Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 8;24(4):1123. doi: 10.3390/s24041123

Table 3.

Classification performance of CML-CF and DL-RAW approaches.

CML-CF DL-RAW
Activities Alg. CML PCA LDA TW * CNN
(%) (%) (%) (Samples) (%)
SC-L1 RF 76.67 86.67 93.33 30 79.98
DT 66.67 80.0 93.33 50 83.35
SVM 73.33 73.33 93.33 100 83.35
KNN 83.33 73.33 93.33 150 79.98
GNB 70.0 66.67 93.33 200 79.98
LR 80.0 73.33 93.33 250 79.98
SC-L2 RF 70.0 53.33 93.33 30 86.67
DT 70.0 56.67 93.33 50 83.35
SVM 83.33 70.0 90.0 100 79.98
KNN 66.67 70.0 86.67 150 76.66
GNB 76.67 66.67 90.0 200 60.01
LR 76.67 60.0 90.0 250 63.33
SC-L3 RF 90.0 53.33 100.0 30 83.35
DT 83.33 53.33 100.0 50 76.66
SVM 70.0 70.0 96.67 100 63.33
KNN 70.0 50.0 96.67 150 60.01
GNB 73.33 70.0 96.67 200 63.33
LR 80.0 73.33 100.0 250 56.69
SC-L4 RF 63.33 63.33 83.33 30 76.66
DT 80.0 70.0 83.33 50 83.35
SVM 80.0 73.33 90.0 100 79.98
KNN 76.67 70.0 83.33 150 56.69
GNB 76.67 70.0 93.33 200 66.65
LR 76.67 66.67 93.33 250 60.01
SC-L5 RF 90.0 66.67 93.33 30 79.98
DT 86.67 60.0 93.33 50 66.65
SVM 86.67 83.33 93.33 100 56.69
KNN 83.33 83.33 93.33 150 73.34
GNB 86.67 76.67 93.33 200 50.0
LR 90.0 83.33 93.33 250 73.34
6MWT  a RF 86.21 72.41 93.1 30 86.23
DT 86.21 89.66 93.1 50 86.23
SVM 89.66 79.31 96.55 100 82.76
KNN 82.76 82.76 82.76 150 82.76
GNB 89.66 75.86 93.1 200 79.3
LR 82.76 86.21 93.1 250 79.3
100MRW b RF 88.46 88.46 92.31 30 80.76
DT 88.46 92.31 92.31 50 80.76
SVM 88.46 80.77 96.15 100 69.24
KNN 92.31 80.77 92.31 150 84.62
GNB 92.31 88.46 96.15 200 80.76
LR 92.31 88.46 92.31 250 84.62
FW RF 80.0 83.33 93.33 30 83.35
DT 80.0 76.67 93.33 50 86.67
SVM 93.33 86.67 90.0 100 79.98
KNN 83.33 83.33 86.67 150 73.34
GNB 80.0 83.33 86.67 200 76.66
LR 90.0 80.0 86.67 250 76.66

Note: Bold numbers in the table indicate the highest accuracy in the column. a One DMD child was unable to perform the activity. b Four DMD children were unable to perform the activity. * Each second contains 100 samples.