Abstract
This is the first reported case series of nasally delivered beta blocker (timolol 0.5%) for the treatment of acute migraine. In a retrospective chart review, 16 patients were found who had received intranasal timolol for sub-optimally treated acute migraines. Of these, 10 (62.5%) reported to their provider that the medication was helpful. Encouragingly, the treatment was beneficial even for patients previously refractory to other medications. Intranasal timolol was well tolerated, with only one patient reporting mild nasal congestion and no other side effects reported. These findings suggest the need for a prospective pilot study followed by a larger double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial to determine the overall efficacy and safety of nasally delivered beta blockers for acute migraine treatment.
Introduction
Oral beta blockers, taken daily, have been proven useful in migraine prevention; propranolol and timolol are FDA approved for this indication.1 Episodic oral beta blocker treatment of acute migraine has not been successful. It is hypothesized that the difference in responsiveness is the prolonged time to achieve therapeutic beta blocker blood levels by oral administration at first onset of acute migraine.2
In 2014, Migliazzo and Hagan3 reported the first case series of successful treatment of acute migraine using topical 0.5% timolol eye drops. Findings were validated in subsequent placebo-controlled studies.4,5 A single study purported to show that topical timolol eye drops were not effective for acute migraine treatment.6 This study was later challenged as having flaws in trial design and implementation.7
Therapeutic application of timolol eye drops for acute migraine requires a dexterous patient with functional eyelids and patent lacrimal duct drainage onto normal nasal mucosa. Additionally, the patient must first be examined by an ophthalmologist and found to have no ocular contraindication.3 Nasal spray delivery of beta blockers has been postulated to be easier, more effective and more suitable for migraine patients than topical drops to the eye.8
This retrospective chart review outlines the clinical experience with the use of nasally delivered 0.5% timolol solution in 16 patients. A single representative case report is presented.
Case Report
A 39-year-old female initially presented to the author’s (SCK) headache clinic after a fall causing head injury that substantially worsened her baseline migraines. She presented with status migrainosus which was successfully treated with occipital and trigeminal branch nerve blocks and changes to her preventive medication regimen. She was a poor responder to triptan medication and was overusing over-the-counter (OTC) analgesic medications. Due to poor insurance coverage and excessive patient co-pay, she had difficulty getting access to newer CGRP blocking medications. Timolol 0.5% nasal spray was prescribed for acute migraine treatment. She reported this to be quite helpful in aborting migraine attacks that broke through her preventive medications. Over time, she has used nasal timolol spray for multiple migraines with recurring success. She continues to use timolol nasal spray as a first line acute treatment option. She has reported no side effects. The preventive medication adjustments, along with this novel acute treatment option, led to cessation of her overuse of OTC analgesics. She reports a notable improvement in her personal and professional life.
Methods
The referral headache neurology practice of one of the authors (SCK) has previously worked with a compounding pharmacy to be able to prescribe nasal timolol to patients not satisfied with their current acute treatment regimen. The compounding pharmacy, O’Brien Pharmacy, produces a solution of 0.5% timolol combined with Mucolox™ to enhance nasal absorption which is given in a nasal aerosol delivery device (Figure 1). Each metered 0.1 ml spray delivers 0.5 mgs timolol to the nasal mucosa. When prescribed, patients are advised to use one spray in each nostril as quickly as possible at the onset of an acute migraine. If necessary, they are told they can use a second set of nasal sprays 15 minutes later. No more than four sprays are allowed within a 24-hour period. Because this treatment is novel and they report dissatisfaction with their previous abortive options, patients have been asked to use timolol solely as their rescue medication. Also because of the novelty of treatment, patients have been routinely asked in their follow-up clinical visits whether they felt the treatment was effective and whether they had any side effects. Patients are not offered timolol nasal spray if they are already on a beta blocker or if they had contraindications to the medication.
Figure 1.

Sample nasal timolol 0.5% prescription (figure used with permission from Tyler Chamberlain, PharmD).
The charts of all patients who received nasal timolol from May 2022 to August 2023 were reviewed. Based on their headache history, the first author (SCK) assigned patients an “intractability score” (Figure 2) to delineate how refractory their migraine headaches were to previous treatments. This score ranged from one to five with five being the most refractory migraines. The score factored in the number of migraine days per month (episodic – less than 15 headache days per month or chronic – greater than 15 headache days per month) and medication response history (acute and preventive therapies).
Figure 2.
Migraine Intractability Score
Results
Thirty acute migraine prescriptions for nasal spray timolol 0.5% were generated from May 2022 to August 2023. Of these, 16 patients ultimately filled the prescription. Reasons for not filling the prescription included: lack of insurance coverage for compounded prescriptions, lack of familiarity with compounding pharmacies, or intolerance of nasal spray medications. Out of pocket-cost was an uncommon reason for not filling. Notably, the pharmacy price for a single, 15 ml compounded 0.5% timolol nasal spray is $77.45 and $112.03 for 30 ml (January 2024).
Of the 16 patients that filled and tried the prescription, 10 reported a favorable response (62.5%) and added the new therapy as an ongoing supplementary acute migraine treatment option. Six patients (37.5%) reported they did not perceive any favorable response (Table 1). Only one patient reported side effects of the medication, and this was mild nasal congestion. Notably, this patient also reported a positive response and chose to continue the medication. In the patients who responded favorably, the intractability score ranged from 2 to 5 with an average of 3.4. The score in those who did not respond ranged from 3 to 5 with an average of 3.8.
Table 1.
Abbreviations: CM-chronic migraine; EM-episodic migraine; w/-with; w/o-without; F-female; M-male
| Positive response to timolol | No response to timolol | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, age | Diagnosis | Intractability Score | Sex, age | Diagnosis | Intractability Score |
| F, 39 | CM w/o aura | 4 | F, 38 | CM w/o aura | 3 |
| M, 53 | CM w/aura | 5 | M, 66 | CM w/o aura | 5 |
| F, 51 | CM w/o aura | 3 | M, 67 | CM w/o aura | 3 |
| M, 45 | EM w/ aura | 2 | F, 42 | CM w/aura | 4 |
| F, 65 | CM w/o aura | 5 | F, 43 | CM w/aura | 5 |
| F, 39 | CM w/aura | 4 | F, 54 | CM w/o aura | 3 |
| F, 26 | CM w/o aura | 3 | |||
| F,42 | CM w/o aura | 4 | |||
| F, 32 | CM w/o aura | 4 | |||
| M, 54 | CM w/ aura | 5 | |||
Discussion
Oral beta blockers are an established preventative therapy for migraine, but these require daily dosing to achieve and maintain therapeutic blood levels. Previous studies examining oral beta blockade as an acute treatment for migraine were unsuccessful,9 likely because the extensive first pass metabolism prevented rapid achievement of the therapeutic level. Beta blockers, in solution form, applied to normal nasal mucosa achieve blood levels comparable to intravenous injection.10 The previously reported effectiveness of timolol applied topically to the eye for abortive migraine treatment has been proposed to be due to drainage of the beta blocker through the lacrimal system onto the nasal mucosa.3
In this small retrospective series, 10/16 (62.5%) of patients reported improvement in migraine after trying timolol 0.5% by nasal spray at the onset of their migraine. It is not clear how many times each patient tried the medication or how much improvement was achieved, but these 10 patients did choose to continue with the medication long term. Encouragingly, this series included patients that were previously refractory to other treatments. The nasal application of timolol was well tolerated, and negated contraindications for topical eye medication, such as eyelid ectropion or lacrimal system dysfunction. While this series demonstrates the promise of another option for abortive migraine treatment, additional larger randomized placebo-controlled trials are required.
Conclusion
Despite the growing number of treatment options, there continue to be migraine patients with no response to the current available medications. As science continues to explore new drug targets through translational research, it is also reasonable to revisit older generation medications while exploring novel delivery systems. In the period since the 2014 Migliazzo-Hagan case series,3 there has been growing interest in the therapeutic promise of rapidly absorbed beta blockers.11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19 This study adds to the growing body of literature supporting topical timolol as an option for acute migraine treatment.
Footnotes
Steven C. Kosa, MD, (pictured) is a neurologist with interest in headache treatment. John C. Hagan, III, MD, is an ophthalmologist and editor of Missouri Medicine. Both practice in North Kansas City, Missouri.
The compounded, prescription only, nasal timolol spray is available from O’Brien’s Pharmacy, 913-322-0001, 800-627-4360, 913-322-0002 (fax), mail@obrienrx.com; website: https://obrienrx.com.
Disclosure: Financial Disclosures: None. Artificial intelligence was not used in the study, research, preparation, or writing of this manuscript. The authors wish to thank Tyler Chamberlain, PharmD for his assistance.
References
- 1.Modi S, Lowder DM. Medications for Migraine Prevention Am Fam Physician. 2006;73(1):72–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Banerjee M, Findley L. Propranolol in the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Cephalalgia. 1991;11(4):193–196. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1991.1104193.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Migliazzo CV, Hagan JC., III Beta Blocker Eye Drops for the Treatment of Acute Migraines Missouri Medicine. 2014;111(4):284–289. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cossack M, Nabrinsky E, Turner H, Abraham A, Gratton S. Timolol Eyedrops in the Treatment of Acute Migraine Attacks: A Randomized Crossover Study. JAMA Neurol. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0970. Published online May 14, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kurian A, Reghunadhan I, Thilak P, Soman A, Nair U. Short-term Efficacy and Safety of Topical β-Blockers (Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.5%) in Acute Migrane: A Randomized Crossover Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138(11):1160–1166. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.3676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Aggarwal D, Heim AJ, Bittel B, et al. A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo Controlled, Cross Over Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safter of Timolol Ophthalmic Solution as an Acute Treatment of Migraine. Kansas Journal of Medicine. 2020;13(supplement 2):2–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hagan JCIII. Letter to the Editor: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Cross Over Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Timolol Ophthalmic Solution as an Acute Treatment of Migraine. Kansas Journal of Medicine. 2020;13 KJM Supplement 2: Frontiers Edition. https://journals.ku.edu/kjm/article/view/15733 . [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hagan JC, III, Everett E, Chamberlain T. Compounded Beta-blocker Nasal Spray for Treatment of Acute Migraine: A New Therapeutic Modality. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Compounding. 2020;24:194–197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fuller GN, Guiloff RJ. Propranolol in Acute Migraine Cephalalgia. 1990;10(5):229–233. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1990.1005229.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Duchateau GS, Zuidema J, Merkus FW. Bioavailability of Propranolol After Oral, Sublingual, and Intranasal Administration. Pharm Res. 1986;3:108–111. doi: 10.1023/A:1016345504153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.French BR, Singh NN. Beta Blocking Eye Drops in Acute Migraine: A Novel Use of an Old Drug. Missouri Medicine. 2014;111(4):289–291. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dexter JK, Cady RK. Ophthalmic Beta Blockers: Treatment for Acute Migraines? Missouri Medicine. 2014;111(4):292–293. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chung SM. Can Topical Beta Blockers be Successful for Acute Migraine Management? Missouri Medicine. 2014;111(4):294–296. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gratton SM, Cossack M. Answering the Call: A Prospective Look at the Role of Timolol Eye Drops in the Treatment of Acute Migraine Attacks. Missouri Medicine. 2018;115(6):520–521. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Katz BJ. Put a Drop of Timolol into Each Eye and Call Me in the Morning. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2020;138(11):1166–1167. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.3837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hagan JCIII. It Should Not Be This Difficult to Engage Pharma in an Effective, Safe, Inexpensive Product for Acute Migraine, the Third Most Prevalent Disease in the World”. Missouri Medicine. 2022;119(1):4–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hagan JCIII. Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Acute Treatments for Episodic Migraine in Adults”. JAMA. 2021;326(16):1636. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.14060. https://doi:10.1001/jama.2021.14060 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chiam PJT. Topical beta-blocker treatment for migraine. Int Ophthalmol. 2012;32:85–88. doi: 10.1007/s10792-012-9516-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Migliazzo CV, Hagan JC., III Topical Beta Blockers for the Treatment of Acute Migraines in 2019. Missouri Medicine. 2018;115(6):508–509. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



