Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 16;8(1):203–240. doi: 10.3233/ADR-230045

Table 2.

Included studies

Study Country Study design Population n Diagnostic criteria Diagnostic use Female: N (%) Mean age Follow up
(centers) (source, date) MCI due to AD AD dementia CSF PET (SD)*
Prognostic factors
Cullen 2021 [28] •• BioFINDER Sweden Multiple (n = NR) ADNI USA, Canada Retrospective cohort BioFINDER Dates: July 2008 to June 2019 ADNI Dates: Sep 2005 and Dec 2019 BioFINDER MCI: n = 340 ADNI MCI: n = 543 BioFINDER Petersen criteria (Petersen 2004) ADNI NR BioFINDER DSM-5 criteria ADNI NINCDS-ADRDA criteria (McKhann 1984) NR NR BioFINDER 54 (36.5) ADNI 42 (51.2) BioFINDER 71.36 (5.47) ADNI 71.51 (7.59) 4 y
Janelidze 2020 [51] •• Sweden (Multicenter: n = 2) USA (Single center n = 1) Prospective cohort (Swedish BioFINDER study and Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders/Brain and Body Donation Program) Dates: NR MCI: n = 125 Petersen criteria (Petersen 2004) As reported in BIOFINDER NR NR 48 (38.4) Range: 63-76 4.9 y
Lee 2012 [25] •• South Korea Multicenter (n = 56) Prospective cohort (Nationwide hospital-based cohort from Clinical Research Center for Dementia of South Korea) Dates: 2006 to 2010 MCI: n = 504 Petersen criteria (Winbland 2004) NINCDS-ADRDA criteria (McKhann 1984) NR NR 325 (64.5) 70.8 (NR) 1.47 y (Range: 5.5 mo to 5 y)
LoBue 2018 [27] •• Canada, USA Multiple (n = 34) Retrospective cohort (ADNI) Dates: Sep 2005 to Jun 2015 MCI: n = 2719 Peterson 2005 NINCDS/ADRDA criteria (McKhann 1984) NR NR 1342 (49.4) NR Median: 4 y (IQR 2 to 5 y)
Mouchet 2021 [35] •• USA Multiple (n = NR) Prospective cohort (NACC UDS) Dates: Sep 2005 to Feb 2019 MCI: n = 830 Albert 2011 McKhann 2011 NR NR 483 (58.2) 78.5 (8.8) Mean 3.6 y (SD: 2.5; Range: 0–11)
Palmqvist 2021 [29] • ADNI: USA, Canada Multiple (n = NR) BioFINDER: Sweden Multiple (n = NR) Retrospective cohort ADNI Dates 2003 to 2019 BioFINDER Dates: 2010 to 2014 BioFINDER MCI: n = 148 ADNI MCI: n = 86 BioFINDER Petersen 2004 ADNI Subjective memory concern; abnormal memory function score MMSE score between 24 and 30, CDR = 0.5, preserved cognition and functional performance BioFINDER NINCDS/ADRDA criteria (McKhann 2011) were Aβ-positive according to the Aβ PET scan (Landau 2012) ADNI NINCDS/ADRDA criteria (McKhann 2011) NR Yes BioFINDER 283 (52.1) ADNI 168 (49.4) NR 4 y
Pichet Binette 2022 [20] • USA Unclear (n = NR) Retrospective cohort NCT01028053 Dates: 2009 to 2014 MCI: n = 110 Peterson 2005 McKhann 2011 Y Y 52 (47.3) NR 3 y
Pyun 2017 [26] •• Canada, USA Multicenter (n = NR) Retrospective cohort (ADNI) Dates: 2003 to 25th May 2017 MCI: n = 258 Presence of objective memory impairment but without meeting the criteria for dementia As described in ADNI NR NR 101 (39.1) Median: 74.1 (IQR: 69.5–78.5) Up to 3 y; Median 24 mo
Richard 2012 [23] •• Canada, USA Multiple (n > 50) Retrospective cohort (ADNI) Dates: 2003 to Jun 2011 MCI: n = 397 As reported in the ADNI As reported in the ADNI NR NR 141 (35.5) NR Average: 2.7 y (SD 1.0)
Spalletta 2012 [34] • Italy Multiple (n = 3) Prospective cohort (Italian memory clinics) Dates NR Mild AD dementia: n = 119 NA NINCDS-ADRDA criteria (McKhann 1984) NR NR 67 (56.3) 74.7 (6.3) 1 y
Spencer 2019 [31] •• Canada, USA Multiple (n = NR) Retrospective cohort (ADNI) Dates: Aug 2005 and Sep 2007 MCI: 185 MMSE score between 24 and 30, a CDR rating of 0.5, both a subjective memory complaint and an objective memory impairment, intact ADL, and absence of dementia Diagnosis of dementia at follow-up was determined by the study clinician. Criteria as described in the ADNI NR NR 63 (34) NR Mean 4.3 y (SD: 2.8)
Therriault 2021 [30] •• Canada, USA Multiple (n = NR) Retrospective cohort (ADNI) Dates: NR to 2020 MCI: n = 604 CDR of 0.5, with the memory box score of at least 0.5, with preserved general cognitive performance As reported in ADNI NR NR 257 (42.5) 72.2 (7.47) Median 4.1 y (SD:1.34)*
Tosto 2014 [36] •• Canada, USA Multicenter (n = NR) Retrospective cohort (ADNI) Dates: NR MCI:N=332 Aged between 55 and 90 y; a memory symptom; objective evidence of abnormal memory; CDR score of 0.5, with a Memory Box score of at least 0.5; MMSE score between 24 and 30 (inclusive); preserved general cognition NA NR NR 118 (35) 74.6 (7.4) 48 mo
Van Loenhoud 2022 [52] • Netherlands Single (n = 1) Retrospective cohort (Amsterdam Dementia Cohort) Dates: 2000 and 2019 MCI: n = 274 Albert 2011 McKhann 2011 Y Y 130 (47.4) 67.1 (7.4) Median 2.3 y*
Wolfsgruber 2017 [33] •• Germany Multiple (n = NR) Retrospective cohort (German DCN) Dates: NR MCI: n = 134 Bondi 2014 Dubois 2016 Y Y 62 (46.3) 65.5 (8.1) 27.0 (0.95) mo
Xue 2020 [32] •• Canada, USA Multiple (n > 50) Retrospective cohort (ADNI) Dates: From 2003 MCI: n = 193 MMSE score between 24 and 30; CDR score of 0.5; objective memory loss preserved ADL, and the absence of dementia NINCDS-ADRDA criteria (had MMSE scores between 20-26 and a CDR of 0.5 or 1.0) NR NR 63 (32.6) 74.4 (7.5) NR
Budd Haeberlein 2022 [7] •• (Associated publication Salloway 2022 [37] EMERGE: Multiple (n = 180) ENGAGE: Multiple (n = 181) Two Phase 3 RCTs: EMERGE &ENGAGE Enrolment occurred from Aug 2015 to Jul 2018, and the trials were terminated early (Mar 21, 2019) based on a futility analysis. eAD EMERGE Placebo: n = 548 Low dose: n = 543 High dose: n = 547 ENGAGE Placebo: n = 545 Low dose: n = 547 High dose: n = 555 MCI due to AD or mild AD dementia, CDR of 0.5, objective evidence of cognitive impairment at screening, MMSE score of 24 to 30 MCI due to AD or mild AD dementia, CDR of 0.5, objective evidence of cognitive impairment at screening, MMSE score of 24 to 30 NR Y eAD EMERGE Placebo: 290 (53) Low dose: 269 (50) High dose: 284 (52) ENGAGE Placebo: 287 (53) Low dose: 284 (52) High dose: 292 (53) eAD EMERGE Placebo: 70.8 (7.4) Low dose: 70.6 (7.4) High dose: 70.6 (7.5) ENGAGE Placebo: 69.8 (7.7) Low dose: 70.4 (7.0) High dose: 70.0 (7.7) 78 weeks
Mintun 2021 [9] •• Canada, USA Multiple (n = 56) Phase 2 RCT: TRAILBLAZER-ALZ (donanemab versus placebo) eAD Donanemab: n = 131 Placebo: n = 126 Dubois 2007 Dubois 2007 NR Donanemab: 68 (51.9) Placebo: 65 (51.6) Donanemab: 75.0 (5.6) Placebo: 75.4 (5.4) 72 wk
Ostrowitzki 2017 [39] ••• Worldwide Multiple (n = 128) Phase 3 RCT: Scarlet RoAD (gantenerumab versus placebo) Prodromal AD Placebo: n = 266 105 mg: n = 271 255 mg: n = 260 Dubois 2007 NA NR Placebo: 69.5 (7.5) 105 mg: 70.3 (7.0) 255 mg: 71.3 (7.1) 2 y
Sevigny 2016 [38] •• USA Multiple (n = 33) Phase 1b RCT: PRIME (placebo versus multiple dose aducanumab) Oct 2012 to Jan 2014 eAD Placebo: n = 40 1 mg/kg: n = 31 3 mg/kg: n = 32 6 mg/kg: n = 30 10 mg/kg: n = 32 Derby 2013 Dubois 2010 McKhann 2011 NR Placebo: 23 (58) 1 mg/kg: 13 (42) 3 mg/kg: 17 (53) 6 mg/kg: 15 (50) 10 mg/kg: 15 (47) Placebo: 72.8 (7.2) 1 mg/kg: 72.6 (7.8) 3 mg/kg: 70.5 (8.2) 6 mg/kg: 73.3 (9.3) 10 mg/kg: 73.7 (8.3) 54 wk
Swanson 2021 [8] ••• Worldwide Multiple (n = 169) Phase 2b RCT: BAN2401-G000-201 (placebo versus multiple dose lecanemab) Patients with MCI due to AD or mild AD dementia Dates: NR eAD Placebo: n = 245 Lecanemab: n = 609 NIAA-AA NIAA-AA Placebo: 137 (58) 2.5 mg/kg biweekly: 26 (50) 5 mg/kg Monthly: 24 (50) 5 mg/kg Biweekly 48 (54) 10 mg/kg Monthly 110 (45) 10 mg/kg Biweekly 64 (42) Median (range) Placebo: 72 (50–89) 2.5 mg/kg biweekly: 71 (50–86) 5 mg/kg Monthly: 71 (55–84) 5 mg/kg Biweekly 72 (52–87) 10 mg/kg Monthly 71 (53–90) 10 mg/kg Biweekly 73 (51–88) 18 mo

AD, Alzheimer’s Disease; ADL, Activities of daily living; ADNI, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; CDR, The Clinical Dementia Rating; DCN, German Dementia Competence Network; DSM, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; IQR, interquartile range; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; mo, month; MoCA, The Montreal Cognitive Assessment; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MSCI, Moderate/Severe Cognitive Impairment; NACC, National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center; NIA-AA, National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association criteria; NINCDS/ADRDA, National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke/Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association; NR, not reported; PET, positron emission tomography; SD, standard deviation; UDS, uniform data set; wk, week; y, year. *Unless otherwise stated. •low risk of bias •• moderate risk of bias ••• high risk of bias.