Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 30;95(4):300–309. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.11.014

The Maternal Microbiome as a Map to Understanding the Impact of Prenatal Stress on Offspring Psychiatric Health

Mary C Kimmel 1, Branden Verosky 2, Helen J Chen 3, Olivia Davis 4, Tamar L Gur 5
PMCID: PMC10884954  NIHMSID: NIHMS1958240  PMID: 38042328

Abstract

Stress and psychiatric disorders have been independently associated with disruption of the maternal and offspring microbiome and with increased risk of the offspring developing psychiatric disorders, both in clinical studies and in preclinical studies. However, the role of the microbiome in mediating the effect of prenatal stress on offspring behavior is unclear. While preclinical studies have identified several key mechanisms, clinical studies focusing on mechanisms are limited. In this review, we discuss 3 specific mechanisms by which the microbiome could mediate the effects of prenatal stress: 1) altered production of short-chain fatty acids; 2) disruptions in TH17 (T helper 17) cell differentiation, leading to maternal and fetal immune activation; and 3) perturbation of intestinal and microbial tryptophan metabolism and serotonergic signaling. Finally, we review the existing clinical literature focusing on these mechanisms and highlight the need for additional mechanistic clinical research to better understand the role of the microbiome in the context of prenatal stress.


Pregnancy is a critical time during which insults can perturb fetal development and shape offspring long-term health outcomes (1,2). Specifically, maternal mental health during pregnancy is associated with alterations in offspring neurodevelopment (3). There is evidence that excessive perceived stress on top of genetic predisposition increases the risk for development of psychiatric disorders in the offspring (4-6). Proposed mechanisms by which maternal stress or psychiatric disorders can lead to disruptions in offspring behavior and mental health include epigenetic changes, disturbances of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, inflammation, and, most recently, alterations in the maternal microbiome (7-11).

The gut microbiome refers to the collection of microbes or microbiota that reside within the host intestinal tract as well as their functional output, including genetic elements and metabolites (12). The gut microbiome reflects aspects of an individual’s health and can be heavily influenced by diet and pregnancy status (13-15). The gut microbiome is essential for the host, as microbes metabolize complex carbohydrates for digestion, protect the host from pathogenic microbes, promote immune development, and provide essential vitamins and metabolites (16). Gut microbes communicate with the brain through factors such as host immune mediators and microbial metabolites, comprising the microbiota-gut-brain axis (17). The microbiota-gut-brain axis has been shown to be altered by psychiatric illness and chronic stress, including during pregnancy (8,18-24). Furthermore, changes to the maternal microbiome during pregnancy have lasting impacts on offspring neurodevelopment and behavior (25,26).

Clinical studies have demonstrated associations between psychosocial stress during pregnancy and changes to the maternal and offspring microbiome (27-35), with a focus on vertical transmission of perturbed microbial communities to the offspring as a primary mechanism of impacting neurodevelopment. However, there have been notable inconsistencies in specific microbiota that are impacted across the studies. Preclinical studies have explored additional mechanisms by which stress can alter the microbiota-gut-brain axis during pregnancy, including through microbial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) or tryptophan metabolites and through interactions with the immune system. The clinical studies examining these mechanistic underpinnings are limited.

Here, we first review the clinical studies on stress during pregnancy, the microbiota-gut-brain axis, and childhood psychiatric outcomes. We then review preclinical studies identifying potential mechanisms by which the microbiota-gut-brain axis can mediate impacts of maternal stress on offspring neurodevelopment. Finally, we highlight initial clinical work examining these mechanisms that supports the need to further delve into these mechanisms in clinical studies.

CURRENT CLINICAL RESEARCH ON STRESS DURING PREGNANCY, THE MICROBIOTA-GUT-BRAIN AXIS, AND CHILDHOOD BEHAVIORAL OUTCOMES: FOCUS ON VERTICAL TRANSMISSION OF MICROBES

Research on the impact of perceived stress during pregnancy on the maternal gut microbiome provided primarily associative rather than causal evidence. For example, a Dutch cohort found no association of measures of general stress and composition of the maternal gut microbiota during late pregnancy; however, several taxa at the genus level were found to contribute to a model predicting general anxiety during pregnancy (27). A study using two sociodemographically distinct cohorts in the United States investigated associations between perceived stress, measured by the Perceived Stress Scale, and the gut microbiota during the second and third trimesters (28). While alpha and beta diversity did not significantly differ based on levels of total maternal perceived stress, specific taxa were found to be associated with perceived stress. Dividing the Perceived Stress Scale into two factors (emotional distress and self-efficacy) showed that distress was associated with more pathogenic taxa, and self-efficacy was associated with more beneficial taxa. Bacteroides uniformis was positively associated with perceived stress and negatively associated with self-efficacy (28). B. uniformis has been hypothesized to be beneficial in some studies and pathogenic in others, with the presence of dietary fiber as a possible contributing factor (36,37). Self-efficacy was associated with increased alpha diversity during the first and second trimesters in another study (38). At the postpartum time point, perceived stress was negatively correlated with alpha diversity (38). Findings from nonpregnant individuals suggest that low alpha diversity of gut microbiota is correlated with markers of poor glucose tolerance and inflammation (39-41). Similarly, in pregnancy, decreased microbial diversity may be associated with these same markers of poor health, and, conversely, individuals with less perceived stress and greater microbial diversity could have healthier pregnancies.

Recent studies have also demonstrated correlations between maternal stress and the infant microbiome. This highlights one potential mechanism by which maternal stress impacts offspring health outcomes—through vertical transmission of maternal microbes to the infant. Microbes that persist in the neonatal gut in the first few months of life originate from the maternal gut (42). Increased pregnancy-related anxiety was associated with increased diversity in newborn meconium (29). One study demonstrated an association between maternal composite psychosocial stress scores and infant gut microbiome diversity: Infants of mothers with higher levels of stress assessed at delivery had higher alpha diversity at 6 months of age with lower levels of Lactobacillus gasseri and Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum (30). A similar study found that several beneficial microbial species of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus in the infant stool within the first year of life negatively correlated with maternal anxiety, depression, and stress scores during pregnancy (35). Psychological stress during midgestation and late gestation was associated with an increase in abundance of genera from the Proteobacteria phylum and a decrease in Akkermansia and Lactobacillus in the offspring during the first several months of life (33,34). However, another study demonstrated that maternal stress during the third trimester was positively associated with abundance of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium in infant stool samples collected at 1 month of age and negatively associated with infant Bacteroides and Enterobacteriaceae (31). Ruminococcus was less abundant in fecal samples collected at 2 years of age from children of women who had higher levels of self-reported anxiety during the second trimester of pregnancy (32).

Alterations in the maternal and neonatal gut microbiome have also been associated with adverse child behavioral outcomes. Alpha diversity of the maternal fecal microbiome during the third trimester of pregnancy was associated with child internalizing behaviors at 2 years of age, while maternal Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococceae were positively associated with normative behavior in children (43). Additionally, another large-scale study demonstrated that the maternal stool microbiome during the third trimester was more strongly associated with the child’s neurodevelopment at 1 year of age compared with the child’s stool microbiome at 3 to 6 months or 1 year of age (44). Higher maternal perceived stress, depression, or anxiety during the third trimester of pregnancy was associated with increased alpha diversity in the neonate after birth and at 1 month of age (35). Furthermore, meconium Lactobacillus was negatively associated with prosocial behavior and positively associated with hyperactivity at 2 years of age (45). Abundance of an Intestinibacter taxon at 2 years of age was negatively associated with internalizing problems at 4 years of age, while abundance of a Streptococcus taxon was negatively associated with developmental problems at 2 years of age (32). Prevotella in fecal samples at 12 months of age was associated with internalizing problems at 2 years (46), and Bifidobacterium and Streptococcus in stool collected from 2.5-month-old infants were associated with positive emotionality (34). Decreased Bacteroides and increased Veillonella, Dialister, and Clostridiales were associated with increased fear behavior at 1 year of age (47).

Altogether, though these clinical studies reveal associations between maternal stress, changes in the maternal and infant gut microbiome, and offspring behavior, the microbiota identified in these studies are inconsistent and vary widely among the cohorts. This suggests that vertical transmission is unlikely to be the sole mechanism underlying the relationship between maternal stress and offspring psychiatric and behavioral outcomes and indicates the need to investigate additional mechanisms identified in preclinical studies.

PRECLINICAL MODELS OF MATERNAL STRESS AND THE MICROBIOTA-GUT-BRAIN AXIS IN PREGNANCY: POTENTIAL MECHANISMS

Preclinical models have shown that stress during pregnancy leads to depressive- and anxiety-like behavior in pregnant dams. Chronic variable stress, restraint stress, and social isolation during pregnancy have been shown to induce depressive-like and anxiety-like behavior in pregnant rodents (48-51) that is reversible with antidepressant treatment (48-50). Prenatal stress has shown variable behavioral programming effects in the offspring due to the interactions between type of stress, sex, and gestational timing (52-57).

Preclinical models have implicated the microbiome in mediating offspring neurodevelopment. Studies using germ-free (GF) mice, which have developed in the absence of microbes, show that microbes directly impact multiple systems critical to neurodevelopment and stress response. GF mice have an elevated corticosterone response to restraint stress (58) and novel environment stress (59), increased blood-brain barrier permeability (60), increased prefrontal cortex myelination (61), increased hippocampal neurogenesis in adulthood (62), decreased BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) in the brain (58,59), and a male-specific increase in hippocampal serotonin (59). The microbial-dependent programming of the stress response and serotonin signaling occur during a critical period, as these changes cannot be rescued by colonization of microbes after weaning (58,59), although blood-brain barrier function can be recovered in GF mice after colonization in adulthood (60). Together, these preclinical studies identify how commensal microbes are important for neurodevelopment.

Other promising mechanisms beyond vertical transmission include altered production of microbial metabolites with a focus on SCFAs and tryptophan metabolism and interaction of the microbiome with the immune system. The microbiome plays a key role in training and development of various components of the immune system (63). Furthermore, there is evidence that stress impacts the immune system (64), and further that prenatal stress impacts the maternal and offspring immune system (8,65). Clinical studies have demonstrated that stress increases circulating proinflammatory cytokines in maternal circulation during pregnancy (19,66). While preclinical studies also demonstrate maternal inflammation with stress (67), some studies show decreased maternal inflammation with stress (68). Furthermore, studies in rodents have shown that prenatal stress induces inflammation in the placenta and fetal brain (52-55). Nonetheless, stress impacts the maternal and offspring immune system, with the maternal gut microbiome as a proposed intermediary.

These mechanisms are summarized in Figure 1, which shows that prenatal stress alters the maternal gut microbiome, leading to changes in SCFA production and tryptophan metabolism and modulation of the maternal immune system, specifically through TH17 (T helper 17) cell activation. These factors circulate through the maternal bloodstream and can impact placental tryptophan metabolism and immune function. These factors can alter fetal brain development through actions of SCFAs and indoles, a tryptophan metabolite, on microglia, the innate immune cell of the brain, and astrocytes as well as by direct actions on serotonergic neurons or cytotoxic effects of quinolinic acid through the NMDA receptor (NMDAR). These specific mechanisms are discussed in more detail in the following sections.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Summary of preclinical research depicting how prenatal stress may influence fetal neurodevelopment via maternal microbes, microbe-related metabolites, and immune factors. Prenatal stress has been linked to alterations in the maternal gut microbial community and causes placental and fetal brain inflammation and placental metabolism dysfunction through microbe- and CCL2-dependent mechanisms. In the maternal gut, microbes also drive TRP metabolism, produce SCFAs, and interact with the TH17 component of the host immune system. Microbial metabolites borne through maternal circulation further affect fetal neurodevelopment by directly interacting with AhRs, serotonergic neurons, and NMDA receptors in the developing brain; alternatively, SCFAs do so by diffusing directly into microglia. Postnatally, maternal gut microbes are directly transferred to the offspring, forming the basis of its own microbiome. 5-HT, serotonin; AhRs, aryl hydrocarbon receptors; EC, enterochromaffin; KA, kynurenic acid; KYN, kynurenine; QA, quinolinic acid; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids; TH, T helper; TRP, tryptophan.

Dietary Fiber and SCFA Production Are Important in Microglia Development

SCFAs have emerged as an important potential mechanism by which the microbiome mediates the impact of maternal stress on offspring neurodevelopment. The microbiome is responsible for the production of several bioactive metabolites, including SCFAs derived from microbial fermentation of dietary fibers. SCFAs mostly consist of acetate, propionate, and butyrate, which are readily transported into the circulation and brain parenchyma. Furthermore, SCFAs are absent in GF mice, indicating the importance of microbes in their production (69).

In the context of pregnancy, SCFAs can impact the brain both prenatally and postnatally, as maternal microbes produce SCFAs that can enter the maternal circulation and reach the fetal brain during pregnancy (70). Early pregnancy stress resulted in fewer early colonizers of the offspring microbiome with the ability to produce SCFAs (71). Chronic restraint stress in rodents decreases SCFAs in the stool (72), though social defeat stress increases stool SCFAs, specifically acetate (73). However, this study also showed that SCFA supplementation ameliorated social defeat stress–induced deficits in rewardseeking behavior, suggesting a potentially beneficial effect of SCFAs.

SCFAs can also affect the developing fetus through impacts on developing microglia. Microglia are the resident innate immune cells of the central nervous system, and evidence suggests that they have unique neuromodulatory functions in development and adulthood (74,75). Microglia help facilitate fetal brain development through regulation of neural precursor cells (76), modulation of cortical interneuron migration and wiring of inhibitory circuits (77,78), facilitating axonal guidance (77,79), regulating synapse formation (80,81), and supporting proper myelination (82). Microglia acquire the ability to respond to environmental signals during embryonic development, and the absence of maternal microbial metabolites perturbs their function and maturation (83). Male fetuses from GF dams have increased microglia density during the perinatal period (84) and into adulthood (85). While microglia do not express SCFA receptors, SCFAs can diffuse into microglia to regulate gene expression through inhibition of histone deacetylase activity (86). Supplementation of GF mice with SCFAs largely rescues the increased microglia proliferation and their perturbed morphology (85). Supplementing mice with acetate recapitulates this amelioration of microglia density and morphology in GF mice (87). Acetate supplementation is capable of restoring normal mitochondrial function and reversing most of the differentially expressed genes seen between microglia isolated from GF and conventionally colonized mice (87).

Commensal microbes are also necessary for microglia to mount an appropriate response to environmental signals. Mice born from GF dams fail to increase the expression of inflammatory cytokines in microglia that is seen in conventionally colonized mice after birth (84,88). Further, neonatal GF mice develop increased cerebellar synapses during the postnatal period with changes to microglial function, suggesting decreased microglial synaptic pruning (88). Similarly, GF microglia in adulthood have a blunted cytokine response to the bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (85). Acetate supplementation is capable of reversing most of the differentially expressed genes between microglia isolated from GF mice and conventionally colonized mice (87). Promoting SCFA production through increased dietary fiber also decreases the lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response in microglia (86). Together, these studies suggest that SCFAs could mediate the effect of maternal stress on offspring neurodevelopment by perturbing developing microglia.

Microbial Impacts on TH17 Are Key to Understanding the Balance Between Protection Against Pathogens and Tolerance of Commensal Bacteria

In addition to influencing microglial development, maternal microbial metabolites also play a key role in helping the maternal immune system tolerate the fetus and in regulating maternal intestinal and peripheral immune cells. Specifically, TH17 cells are a subset of T cells that produce the cytokine interleukin 17 (IL-17; also known as IL-17A) to induce inflammation and protect mucosa from pathogens (89,90). Furthermore, TH17 cells primarily reside in the terminal ileum mucosa and depend on intestinal macrophages and commensal microbes to induce their differentiation (91). Additionally, a careful balance of TH17 cells and a different subset of antiinflammatory T cells, regulatory T cells, is necessary for maternal immune tolerance of the fetus during pregnancy (92). As in vitro studies show that SCFAs such as butyrate induce T cells to become regulatory T cells rather than TH17 cells (93), alterations to the maternal microbiome and metabolites could impact the fetus through interacting with the maternal immune system.

Notably, animal models have shown that IL-17 is a factor in disrupted fetal brain development, though the majority of the data are derived from maternal immune activation (MIA) instead of prenatal stress models. MIA in mice with the viral mimetic poly(I:C) (polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid) increased IL-17A in the maternal serum (94). Furthermore, MIA induced abnormal patches of fetal brain cortical organization and perturbed offspring social behavior, which was reversed by blocking maternal IL-17A signaling or inhibiting differentiation of maternal TH17 cells (94). These cortical and behavioral effects were recapitulated with intraventricular injection of recombinant IL-17A into the fetal brain.

The differentiation of intestinal TH17 cells is largely dependent on segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB) (95). Mice of the C57BL/6 strain from The Jackson Laboratory (JAX) are devoid of SFB, resulting in minimal intestinal TH17 cells compared with mice from other vendors that have SFB. This deficiency in TH17 cells in JAX mice can be reversed with SFB colonization (95). Increased maternal IL-17A and fetal brain cortical disruptions and behavioral deficits are absent in JAX pregnant dams that undergo MIA. Additionally, colonizing these JAX mice with SFB before MIA recapitulates the fetal brain disruption (96). Adult JAX mice are mostly resistant to acquiring learned helplessness, but colonizing these mice with SFB leads to increased helplessness (97). These results suggest that gut colonization by SFB is necessary for TH17 cell–mediated effects in MIA offspring and in learned helplessness models of depression. However, it is also important to consider the impact of attenuating TH17 cell function on gut immunity, as JAX mice lacking SFB and TH17 cells are more susceptible to infection (95). In pregnancy, TH17 cells are increased in the decidua of the uterus, and this is thought to serve a role in protecting against pathogenic microbes, though excessive TH17 cells could contribute to inflammation for mother and fetus (98,99).

Further studies are needed to determine what SFB are beneficial versus pathogenic and when TH17 cell responses are required or excessive in the context of prenatal stress. Pregnancy is particularly challenging, as the immune system must be suppressed to allow fetal growth during the second trimester (100). Furthermore, the third trimester requires tight regulation, as increasing inflammation is required for delivery but excessive inflammation may result in obstetric complications such as preeclampsia (101).

Microbial Metabolism of Tryptophan and Serotonergic Signaling as Key Regulators

A third potential mechanism by which the maternal microbiome could mediate the effects of prenatal stress on neurodevelopment is through altered maternal intestinal metabolism of tryptophan, with downstream impacts on the developing offspring. Tryptophan comes from the maternal diet, and the majority (95%–99%) is metabolized along the kynurenine pathway, while only 1%–2% is shunted through the serotonin pathway (102). During stress, proinflammatory cytokines increase both IDO (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase) and TDO (tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase) (103-105), which catalyze tryptophan to kynurenine. Therefore, the small proportion of tryptophan that is metabolized along the serotonin pathway at baseline is further reduced by stress. Prenatally stressed mice also have microbes driving tryptophan metabolism (71). Maternal production of IL-17A also perturbs host tryptophan metabolism in the pregnant dam and in the offspring (106).

Within the kynurenine pathway, tryptophan is metabolized to kynurenine, which is then converted to either kynurenic acid or quinolinic acid (107). Quinolinic acid is a neuroactive agonist of glutamate NMDAR, and excessive activation of the NMDAR is neurotoxic (108). Quinolinic acid also inhibits the uptake of glutamate by astrocytes (108), which leads to underactivity of the prefrontal cortex, with diminished reward and cognitive impairment (109). When inflammation is fleeting, the system can be shunted back to production of kynurenic acid, which attenuates the agonist activity of the NMDAR and decreases glutamate levels (110,111).

In addition to intestinal metabolism of tryptophan, there is evidence that gut microbes alter tryptophan metabolism in the context of prenatal stress. Prenatal restraint stress reduced tryptophan-metabolizing taxa Parasutterella and Bifidobacterium in both the maternal colon and the postnatal offspring colon. Restraint stress also altered expression of genes related to tryptophan metabolism, tryptophan uptake from the intestinal tract, and tryptophan signaling in the pregnant dams (112). Prenatal restraint stress increased placental tryptophan and serotonin concentrations and was associated with placental and fetal brain inflammation. Microbes are critical to this relationship, as GF mice exposed to prenatal stress did not have increases in placental tryptophan or serotonin (52).

Altered tryptophan metabolism then plays a role in serotonergic signaling by increasing or decreasing peripheral serotonin production in the host and by altering serotonin availability (113). Other key considerations include the presence and level of activity of the bacterial β-glucuronidase enzyme in the intestine, which can alter the amount of free serotonin in the blood (114). Serotonin production and signaling are especially important in the context of stress and psychiatric disorders, as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are frequently prescribed to treat depression and anxiety disorders, including during pregnancy. One study showed that although administration of fluoxetine, an SSRI, during pregnancy did not alter the maternal gut microbiome in mice, pretreatment of the mice with antibiotics to deplete the microbiome modified the fetal brain transcriptional response to maternal fluoxetine treatment (115). Interestingly, in a model of pregnancy following early life stress, fluoxetine treatment modulated gut microbiome community structure and fecal amino acid concentrations during pregnancy and lactation in mice exposed to the stressor (116). Not only are SSRIs clinically relevant, but also their use in preclinical studies shows complex interactions between the maternal microbiome and offspring outcomes.

Microbes can also metabolize tryptophan into an indole, which can enter circulation and cross the blood-brain barrier (69). Indoles modulate immune function through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), a transcription factor expressed in several populations of immune cells, including microglia. AhR controls immune cell function through directly inhibiting nuclear factor-κB. Consequently, loss of AhR function in microglia impairs their ability to regulate activation of proinflammatory mediators and minimize damage to the central nervous system (117). Further, AhR signaling in astrocytes is important for attenuating central nervous system inflammation (117). Nontargeted metabolomic analysis comparing GF and specific pathogen–free dams has revealed distinct metabolomic profiles in the absence of microbes including lower indole and 3-indolepropionic acid in the fetal brain, fetal intestine, and the placenta (70). Together, these data suggest a critical interplay between stress, intestinal and microbial metabolism of tryptophan, and the immune system, which may shape offspring behavior.

CLINICAL MICROBIOME MECHANISTIC STUDIES AND CLINICAL TRIALS: VERY EARLY STAGES

While limited, there is some evidence from clinical studies of the mechanisms identified in preclinical studies. IL-17A has been associated with pregnant women in the third trimester who have severe depression and anxiety (118) as well as in children with autism spectrum disorder (119). A combination of cytokine and tryptophan markers in maternal serum during the second trimester predicted the development of depression during the third trimester (120). When the cytokine IL-6 was combined with quinolinic acid, kynurenine, and the kynurenine-to-tryptophan ratio from the second trimester, both severity of depressive symptoms and higher likelihood of major depression could be predicted (120). The chemokine CCL2 was associated with higher scores of anxiety symptoms in both the anxiety-alone group and the anxiety and comorbid depression group during the third trimester (121). Additionally, maternal fecal metabolites analyzed during the third trimester were associated with neurodevelopment in children at 1 year of age (44).

Some evidence can also be gleaned from research of commercially available probiotics, such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, though their use has yielded mixed results in studies to treat depressive symptoms and to improve mood (122-124). In a double-blind randomized pilot trial, pregnant women who were administered a probiotic containing species of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Lactococcus during the third trimester had no differences in depressive symptoms, anxiety, stress, and maternal bonding than women who were administered a placebo (125). While an in-depth analysis of probiotics is outside the scope of this review, it is worth noting that patients who received the probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum concomitantly with an SSRI had lower kynurenine concentrations and improved cognitive functioning compared with patients receiving a placebo with an SSRI (126). Furthermore, it is important to note that improving maternal mental health is a critical area of research independent of its impact on fetal programming. Figure 2 provides a theoretical model of the interplay of the mechanisms described in the context of prenatal stress and how they may mediate offspring neurodevelopment, with the aim of providing guidance for future clinical studies.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Theoretical illustration of microbial community composition, immune factors (particularly the TH17 arm of the immune system), and microbe-related metabolites that may be important components to the microbiota-gut-brain axis in the third trimester of pregnancy for further study and might differentiate individuals as follows: 1) an individual with low stress and no depression or anxiety with a diverse microbiome; 2) an individual with high stress that is buffered by a diverse microbial community and high fiber intake; and 3) an individual at a high risk of maternal depression and anxiety in the presence of elevated and chronic toxic stress, low microbial diversity, and low fiber intake. 5-HT, serotonin; CNS, central nervous system; KA, kynurenic acid; KYN, kynurenine; NMDAR, NMDA receptor; QA, quinolinic acid; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids; TH, T helper; TReg, T regulatory; TRP, tryptophan.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we have reviewed the current state of clinical research on maternal stress, the gut microbiome, and offspring behavioral outcomes. Furthermore, we have identified key mechanisms identified in preclinical studies that may explain how the microbiome may mediate the effects of maternal stress on offspring neurodevelopment, including 1) altered production of SCFAs, 2) interaction with TH17 cells, and 3) metabolism of tryptophan and serotonin signaling. Given the inconsistencies evident in the current literature in identifying specific microbes that are impacted by stress during pregnancy, future studies may benefit from focusing on mechanisms in addition to specific microbes. For example, future studies could investigate the effects of dietary fiber or SCFA supplementation in pregnant women exposed to psychological stressors on behavioral outcomes in their children. Additional metabolomic studies are also warranted to examine the impact of stress on tryptophan metabolites in the mother and child. Ultimately, this research is also necessary to help elucidate potential targets for intervention during pregnancy to prevent adverse outcomes in the children.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND DISCLOSURES

This work was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (Grant No. 1 K23 MH110660-01 [to MCK] and Grant No. 5R01MH129589 [to TLG, BV, and HJC]), Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (NARSAD Young Investigator Award [to MCK]), P&S Fund (to MCK), and National Institutes of Health (Grant No. T35-DK007386 [to OD]).

The authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

Contributor Information

Mary C. Kimmel, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Branden Verosky, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Helen J. Chen, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

Olivia Davis, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Tamar L. Gur, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gillman MW (2005): Developmental origins of health and disease. N Engl J Med 353:1848–1850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wadhwa P, Buss C, Entringer S, Swanson J (2009): Developmental origins of health and disease: Brief history of the approach and current focus on epigenetic mechanisms. Semin Reprod Med 27:358–368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.O’Connor TG, Heron J, Golding J, Glover V, ALSPAC Study Team (2003): Maternal antenatal anxiety and behavioural/emotional problems in children: A test of a programming hypothesis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 44:1025–1036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coleman JRI, Peyrot WJ, Purves KL, Davis KAS, Rayner C, Choi SW, et al. (2020): Genome-wide gene-environment analyses of major depressive disorder and reported lifetime traumatic experiences in UK Biobank. Mol Psychiatry 25:1430–1446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Colodro-Conde L, Couvy-Duchesne B, Zhu G, Coventry W, Byrne E, Gordon S, et al. (2018): A direct test of the diathesis-stress model for depression. Mol Psychiatry 23:1590–1596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang R, , Lifelines Cohort Study, Hartman CA, Snieder H (2023): Stress-related exposures amplify the effects of genetic susceptibility on depression and anxiety. Transl Psychiatry 13:27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Reynolds RM (2013): Glucocorticoid excess and the developmental origins of disease: Two decades of testing the hypothesis—2012 Curt Richter Award Winner. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38:1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hantsoo L, Kornfield S, Anguera MC, Epperson CN (2019): Inflammation: A proposed intermediary between maternal stress and offspring neuropsychiatric risk. Biol Psychiatry 85:97–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.O’Donnell K, O’Connor TG, Glover V (2009): Prenatal stress and neurodevelopment of the child: Focus on the HPA axis and role of the placenta. Dev Neurosci 31:285–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nugent BM, Bale TL (2015): The omniscient placenta: Metabolic and epigenetic regulation of fetal programming. Front Neuroendocrinol 39:28–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bronson SL, Bale TL (2015): The placenta as a mediator of stress effects on neurodevelopmental reprogramming. Neuropsychopharmacology 41:207–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Berg G, Rybakova D, Fischer D, Cernava T, Vergès MC, Charles T, et al. (2020): Microbiome definition re-visited: Old concepts and new challenges [published correction appears in Microbiome 2020;8:119]. Microbiome 8:103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Koren O, Goodrich JK, Cullender TC, Spor A, Laitinen K, Backhed HK, et al. (2012): Host remodeling of the gut microbiome and metabolic changes during pregnancy. Cell 150:470–480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rackers HS, Thomas S, Williamson K, Posey R, Kimmel MC (2018): Emerging literature in the microbiota-brain axis and perinatal mood and anxiety disorders. Psychoneuroendocrinology 95:86–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang H, Guo R, Li S, Liang F, Tian C, Zhao X, et al. (2020): Systematic analysis of gut microbiota in pregnant women and its correlations with individual heterogeneity. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 6:32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dominguez-Bello MG, Godoy-Vitorino F, Knight R, Blaser MJ (2019): Role of the microbiome in human development. Gut 68:1108–1114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cryan JF, O’Riordan KJ, Cowan CSM, Sandhu KV, Bastiaanssen TFS, Boehme M, et al. (2019): The microbiota-gut-brain axis. Physiol Rev 99:1877–2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.de Weerth C (2017): Do bacteria shape our development? Crosstalk between intestinal microbiota and HPA axis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 83:458–471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Coussons-Read ME, Okun ML, Nettles CD (2007): Psychosocial stress increases inflammatory markers and alters cytokine production across pregnancy. Brain Behav Immun 21:343–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Haeri S, Baker AM, Ruano R (2013): Do pregnant women with depression have a pro-inflammatory profile? Maternal depression and inflammation. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 39:948–952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hata T, Miyata N, Takakura S, Yoshihara K, Asano Y, Kimura-Todani T, et al. (2019): The gut microbiome derived from anorexia nervosa patients impairs weight gain and behavioral performance in female mice. Endocrinology 160:2441–2452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kelly JR, Borre Y, O’Brien C, Patterson E, El Aidy S, Deane J, et al. (2016): Transferring the blues: Depression-associated gut microbiota induces neurobehavioural changes in the rat. J Psychiatr Res 82:109–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nguyen TT, Kosciolek T, Maldonado Y, Daly RE, Martin AS, McDonald D, et al. (2019): Differences in gut microbiome composition between persons with chronic schizophrenia and healthy comparison subjects. Schizophr Res 204:23–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Osborne S, Biaggi A, Chua TE, Du Preez A, Hazelgrove K, Nikkheslat N, et al. (2018): Antenatal depression programs cortisol stress reactivity in offspring through increased maternal inflammation and cortisol in pregnancy: The Psychiatry Research and Motherhood–Depression (PRAM-D) Study. Psychoneuroendocrinology 98:211–221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Harshaw C, Kojima S, Wellman CL, Demas GE, Morrow AL, Taft DH, et al. (2022): Maternal antibiotics disrupt microbiome, behavior, and temperature regulation in unexposed infant mice. Dev Psychobiol 64: e22289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.O’Connor R, Moloney GM, Fulling C, O’Riordan KJ, Fitzgerald P, Bastiaanssen TFS, et al. (2021): Maternal antibiotic administration during a critical developmental window has enduring neurobehavioural effects in offspring mice. Behav Brain Res 404:113156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hechler C, Borewicz K, Beijers R, Saccenti E, Riksen-Walraven M, Smidt H, de Weerth C (2019): Association between psychosocial stress and fecal microbiota in pregnant women. Sci Rep 9:4463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Peñalver Bernabé B, Maki PM, Cunningham JL, Eisenlohr-Moul T, Tussing-Humphreys L, Carroll IM, et al. (2023): Interactions between perceived stress and microbial-host immune components: two demographically and geographically distinct pregnancy cohorts. Transl Psychiatry 13:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hu J, Ly J, Zhang W, Huang Y, Glover V, Peter I, et al. (2019): Microbiota of newborn meconium is associated with maternal anxiety experienced during pregnancy. Dev Psychobiol 61:640–649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dutton CL, Maisha FM, Quinn EB, Morales KL, Moore JM, Mulligan CJ (2023): Maternal psychosocial stress is associated with reduced diversity in the early infant gut microbiome. Microorganisms 11:975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Weiss SJ, Hamidi M (2023): Maternal stress during the third trimester of pregnancy and the neonatal microbiome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 36:2214835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Querdasi FR, Enders C, Karnani N, Broekman B, Yap Seng C, Gluckman PD, et al. (2023): Multigenerational adversity impacts on human gut microbiome composition and socioemotional functioning in early childhood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 120:e2213768120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zijlmans MA, Korpela K, Riksen-Walraven JM, de Vos WM, de Weerth C (2015): Maternal prenatal stress is associated with the infant intestinal microbiota. Psychoneuroendocrinology 53:233–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Aatsinki AK, Keskitalo A, Laitinen V, Munukka E, Uusitupa HM, Lahti L, et al. (2020): Maternal prenatal psychological distress and hair cortisol levels associate with infant fecal microbiota composition at 2.5 months of age. Psychoneuroendocrinology 119:104754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Galley JD, Mashburn-Warren L, Blalock LC, Lauber CL, Carroll JE, Ross KM, et al. (2023): Maternal anxiety, depression and stress affects offspring gut microbiome diversity and bifidobacterial abundances. Brain Behav Immun 107:253–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.López-Almela I, Romaní-Pérez M, Bullich-Vilarrubias C, Benítez-Páez A, Gómez Del Pulgar EM, Francés R, et al. (2021): Bacteroides uniformis combined with fiber amplifies metabolic and immune benefits in obese mice. Gut Microbes 13:1–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zafar H, Saier MH (2021): Gut Bacteroides species in health and disease. Gut Microbes 13:1848158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Long ES, Penalver Bernabe B, Xia K, Azcarate-Peril MA, Carroll IM, Rackers HS, et al. (2023): The microbiota-gut-brain axis and perceived stress in the perinatal period. Arch Womens Ment Health 26:227–234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kriss M, Hazleton KZ, Nusbacher NM, Martin CG, Lozupone CA (2018): Low diversity gut microbiota dysbiosis: Drivers, functional implications and recovery. Curr Opin Microbiol 44:34–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Le Chatelier E, Nielsen T, Qin J, Prifti E, Hildebrand F, Falony G, et al. (2013): Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature 500:541–546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Manor O, Dai CL, Kornilov SA, Smith B, Price ND, Lovejoy JC, et al. (2020): Health and disease markers correlate with gut microbiome composition across thousands of people. Nat Commun 11:5206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ferretti P, Pasolli E, Tett A, Asnicar F, Gorfer V, Fedi S, et al. (2018): Mother-to-infant microbial transmission from different body sites shapes the developing infant gut microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 24:133–145.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dawson SL, O’Hely M, Jacka FN, Ponsonby AL, Symeonides C, Loughman A, et al. (2021): Maternal prenatal gut microbiota composition predicts child behaviour. EBioMedicine 68:103400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sun Z, Lee-Sarwar K, Kelly RS, Lasky-Su JA, Litonjua AA, Weiss ST, Liu YY (2023): Revealing the importance of prenatal gut microbiome in offspring neurodevelopment in humans. EBioMedicine 90:104491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wei Q, Jiang Z, Shi H, Zou J, Lu W, Xiao X, Zhang Y (2022): Associations of maternal prenatal emotional symptoms with neurodevelopment of children and the neonatal meconium microbiota: A prospective cohort study. Psychoneuroendocrinology 142:105787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Loughman A, Ponsonby AL, O’Hely M, Symeonides C, Collier F, Tang MLK, et al. (2020): Gut microbiota composition during infancy and subsequent behavioural outcomes. EBioMedicine 52: 102640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Carlson AL, Xia K, Azcarate-Peril MA, Rosin SP, Fine JP, Mu W, et al. (2021): Infant gut microbiome composition is associated with non-social fear behavior in a pilot study. Nat Commun 12:3294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pawluski JL, Charlier TD, Fillet M, Houbart V, Crispin HT, Steinbusch HW, van den Hove DL (2012): Chronic fluoxetine treatment and maternal adversity differentially alter neurobehavioral outcomes in the rat dam. Behav Brain Res 228:159–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Salari AA, Fatehi-Gharehlar L, Motayagheni N, Homberg JR (2016): Fluoxetine normalizes the effects of prenatal maternal stress on depression- and anxiety-like behaviors in mouse dams and male offspring. Behav Brain Res 311:354–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Scarborough J, Mueller FS, Weber-Stadlbauer U, Mattei D, Opitz L, Cattaneo A, Richetto J (2021): A novel murine model to study the impact of maternal depression and antidepressant treatment on biobehavioral functions in the offspring. Mol Psychiatry 26:6756–6772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zoubovsky SP, Hoseus S, Tumukuntala S, Schulkin JO, Williams MT, Vorhees CV, Muglia LJ (2020): Chronic psychosocial stress during pregnancy affects maternal behavior and neuroendocrine function and modulates hypothalamic CRH and nuclear steroid receptor expression. Transl Psychiatry 10:6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chen HJ, Antonson AM, Rajasekera TA, Patterson JM, Bailey MT, Gur TL (2020): Prenatal stress causes intrauterine inflammation and serotonergic dysfunction, and long-term behavioral deficits through microbe- and CCL2-dependent mechanisms. Transl Psychiatry 10:191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gur TL, Shay L, Palkar AV, Fisher S, Varaljay VA, Dowd S, Bailey MT (2017): Prenatal stress affects placental cytokines and neurotrophins, commensal microbes, and anxiety-like behavior in adult female offspring. Brain Behav Immun 64:50–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gur TL, Palkar AV, Rajasekera T, Allen J, Niraula A, Godbout J, Bailey MT (2019): Prenatal stress disrupts social behavior, cortical neurobiology and commensal microbes in adult male offspring. Behav Brain Res 359:886–894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bronson SL, Bale TL (2014): Prenatal stress-induced increases in placental inflammation and offspring hyperactivity are male-specific and ameliorated by maternal antiinflammatory treatment. Endocrinology 155:2635–2646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mueller BR, Bale TL (2008): Sex-specific programming of offspring emotionality after stress early in pregnancy. J Neurosci 28:9055–9065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mueller BR, Bale TL (2007): Early prenatal stress impact on coping strategies and learning performance is sex dependent. Physiol Behav 91:55–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sudo N, Chida Y, Aiba Y, Sonoda J, Oyama N, Yu XN, et al. (2004): Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system for stress response in mice: Commensal microbiota and stress response. J Physiol 558:263–275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Clarke G, Grenham S, Scully P, Fitzgerald P, Moloney RD, Shanahan F, et al. (2013): The microbiome-gut-brain axis during early life regulates the hippocampal serotonergic system in a sex-dependent manner. Mol Psychiatry 18:666–673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Braniste V, Al-Asmakh M, Kowal C, Anuar F, Abbaspour A, Tóth M, et al. (2014): The gut microbiota influences blood-brain barrier permeability in mice. Sci Transl Med 6:263ra158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hoban AE, Stilling RM, Ryan FJ, Shanahan F, Dinan TG, Claesson MJ, et al. (2016): Regulation of prefrontal cortex myelination by the microbiota. Transl Psychiatry 6:e774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ogbonnaya ES, Clarke G, Shanahan F, Dinan TG, Cryan JF, O’Leary OF (2015): Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is regulated by the microbiome. Biol Psychiatry 78:e7–e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zheng D, Liwinski T, Elinav E (2020): Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease. Cell Res 30:492–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Okada S, Hori N, Kimoto K, Onozuka M, Sato S, Sasaguri K (2007): Effects of biting on elevation of blood pressure and other physiological responses to stress in rats: Biting may reduce allostatic load. Brain Res 1185:189–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ravi M, Bernabe B, Michopoulos V (2022): Stress-related mental health disorders and inflammation in pregnancy: The current landscape and the need for further investigation. Front Psychiatry 13: 868936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Coussons-Read ME, Okun ML, Schmitt MP, Giese S (2005): Prenatal stress alters cytokine levels in a manner that may endanger human pregnancy. Psychosom Med 67:625–631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Gumusoglu SB, Maurer SV, Stevens HE (2022): Dataset describing maternal prenatal restraint stress effects on immune factors in mice. Data Brief 43:108348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Antonson AM, Evans MV, Galley JD, Chen HJ, Rajasekera TA, Lammers SM, et al. (2020): Unique maternal immune and functional microbial profiles during prenatal stress. Sci Rep 10:20288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lai Y, Liu CW, Yang Y, Hsiao YC, Ru H, Lu K (2021): High-coverage metabolomics uncovers microbiota-driven biochemical landscape of interorgan transport and gut-brain communication in mice. Nat Commun 12:6000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Pessa-Morikawa T, Husso A, Kärkkäinen O, Koistinen V, Hanhineva K, Iivanainen A, Niku M (2022): Maternal microbiota-derived metabolic profile in fetal murine intestine, brain and placenta. BMC Microbiol 22:46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Jašarević E, Howard CD, Misic AM, Beiting DP, Bale TL (2017): Stress during pregnancy alters temporal and spatial dynamics of the maternal and offspring microbiome in a sex-specific manner. Sci Rep 7:44182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wu M, Tian T, Mao Q, Zou T, Zhou C, Xie J, Chen J (2020): Associations between disordered gut microbiota and changes of neurotransmitters and short-chain fatty acids in depressed mice. Transl Psychiatry 10:350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.van de Wouw M, Boehme M, Lyte JM, Wiley N, Strain C, O’Sullivan O, et al. (2018): Short-chain fatty acids: microbial metabolites that alleviate stress-induced brain–gut axis alterations. J Physiol 596:4923–4944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Borst K, Dumas AA, Prinz M (2021): Microglia: Immune and non-immune functions. Immunity 54:2194–2208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Lenz KM, Nelson LH (2018): Microglia and beyond: Innate immune cells as regulators of brain development and behavioral function. Front Immunol 9:698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Cunningham CL, Martinez-Cerdeno V, Noctor SC (2013): Microglia regulate the number of neural precursor cells in the developing cerebral cortex. J Neurosci 33:4216–4233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Squarzoni P, Oller G, Hoeffel G, Pont-Lezica L, Rostaing P, Low D, et al. (2014): Microglia modulate wiring of the embryonic forebrain. Cell Rep 8:1271–1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Thion MS, Mosser CA, Férézou I, Grisel P, Baptista S, Low D, et al. (2019): Biphasic impact of prenatal inflammation and macrophage depletion on the wiring of neocortical inhibitory circuits. Cell Rep 28:1119–1126.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Pont-Lezica L, Beumer W, Colasse S, Drexhage H, Versnel M, Bessis A (2014): Microglia shape corpus callosum axon tract fasciculation: Functional impact of prenatal inflammation. Eur J Neurosci 39:1551–1557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Schafer DP, Lehrman EK, Kautzman AG, Koyama R, Mardinly AR, Yamasaki R, et al. (2012): Microglia sculpt postnatal neural circuits in an activity and complement-dependent manner. Neuron 74:691–705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Weinhard L, di Bartolomei G, Bolasco G, Machado P, Schieber NL, Neniskyte U, et al. (2018): Microglia remodel synapses by presynaptic trogocytosis and spine head filopodia induction. Nat Commun 9:1228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.McNamara NB, Munro DAD, Bestard-Cuche N, Uyeda A, Bogie JFJ, Hoffmann A, et al. (2023): Microglia regulate central nervous system myelin growth and integrity. Nature 613:120–129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Thion MS, Low D, Silvin A, Chen J, Grisel P, Schulte-Schrepping J, et al. (2018): Microbiome influences prenatal and adult microglia in a sex-specific manner. Cell 172:500–516.e16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Castillo-Ruiz A, Mosley M, George AJ, Mussaji LF, Fullerton EF, Ruszkowski EM, et al. (2018): The microbiota influences cell death and microglial colonization in the perinatal mouse brain. Brain Behav Immun 67:218–229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Erny D, Hrabě de Angelis AL, Jaitin D, Wieghofer P, Staszewski O, David E, et al. (2015): Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nat Neurosci 18:965–977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Caetano-Silva ME, Rund L, Hutchinson NT, Woods JA, Steelman AJ, Johnson RW (2023): Inhibition of inflammatory microglia by dietary fiber and short-chain fatty acids. Sci Rep 13:2819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Erny D, Dokalis N, Mezö C, Castoldi A, Mossad O, Staszewski O, et al. (2021): Microbiota-derived acetate enables the metabolic fitness of the brain innate immune system during health and disease. Cell Metab 33:2260–2276.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Luck B, Engevik MA, Ganesh BP, Lackey EP, Lin T, Balderas M, et al. (2020): Bifidobacteria shape host neural circuits during postnatal development by promoting synapse formation and microglial function. Sci Rep 10:7737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Park H, Li Z, Yang XO, Chang SH, Nurieva R, Wang YH, et al. (2005): A distinct lineage of CD4 T cells regulates tissue inflammation by producing interleukin 17. Nat Immunol 6:1133–1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Khader SA, Gaffen SL, Kolls JK (2009): Th17 cells at the crossroads of innate and adaptive immunity against infectious diseases at the mucosa. Mucosal Immunol 2:403–411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Panea C, Farkas AM, Goto Y, Abdollahi-Roodsaz S, Lee C, Koscsó B, et al. (2015): Intestinal monocyte-derived macrophages control commensal-specific Th17 responses. Cell Rep 12: 1314–1324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Figueiredo AS, Schumacher A (2016): The T helper type 17/regulatory T cell paradigm in pregnancy. Immunology 148:13–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Asarat M, Apostolopoulos V, Vasiljevic T, Donkor O (2016): Short-chain fatty acids regulate cytokines and Th17/Treg cells in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro. Immunol Invest 45:205–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Choi GB, Yim YS, Wong H, Kim S, Kim H, Kim SV, et al. (2016): The maternal interleukin-17a pathway in mice promotes autism-like phenotypes in offspring. Science 351:933–939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ivanov II, Atarashi K, Manel N, Brodie EL, Shima T, Karaoz U, et al. (2009): Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria. Cell 139:485–498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kim S, Kim H, Yim YS, Ha S, Atarashi K, Tan TG, et al. (2017): Maternal gut bacteria promote neurodevelopmental abnormalities in mouse offspring. Nature 549:528–532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Medina-Rodriguez EM, Madorma D, O’Connor G, Mason BL, Han D, Deo SK, et al. (2020): Identification of a signaling mechanism by which the microbiome regulates Th17 cell-mediated depressive-like behaviors in mice. Am J Psychiatry 177:974–990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Wang W, Sung N, Gilman-Sachs A, Kwak-Kim J (2020): T helper (Th) cell profiles in pregnancy and recurrent pregnancy losses: Th1/Th2/Th9/Th17/Th22/Tfh cells. Front Immunol 11:2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Nakashima A, Ito M, Yoneda S, Shiozaki A, Hidaka T, Saito S (2010): Circulating and decidual Th17 cell levels in healthy pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol 63:104–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Mor G, Cardenas I, Abrahams V, Guller S (2011): Inflammation and pregnancy: The role of the immune system at the implantation site. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1221:80–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Lokki AI, Heikkinen-Eloranta JK, Laivuori H (2018): The immunogenetic conundrum of preeclampsia. Front Immunol 9:2630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Haq S, Grondin JA, Khan WI (2021): Tryptophan-derived serotoninkynurenine balance in immune activation and intestinal inflammation. FASEB J 35:e21888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Badawy AA (2013): Tryptophan: The key to boosting brain serotonin synthesis in depressive illness. J Psychopharmacol 27:878–893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Salter M, Pogson CI (1985): The role of tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase in the hormonal control of tryptophan metabolism in isolated rat liver cells. Effects of glucocorticoids and experimental diabetes. Biochem J 2:499–504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Knox WE (1951): Two mechanisms which increase in vivo the liver tryptophan peroxidase activity: Specific enzyme adaptation and stimulation of the pituitary- adrenal system. Br J Exp Pathol 32: 462–469. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Murakami Y, Imamura Y, Kasahara Y, Yoshida C, Momono Y, Fang K, et al. (2021): The effects of maternal interleukin-17A on social behavior, cognitive function, and depression-like behavior in mice with altered kynurenine metabolites. Int J Tryptophan Res 14: 117864692110266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Badawy AA (2017): Kynurenine pathway of tryptophan metabolism: Regulatory and functional aspects. Int Tryptophan Res 10: 117864691769193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Tavares RG, Tasca CI, Santos CE, Alves LB, Porciúncula LO, Emanuelli T, Souza DO (2002): Quinolinic acid stimulates synaptosomal glutamate release and inhibits glutamate uptake into astrocytes. Neurochem Int 40:621–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Bechtholt-Gompf AJ, Walther HV, Adams MA, Carlezon WA Jr, Öngür D, Cohen BM (2010): Blockade of astrocytic glutamate uptake in rats induces signs of anhedonia and impaired spatial memory. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:2049–2059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Kessler M, Terramani T, Lynch G, Baudry M (1989): A glycine site associated with N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors: Characterization and identification of a new class of antagonists. J Neurochem 52:1319–1328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Carpenedo R, Pittaluga A, Cozzi A, Attucci S, Galli A, Raiteri M, Moroni F (2001): Presynaptic kynurenate-sensitive receptors inhibit glutamate release: KYNA and glutamate release. Eur J Neurosci 13:2141–2147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Galley JD, Chen HJ, Antonson AM, Gur TL (2021): Prenatal stress-induced disruptions in microbial and host tryptophan metabolism and transport. Behav Brain Res 414:113471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Gheorghe CE, Martin JA, Manriquez FV, Dinan TG, Cryan JF, Clarke G (2019): Focus on the essentials: Tryptophan metabolism and the microbiome-gut-brain axis. Curr Opin Pharmacol 48:137–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Hata T, Asano Y, Yoshihara K, Kimura-Todani T, Miyata N, Zhang X-T, et al. (2017): Regulation of gut luminal serotonin by commensal microbiota in mice. PLoS One 12:e0180745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Vuong HE, Coley EJL, Kazantsev M, Cooke ME, Rendon TK, Paramo J, Hsiao EY (2021): Interactions between maternal fluoxetine exposure, the maternal gut microbiome and fetal neurodevelopment in mice. Behav Brain Res 410:113353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Ramsteijn AS, Jašarević E, Houwing DJ, Bale TL, Olivier JD (2020): Antidepressant treatment with fluoxetine during pregnancy and lactation modulates the gut microbiome and metabolome in a rat model relevant to depression. Gut Microbes 11:735–753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Rothhammer V, Borucki DM, Tjon EC, Takenaka MC, Chao CC, Ardura-Fabregat A, et al. (2018): Microglial control of astrocytes in response to microbial metabolites. Nature 557:724–728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Leff Gelman P, Mancilla-Herrera I, Flores-Ramos M, Saravia Takashima MF, Cruz Coronel FM, Cruz Fuentes C, et al. (2019): The cytokine profile of women with severe anxiety and depression during pregnancy. BMC Psychiatry 19:104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Suzuki K, Matsuzaki H, Iwata K, Kameno Y, Shimmura C, Kawai S, et al. (2011): Plasma cytokine profiles in subjects with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. PLoS One 6:e20470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Sha Q, Madaj Z, Keaton S, Escobar Galvis ML, Smart L, Krzyzanowski S, et al. (2022): Cytokines and tryptophan metabolites can predict depressive symptoms in pregnancy. Transl Psychiatry 12:35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Camacho-Arroyo I, Flores-Ramos M, Mancilla-Herrera I, Cruz FMC, Hernández-Ruiz J, Diaz GP, et al. (2021): Chemokine profile in women with moderate to severe anxiety and depression during pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21:807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Vaghef-Mehrabany E, Maleki V, Behrooz M, Ranjbar F, Ebrahimi-Mameghani M (2020): Can psychobiotics “mood” ify gut? An update systematic review of randomized controlled trials in healthy and clinical subjects, on anti-depressant effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics. Clin Nutr 39:1395–1410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Schaub AC, Schneider E, Vazquez-Castellanos JF, Schweinfurth N, Kettelhack C, Doll JPK, et al. (2022): Clinical, gut microbial and neural effects of a probiotic add-on therapy in depressed patients: a randomized controlled trial. Transl Psychiatry 12:227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Nadeem I, Rahman MZ, Ad-Dab’bagh Y, Akhtar M (2019): Effect of probiotic interventions on depressive symptoms: A narrative review evaluating systematic reviews. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 73:154–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Browne PD, Bolte AC, Besseling-van der Vaart I, Claassen E, de Weerth C (2021): Probiotics as a treatment for prenatal maternal anxiety and depression: A double-blind randomized pilot trial. Sci Rep 11:3051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Rudzki L, Ostrowska L, Pawlak D, Małus A, Pawlak K, Waszkiewicz N, Szulc A (2019): Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum 299v decreases kynurenine concentration and improves cognitive functions in patients with major depression: A double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study. Psychoneuroendocrinology 100:213–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES