Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 16;16(4):804. doi: 10.3390/cancers16040804

Table 6.

Diagnostic ability of the HEARTS-Score in the derivation cohort and validation cohort.

Derivation Cohort Validation Cohort
C-Statistic (95% CI): 0.90 (0.82–0.98) C-Statistic (95% CI): 0.82 (0.72–0.92)
Low risk High risk Low risk High risk
Patients, n (%) 81(55.5) 65(44.5) Patients, n (%) 46(48.4) 49(51.6)
AEF, n (%) 1(1.2) 21(32.3) AEF, n (%) 2(4.3) 12(24.5)
Sensitivity, % 4.5 95.5 Sensitivity, % 14.3 85.7
Specificity, % 35.5 64.5 Specificity, % 45.7 54.3
PPV, % 1.2 32.3 PPV, % 4.3 24.5
NPV, % 67.7 98.8 NPV, % 75.5 95.7
Weighted accuracy, % 20.0 80.0 Weighted accuracy, % 30.0 70.0

AEF: arterial–esophageal fistula; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; HEARTS-Score consists of hematemesis, active bleeding, renal function (serum creatinine level > 1.2 mg/dL), prothrombin time > 13 s, previous stent implantation; low risk is defined as a HEARTS-Score of 0–2 points, while high risk is defined as a HEARTS-Score of 3–6 points.