 |
| Without registry | 18 | 12.7 | 0.154 | 3.3 | |
| Class A and A/PHTb | 12 | 10.3 | 0.095 | 8.7 | 0.416 |
| Class Hc | 40 | 13.8 | 0.123 | 12.8 | |
| Overall | 52 | 13.0 | 0.117 | 12.5 | – |
Bold p-values are significant
Italic values indicate the average value for all the sample (n = 52) (i.e. not clustered)
ATC Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system, MEA Managed Entry Agreements, P&R price and reimbursement
aΔ discount: difference between the discount in force before the new indication P&R and the discount in force after
bClass A: Medicines reimbursed in all settings; Class A/PHT: Medicines reimbursed in all settings but directly distributed by health authorities if used outside hospitals
cClass H: Medicines reimbursed only in the hospital setting