Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 7;25(4):2014. doi: 10.3390/ijms25042014

Table 3.

Relationships between the concentrations of IGF proteins in ascites and the circulation of patients with ovarian cancer.

IGF-1 IGF-2 IGF Bioactivity IGFBP-4 CT-IGFBP-4 NT-IGFBP-4 PAPP-A PAPP-A2 STC1 STC2
IGF-1 r 0.297 0.558 −0.493 −0.544 −0.376 0.210
p 0.002 0.000 0.027 0.001 0.000 0.021
IGF-2 r 0.627 0.248
p 0.000 0.006
IGF bioactivity r 0.437 0.554
p 0.008 0.001
IGFBP-4 r
p
CT-IGFBP-4 r 0.319 0.500 0.485 0.686 0.745
p 0.048 0.041 0.048 0.001 0.001
NT-IGFBP-4 r 0.330 0.506 0.606 0.668
p 0.045 0.040 0.010 0.001
PAPP-A r 0.180 0.223 0.289 0.310
p 0.048 0.013 0.003 0.001
PAPP-A2 r 0.526
p 0.000
STC1 r 0.317 0.259 −0.471 0.485 0.588
p 0.001 0.005 0.045 0.048 0.000
STC2 r −0.528 0.535 0.291 0.490
p 0.029 0.001 0.002 0.000

Correlation analyses of IGF proteins in ascites (italic font) and the circulation (regular font) in women with ovarian cancer. Correlation for the same protein in ascites and the circulation is shown in bold. Data are expressed as unadjusted correlation coefficient (Pearson’s correlation) r-values (top) and p-values (bottom). Only statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05) are reported. For correlations with IGFBP-4, IGFBP-4 fragments, and IGF bioactivity, analyses were only based on measurements in 20 patients. CT, C-terminal; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; IGFBP, IGF binding protein; NT, N-terminal; PAPP-A, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A; STC2, stanniocalcin-2.