Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 8;8(2):263–276. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00443-w

Table 4.

Disutilities of false-positive cancer screeninga,b

Health state N Mean disutility SD 95% CI
B1. False positive for lung cancer without head or neck involvement 203 − 0.041 0.061 − 0.049 to − 0.032
B2. False positive for lung cancer with possible head or neck involvement 203 − 0.101 0.137 − 0.120 to − 0.082
B3. False positive for lung cancer with a 6-month follow-up scan 203 − 0.111 0.141 − 0.130 to − 0.091
C. False positive for colorectal cancer 203 − 0.079 0.108 − 0.094 to − 0.064
D1. False positive for breast cancer; no biopsy or MRI 102 − 0.031 0.049 − 0.041 to − 0.021
D2. False positive for breast cancer; biopsy performed 102 − 0.058 0.079 − 0.073 to − 0.042
D3. False positive for breast cancer; MRI performed 102 − 0.067 0.083 − 0.083 to − 0.050
E1. False positive for pancreatic cancer; follow-up CT scan 203 − 0.048 0.072 − 0.058 to − 0.038
E2. False positive for pancreatic cancer; follow-up CT scan and PET-CT 203 − 0.088 0.115 − 0.104 to − 0.073

CI confidence interval, CT computed tomography, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, PET-CT positron emission tomography scan and computed tomography scan, SD standard deviation, TTO time trade-off

aTTO scores are on a scale anchored with 0 representing dead and 1 representing full health

bDisutilities (i.e., utility decreases) for each false-positive pathway were calculated by subtracting the mean utility of health state A (true negative screening result) from the utility of each health state with a false-positive screening result