Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 8;16(4):724. doi: 10.3390/cancers16040724

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of 198 patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy and enteral stenting.

Variables Overall
n = 198
EUS-GE
n = 66
ES
n = 132
p Value °
Age (years), mean ± SD 67.2 ± 11.4 69.6 ± 11.4 66 ± 11.9 0.045
Sex
Male
Female

96 (48.5%)
102 (51.5%)

38 (57.6%)
28 (42.4%)

68 (51.5%)
64 (48.5%)

0.420
PS-ECOG
0–1
2
3–4

91 (46.0%)
64 (32.3%)
43 (21.7%)

41 (62.1%)
16 (24.2%)
9 (13.7%)

50 (37.9%)
48 (36.4%)
34 (25.7%)


0.005
Pre-procedural GOOSS *
0
1
Mean value ± SD

132 (66.7%)
66 (27.7%)
0.38 ± 0.59

31 (47.0%)
35 (50.0%)
0.56 ± 0.55

101 (76.5%)
31 (16.7%)
0.25 ± 0.5


<0.0001
Type of malignancy
Pancreatic
Other #

139 (70.2%)
59 (29.8%)

38 (57.6%)
28 (42.4%)

101 (76.5%)
31 (23.4%)

0.01
Stage of disease
Resectable/locally advanced
Metastatic

100 (50.5%)
98 (49.5%)

32 (48.5%)
34 (51.5%)

68 (51.5%)
64 (48.5%)

0.373
Ascites
Yes
No

34 (17.2%)
164 (82.8%)

2 (3.0%)
64 (97.0%)

32 (24.2%)
100 (75.8%)

<0.001
Biliary obstruction
Yes
No

128 (64.6%)
70 (35.4%)

32 (48.5%)
34 (51.5%)

96 (72.7%)
36 (27.3%)

<0.001
Stenosis location **
Type I
Type II
Type III

70 (35.4%)
82 (41.4%)
46 (23.2%)

20 (30.3%)
26 (39.4%)
20 (30.3%)

50 (37.9%)
56 (42.4%)
26 (19.7%)


0.229
Follow-up duration, median (IQR), days 90.5 (37–247) 91.5 (42–189) 92 (34–252) 0.894

EUS-GE: endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy; ES: enteral stenting; SD: standard deviation; PS-ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; GOOSS: gastric outlet obstruction score system. ° ES vs. EUS-GE. * According to Adler and Baron [23]; # Other includes duodenal (18, 9%), biliary (14, 7.1%), gastric (13, 6.6%), papillary (7, 3.5%), metastases (5, 2.6%), retroperitoneal tumors (2, 1.0%). ** According to the Mutignani classification [26].