Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 16;16(4):804. doi: 10.3390/cancers16040804

Table 5.

Distribution of risk scores and risk classification in a prediction score (HEARTS-Score) for arterial–esophageal fistula in the validation cohort.

Risk Score (6-Point Scoring System) Risk Classification
Total Points Patients
(n = 95) *
AEF Rate of AEF (%) Risk Category Patients AEF Rate of AEF, % (95% CI)
0 10 0 0.0 Low risk 46 2 4.3(0.5–14.8)
1 13 0 0.0
2 23 2 8.7
3 35 6 17.1 High risk 49 12 24.5(13.3–38.9)
4 11 5 45.5
5 2 1 50.0
6 1 0 0.0

AEF: arterial–esophageal fistula; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; HEARTS-score consists of hematemesis, active bleeding, renal function (serum creatinine level > 1.2 mg/dL), prothrombin time > 13 s, previous stent implantation; low risk is defined as a HEARTS-Score of 0–2 points, while high risk is defined as a HEARTS-Score of 3–6 points. * There were missing data in seven cases.