Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 16;8(2):251–261. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00467-2

Table 4.

The increase in discounts due to a new indication price renegotiation

Category New indications discount increase (Δ discount)a p value
N Mean (%) SD Median (%)
Orphan 13 12.8 0.089 15.7 0.475
Not orphan 39 13.1 0.127 10.5
Rare disease 24 13.4 0.09 14.9 0.302
Not rare disease 28 12.7 0.139 8.0
Antineoplastic drugs (ATC: L01) 32 14.5 0.103 14.9 0.030
Other drugs 20 10.6 0.135 5.1
MEA applied 9 7.2 0.126 3.4 0.012
MEA not applied 43 14.2 0.113 14.4
Innovative 19 14.6 0.092 14.0 0.179
Not innovative 33 12.1 0.129 8.0
With registry 34 13.1 0.094 12.6 0.276
Without registry 18 12.7 0.154 3.3
Class A and A/PHTb 12 10.3 0.095 8.7 0.416
Class Hc 40 13.8 0.123 12.8
Overall 52 13.0 0.117 12.5

Bold p-values are significant

Italic values indicate the average value for all the sample (n = 52) (i.e. not clustered)

ATC Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system, MEA Managed Entry Agreements, P&R price and reimbursement

aΔ discount: difference between the discount in force before the new indication P&R and the discount in force after

bClass A: Medicines reimbursed in all settings; Class A/PHT: Medicines reimbursed in all settings but directly distributed by health authorities if used outside hospitals

cClass H: Medicines reimbursed only in the hospital setting