Table 2.
Mean difference between the use ratio (UR) derived from accelerometry data and the one derived from video analysis (ΔUR) for each group and each activity count (AC) threshold.
| Epoch | AC | Adults | Children | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ΔUR | 95% CI | Mean ΔUR | 95% CI | ||
| 1 | 2 | 0.33 | 0.22–0.43 | 0.23 | 0.15–0.30 |
| 25 | 0.20 | 0.12–0.28 | 0.08 | 0.02–0.13 | |
| 50 | 0.11 | 0.04–0.17 | −0.05 | −0.11–0.006 | |
| 75 | 0.06 | 0.004–0.11 | −0.16 | −0.21–(−0.10) | |
| 100 | 0.02 | −0.03–0.06 | −0.24 | −0.30–(−0.17) | |
| 125 | 0.01 | −0.03–0.05 | −0.29 | −0.36–(−0.22) | |
| 150 | 0.02 | −0.01–0.05 | −0.33 | −0.41–(−0.26) | |
| 1.5 | 2 | 0.34 | 0.24–0.44 | 0.24 | 0.16–0.31 |
| 25 | 0.21 | 0.13–0.29 | 0.08 | 0.02–00.14 | |
| 50 | 0.11 | 0.06–0.18 | −0.06 | −0.11–0.0007 | |
| 75 | 0.05 | −0.002–0.11 | −0.17 | −0.22–(−0.11) | |
| 100 | 0.02 | −0.03–0.07 | −0.25 | −0.32–(−0.19) | |
| 125 | 0.02 | −0.02–0.06 | −0.31 | −0.38–(−0.24) | |
| 150 | 0.03 | 0.001–0.07 | −0.36 | −0.44–(−0.28) | |
| 2 | 2 | 0.37 | 0.26–0.48 | 0.28 | 0.20–0.36 |
| 25 | 0.28 | 0.19–0.38 | 0.19 | 0.12–0.25 | |
| 50 | 0.21 | 0.13–0.29 | 0.09 | 0.03–0.15 | |
| 75 | 0.16 | 0.08–0.23 | 0.009 | −0.05–0.096 | |
| 100 | 0.12 | 0.05–0.18 | −0.07 | −0.12–(−0.01) | |
| 125 | 0.08 | 0.02–0.15 | −0.13 | −0.19–(−0.07) | |
| 150 | 0.05 | −0.01–0.11 | −0.20 | −0.27–(−0.13) | |
Legend: AC = activity count; UR = use ratio; the combination of factors for which the 95% confidence interval (CI) included 0, meaning that the UR derived from accelerometry data did not differ significantly from the one derived from video analysis, appears in bold.