Table 1.
Authors, Ref. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Was There a Clear Question for the Study to Address? | Was There a Comparison with an Appropriate Reference Standard? | Did All Patients Get the Diagnostic Test and Reference Standard? | Could the Results of the Test Have Been Influenced by the Results of the Reference Standard? | Is the Disease Status of the Tested Population Clearly Described? | Were the Methods for Performing the Test Described in Sufficient Detail? | What Are the Results? | How Sure Are We about the Results? Consequences and Cost of Alternatives Performed? | Can the Results be Applied to Your Patients/the Population of Interest? |
Can the Test be Applied to Your Patient or Population of Interest? | Were All Outcomes Important to the Individual or Population Considered? | What Would be the Impact of Using This Test on Your Patients/Population? | |
Fu et al. [34] | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☹ | ☺ | ☺ | Sensitivity and specificity | Data are clear | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | More experience is needed |
Mu et al. [35] | ☺ | ☹ | ? | ? | ? | ☺ | Detection rate | Not clear | ? | ? | ? | No information about the standard of reference |
Sayiner et al. [36] | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☹ | ☺ | ☺ | Detection rate | Not clear | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | Limited data in small population |
Chen et al. [37] | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☹ | ☺ | ☺ | Descriptive analysis | Not clear | ? | ? | ? | Limited data |
Ballal et al. [38] | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☹ | ☺ | ☺ | Detection rate and semiquantitative data | Not clear | ☺ | ☺ | ? | The effect on the management is unclear |
Ballal et al. [52] | ☺ | ☺ | ☺ | ☹ | ☺ | ☺ | Detection rate and semiquantitative data | Not clear | ? | ? | ? | Limited data |
☺ Yes; ? Cannot tell; and ☹ No.