Table A2.
The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies.
The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | Castelo et al. 2005 [26] | Knosel et al. 2012 [16] | González et al. 2020 [25] | Noor et al. 2021 [23] | Rodriguez-Olivos et al. 2022 [24] |
1. Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
2. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
3. Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes |
4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? | No | No | Yes | Unclear | Yes |
5. Were confounding factors identified? | No | No | No | No | No |
6. Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? | No | No | No | No | No |
7. Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes |
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis used? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Overall appraisal: | Include (Seek further info) |
Include (Seek further info) |
Include (Seek further info) |
Include (Seek further info) |
Include (Seek further info) |