Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 16;16(4):548. doi: 10.3390/nu16040548

Table 3.

Hazard ratios (95% CI) for the incidence of NAFLD according to 24-h urinary sodium excretion.

Hazard Ratio (95% CI) p-Value
T1 T2 T3
All (n = 2582) 861 861 860
 Incident case, n (%) 139 (16.14) 182 (21.13) 203 (23.60) <0.001
 Crude analysis Ref 1.32 (1.06, 1.65) 1.55 (1.25, 1.92) <0.001 *
 Multivariate analysis Ref 1.31 (1.05–1.64) 1.54 (1.24–1.92) <0.001 *
Men (n = 1011) 337 337 337
 Incident case, n (%) 49 (14.54) 58 (17.21) 66 (19.58) 0.174
 Crude analysis Ref 1.18 (0.80, 1.72) 1.41 (0.98, 2.04) 0.064 *
 Multivariate analysis Ref 1.19 (0.81, 1.75) 1.50 (1.02, 2.19) <0.001 *
Females (n = 1571) 524 524 523
 Incident case, n (%) 90 (17.17) 124 (23.66) 137 (26.19) 0.001
 Crude analysis Ref 1.40 (1.07, 1.84) 1.62 (1.24, 2.12) <0.001 *
 Multivariate analysis Ref 1.35 (1.03, 1.78) 1.51 (1.15, 1.98) 0.003 *

Multivariate analysis in all subjects: age, smoking status, triglyceride, total cholesterol, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), hypertension, postmenopausal status. Multivariate analysis in males: age, physical activity, triglyceride, albumin, eGFR, and hyperlipidemia. Multivariate analysis in females: triglyceride, total cholesterol, albumin, HOMA-IR, and hypertension. * p-values were analyzed using the trend of the odds test. NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; CI, confidence interval; T1, lowest tertile; T2, middle tertile; T3, highest tertile.