Table 6.
Comparison of object pose estimation datasets.
| Dataset | Years | Levels | Categories | Suitable Scenes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LM [78] | 2012 | Instance-Level | 15 | Objects are cluttered and untextured with limited viewpoints. |
| LM-O [79] | 2014 | Instance-Level | 8 | Objects are cluttered and more severely occluded. |
| Shapenet [135] | 2016 | Category-Level | 16 | Point cloud dataset of common objects in life with fine segmentation. |
| T-LESS [12] | 2017 | Instance-Level | 30 | Industry-related scenes with few object textures, strong symmetry, and mutual occlusion. |
| ITODD [13] | 2017 | Instance-Level | 28 | Industrial scenes with strong and scarce color information in the case of random projections. |
| Siléane [136] | 2017 | Instance-Level | 8 | Different symmetry objects. |
| YCB-V [20] | 2018 | Instance-Level | 21 | Daily objects with occlusion in different light situations, and applicable to the video needs of the object. |
| TUD-L/TYO-L [35] | 2018 | Instance-Level | 24 | Different light conditions. |
| NOCS [116] | 2019 | Category-Level | 6 | Category-level position of common objects, meet real and synthetic dataset requirements. |
| Fraunhofer [137] | 2019 | Instance-Level | 10 | Industrial large-scale dataset, including different modalities, is suitable for grasping tasks. |
| Objectron [138] | 2021 | Category-Level | 9 | Meeting generalizability and tracking task requirements with large-scale multiple views. |