Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 8;24(4):1100. doi: 10.3390/s24041100

Table 2.

Mean difference between the use ratio (UR) derived from accelerometry data and the one derived from video analysis (ΔUR) for each group and each activity count (AC) threshold.

Epoch AC Adults Children
Mean ΔUR 95% CI Mean ΔUR 95% CI
1 2 0.33 0.22–0.43 0.23 0.15–0.30
25 0.20 0.12–0.28 0.08 0.02–0.13
50 0.11 0.04–0.17 −0.05 −0.11–0.006
75 0.06 0.004–0.11 −0.16 −0.21–(−0.10)
100 0.02 −0.03–0.06 −0.24 −0.30–(−0.17)
125 0.01 −0.03–0.05 −0.29 −0.36–(−0.22)
150 0.02 −0.01–0.05 −0.33 −0.41–(−0.26)
1.5 2 0.34 0.24–0.44 0.24 0.16–0.31
25 0.21 0.13–0.29 0.08 0.02–00.14
50 0.11 0.06–0.18 −0.06 −0.11–0.0007
75 0.05 −0.002–0.11 −0.17 −0.22–(−0.11)
100 0.02 −0.03–0.07 −0.25 −0.32–(−0.19)
125 0.02 −0.02–0.06 −0.31 −0.38–(−0.24)
150 0.03 0.001–0.07 −0.36 −0.44–(−0.28)
2 2 0.37 0.26–0.48 0.28 0.20–0.36
25 0.28 0.19–0.38 0.19 0.12–0.25
50 0.21 0.13–0.29 0.09 0.03–0.15
75 0.16 0.08–0.23 0.009 −0.05–0.096
100 0.12 0.05–0.18 −0.07 −0.12–(−0.01)
125 0.08 0.02–0.15 −0.13 −0.19–(−0.07)
150 0.05 −0.01–0.11 −0.20 −0.27–(−0.13)

Legend: AC = activity count; UR = use ratio; the combination of factors for which the 95% confidence interval (CI) included 0, meaning that the UR derived from accelerometry data did not differ significantly from the one derived from video analysis, appears in bold.