Table 2.
Crude and adjusted analysis for drug and alcohol use as associated with transgender women sex workers compared to cisgender men who had not received money for sex and cisgender male sex workers.
| Used illicit drugsa |
Binge drinking episodeb |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | PR | 95% CI | aPRc | 95% CI | n (%) | PR | 95% CI | aPRc | 95% CI | |
| Transgender sex worker | 53 (43.8) | 2.5 | 1.9, 3.2 | 2.7 | 2.0, 3.5 | 49 (40.2) | 1.4 | 1.1, 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.2, 2.1 |
| Male sex workerd | 97 (34.3) | 1.9 | 1.5, 2.4 | 2.1 | 1.7, 2.8 | 113 (39.8) | 1.4 | 1.2, 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.3, 1.9 |
| Male non-sex workerd | 115 (17.8) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 182 (28.0) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | ||||
| Transgender sex worker | 53 (43.8) | 1.3 | 1.0, 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.9, 1.6 | 49 (40.2) | 1.0 | 0.8, 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.8, 1.3 |
| Male sex workerd | 97 (34.3) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 113 (39.8) | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | ||||
PR Prevalence ratio; aPR adjusted prevalence ratio; CI confidence intervals.
a
In the past 12 months.
b
In the past 7 days.
c
Adjusted for age, education and monthly income.
d
All cisgender men included in the study reported sex with a transgender woman or a man in the past 12 months.