Skip to main content
Health Services Research logoLink to Health Services Research
. 2001 Feb;35(6):1229–1244.

Evaluating large and complex demonstrations: the CHAMPUS reform initiative experience. Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services.

J Zwanziger 1, K D Hart 1, R L Kravitz 1, E M Sloss 1
PMCID: PMC1089188  PMID: 11221817

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the evaluation process for the CHAMPUS Reform Initiative (CRI) both to highlight issues that evaluators must consider when undertaking such projects and to provide policymakers with tools to better assess demonstration project evaluations. DATA SOURCES: The CRI evaluation. STUDY DESIGN: Case study. DATA COLLECTION: Review of CRI evaluation reports. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Although policymakers increasingly rely on the evaluations of demonstration projects to determine whether to extend the scope and funding of many public programs, the results of these evaluations are often difficult to assess. Despite its analytical sophistication, the CRI evaluation was no exception. The somewhat artificial time constraints imposed by policymakers made projection of the CRI's performance beyond the demonstration period particularly difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Much uncertainty generally remains even after well-planned and well-executed evaluations of demonstration projects.

Full text

PDF
1229

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cleary P. D., Jette A. M. The validity of self-reported physician utilization measures. Med Care. 1984 Sep;22(9):796–803. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198409000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davies A. R., Ware J. E., Jr, Brook R. H., Peterson J. R., Newhouse J. P. Consumer acceptance of prepaid and fee-for-service medical care: results from a randomized controlled trial. Health Serv Res. 1986 Aug;21(3):429–452. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Stewart A. L., Hays R. D., Ware J. E., Jr The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care. 1988 Jul;26(7):724–735. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198807000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ware J. E., Jr, Snyder M. K., Wright W. R., Davies A. R. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(3-4):247–263. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(83)90005-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust

RESOURCES