Table 3.

FC, OSCE questionnaire results

Content	5	4	3	2	1
Q1: I understand the OSCE assessment model very well	30/64 (46.88%)	27/64 (42.19%)	7/64 (10.93%)	0	0
Q2: I believe that OSCE is beneficial to the overall competence of medical students in internship	36/64 (56.25%)	22/64 (34.38%)	6/64 (9.37%)	0	0
Q3: I believe that OSCE is a true reflection of the clinical competence of medical students	26/64 (40.63%)	29/64 (45.31%)	9/64 (14.06%)	0	0
Q4: OSCE is more innovative and objective than traditional exams	34/64 (53.13%)	25/64 (39.06%)	5/64 (7.81%)	0	0
Q5:I really like the way OSCE is evaluated	29/64 (45.31%)	26/64 (40.63%)	8/64 (12.50%)	0	1/64 (1.56%)
Q6: OSCE needs to be extended to the residency exam	26/64 (40.62%)	24/64 (37.50%)	11/64 (17.19%)	2/64 (3.13%)	1/64 (1.56%)
Q7: Through discussion and analysis in class, I have a deeper and more comprehensive grasp of knowledge	11/29 (37.93%)	17/29 (58.62%)	1/29 (3.45%)	0	0
Q8: Compared with TC, I think FC is more prominent in the improvement of students’ self-learning ability	10/29 (34.48%)	17/29 (58.62%)	2/29 (6.90%)	0	0
Q9: I would like our hospital to continue teaching in the FC model	10/29 (34.48%)	13/29 (44.83%)	5/29 (17.24%)	0	1/29 (3.45%)

FC: Flipped classroom; OSCE: Objective Structured Clinical Examination. Likert scores collected through a rating scale (5 = fully agree, 1 = fully disagree). Q1-Q6 are the contents of OSCE questionnaire, Q7-Q9 are the contents of FC questionnaire