Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 8;16(4):724. doi: 10.3390/cancers16040724

Table 6.

Baseline features of the population of patients after propensity score-matching (n = 90) who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (n = 45) or enteral stenting (n = 45).

Variables EUS-GE
n = 45
ES
n = 45
p Value °
Age (years), mean ± SD 68.9 ± 11.5 70.0 ± 10.0 0.523
Sex
Male
Female

18 (40.0%)
27 (60.0%)

21 (46.7%)
24 (53.3%)

0.670
PS-ECOG
0–1
2
3–4

25 (55.6%)
13 (28.9%)
7 (15.6%)

23 (51.1%)
19 (42.2%)
3 (6.7%)

0.281
Charlson Comorbidity Index
≤7
>7

27 (60.0%)
18 (40.0%)

30 (66.7%)
15 (33.3%)

0.662
Pre-procedural GOOSS *
0
1


18 (40.0%)
27 (60.0%)


25 (55.6%)
20 (44.4%)


0.205
Type of malignancy
Pancreatic
Other

30 (66.7%)
15 (33.3%)

37 (82.2%)
8 (17.8%)

0.147
Stage of disease
Resectable/locally advanced
Metastatic

22 (48.9%)
23 (51.1%)

24 (53.3%)
21 (46.7%)

0.123
Ascites
No
Yes

42 (93.3%)
3 (6.7%)

44 (97.8%)
1 (2.2%)

0.616
Biliary obstruction
No
Yes

19 (42.2%)
26 (57.8)

22 (48.9%)
23 (51.1%)

0.672
Stenosis location **
Type I
Type II
Type III

12 (26.7%)
19 (42.2%)
14 (31.1%)

13 (28.9%)
20 (44.4%)
12 (26.7%)

0.935
Follow-up duration, median (IQR), days 80 (52–174) 99 (41.5–192) 0.316

EUS-GE: endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy; ES: enteral stenting; SD: standard deviation; PS-ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; GOOSS: gastric outlet obstruction score system. ° ES vs. EUS-GE. * According to Adler and Baron [23]; ** According to the Mutignani classification [26].