Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 7;24(4):1076. doi: 10.3390/s24041076

Table 6.

Comparison of object pose estimation datasets.

Dataset Years Levels Categories Suitable Scenes
LM [78] 2012 Instance-Level 15 Objects are cluttered and untextured with limited viewpoints.
LM-O [79] 2014 Instance-Level 8 Objects are cluttered and more severely occluded.
Shapenet [135] 2016 Category-Level 16 Point cloud dataset of common objects in life with fine segmentation.
T-LESS [12] 2017 Instance-Level 30 Industry-related scenes with few object textures, strong symmetry, and mutual occlusion.
ITODD [13] 2017 Instance-Level 28 Industrial scenes with strong and scarce color information in the case of random projections.
Siléane [136] 2017 Instance-Level 8 Different symmetry objects.
YCB-V [20] 2018 Instance-Level 21 Daily objects with occlusion in different light situations, and applicable to the video needs of the object.
TUD-L/TYO-L [35] 2018 Instance-Level 24 Different light conditions.
NOCS [116] 2019 Category-Level 6 Category-level position of common objects, meet real and synthetic dataset requirements.
Fraunhofer [137] 2019 Instance-Level 10 Industrial large-scale dataset, including different modalities, is suitable for grasping tasks.
Objectron [138] 2021 Category-Level 9 Meeting generalizability and tracking task requirements with large-scale multiple views.