Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 13;29(4):832. doi: 10.3390/molecules29040832

Table 2.

Comparison of full-length-level modeling results by AlphaFold2-based methods and protein language model (PLM)-based methods on the 65 CASP14 full-length targets. Here, AlphaFold2-Single is the default AlphaFold2 pipeline, with the only query sequence as the input MSA. p-values were calculated between TM-scores by AlphaFold2 and others using paired one-sided Student’s t-tests. #{TM > 0.5} is the number of targets with a TM-score > 0.5.

Method Method Type TM-Score p-Value #{TM > 0.5}
AlphaFold2 AlphaFold2-based 0.8514 - 60
ColabFold 0.8461 2.37 × 10−1 61
OpenFold 0.8375 1.46 × 10−1 59
Uni-Fold 0.8561 9.82 × 10−1 61
AlphaFold2-Single PLM-based 0.5164 6.88 × 10−12 30
ESMFold 0.6676 1.80 × 10−10 41
OmegaFold 0.6728 4.42 × 10−6 43