Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 15;13(2):236. doi: 10.3390/antiox13020236

Table 4.

Meta-regression of the effects of the duration of tannin source supplementation on measured growth outcomes.

Variable a Model Results Heterogeneity b
95% CI TM Mixed Model Effects
Estimate SE p-Value Lower Upper QM τ2 τ I2 (%) R2
ADFI, g/day
GMTA −0.0113 0.0945 0.9048 −0.1965 0.1739 0.0143 2.8266 1.6813 96.63 0.00
ADG, g/day
Chestnut −3.2762 0.2604 <0.0001 −3.7866 −2.7659 158.2981 0.8039 0.8966 83.26 99.40
GMTA −1.6715 0.1233 <0.0001 −1.9132 −1.4299 183.7752 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
FBW, kg
Chestnut −1.6715 0.1233 <0.0001 −1.9132 −1.4299 183.7752 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
FCR
GMTA −0.2836 0.0767 0.0002 −0.4339 −0.1333 13.6825 1.7732 1.3316 91.34 69.89

a ADFI: average daily feed intake; ADG: average daily gain; FBW: final body weight; FCR: feed conversion ratio; GMTA: gallnut microencapsulated tannic acid. b SE: standard error; CI: confidence interval; TM: test of moderators; QM: model sum of squares; I2: Higgens statistics; τ2: heterogeneity variance of true effect size; τ: standard deviation of true effect size; R2: percentage of variation explained by the model.